NPR sues Trump admin after POTUS' executive order to cut funding, alleges 'violation of First Amendment'

On May 1, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to freeze all funding to NPR and PBS
The lawsuit, filed by NPR and other public radio organizations, alleged that President Donald Trump’s order violated the First Amendment’s protections for freedom of speech (Getty Images)
The lawsuit, filed by NPR and other public radio organizations, alleged that President Donald Trump’s order violated the First Amendment’s protections for freedom of speech (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: National Public Radio (NPR) has filed a First Amendment lawsuit against the Donald Trump administration over the POTUS' executive order seeking to cease all federal funding for the nonprofit broadcaster.

The lawsuit, filed by NPR and other public radio organizations, including Colorado Public Radio and Aspen Public Radio, alleged that Trump’s order violated the First Amendment’s protections for freedom of speech.

“The president has no authority under the Constitution to take such actions. On the contrary, the power of the purse is reserved to Congress,” read the lawsuit filed in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, May 27, Politico reported.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office on January 20, 2025, in Washington, DC (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

NPR claims Donald Trump’s order threatens existence of public radio

On May 1, Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to freeze all funding to NPR and PBS. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting spends more than $500 million on public radio and TV stations annually.

In his executive order, Trump accused NPR of bias and stated that taxpayer funding should be used toward "fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage." 

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 12: U.S. President Donald Trump speks as he signs an executive order aimed at reducing the cost of prescription drugs and pharmaceuticals by 30% to 80% during an event in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on May 12, 2025, in Washington, DC. Trump announced his plan to lower drug prices would tie their cost to drug prices paid in foreign nations. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump speaks as he signs an executive order aimed at reducing the cost of prescription drugs and pharmaceuticals by 30% to 80% during an event in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on May 12, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

In its lawsuit, NPR asked the court to permanently block Trump’s order, alleging that the order exemplifies “textbook retaliation” in violation of the First Amendment.

“It is not always obvious when the government has acted with a retaliatory purpose in violation of the First Amendment. ‘But this wolf comes as a wolf,’” the lawsuit stated, referencing a 1988 dissent penned by the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

U.S. President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 3, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump announced that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, one of the largest manufacturers of semiconductor chips, plans to invest $100 billion in new manufacturing facilities in the United States. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 3, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“The Order targets NPR and PBS expressly because, in the President’s view, their news and other content is not ‘fair, accurate, or unbiased,’” it continued.

Moreover, it “threatens the existence of a public radio system that millions of Americans across the country rely on for vital news and information,” the lawsuit further stated.

The lawsuit lists White House budget director Russel Vought, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and National Endowment for the Arts head Maria Rosario Jackson as defendants, in addition to Trump.



 

The lawsuit further contended that Congress has long recognized that the speech it supports with public funding “remains private—and thus fully protected from censorship, retaliation or other forms of governmental interference.”

“Yet the President—criticizing what he perceives as ‘bias’ in the award-winning journalism and cultural programming produced by NPR—has issued an Executive Order that thwarts Congress’s intent and the First Amendment rights of Plaintiffs to be free from the government’s attempts to control their private speech, and their rights to be free from retaliation aimed at punishing and chilling protected speech, journalistic activities, and expressive association,” it mentioned, as per NBC. 



 

White House defends Donald Trump’s executive order

When asked about NPR’s lawsuit, the White House defended Donald Trump’s executive order, stating the president is “exercising his lawful authority to limit funding” to the two news outlets.

“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers’ dime,” White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said.

“Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS,” he continued.

“The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective,” he added.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

A spokesperson said that the allegations were 'completely false' and reaffirmed that Ilhan Omar is her real name
2026-10-23T04:04:58.000Z
Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the lower court’s order sought to address alleged misinformation about election rules rather than change the state law
2026-10-23T03:09:16.000Z
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine urged Vivek Ramaswamy to pull the Amy Acton ad, calling it 'deeply, deeply troubling' and wrong to run
2026-10-23T02:28:06.000Z
As per Pentagon officials, it gives a similar 'tingling sensation' as the blast of heat when opening an oven, resulting in a 10-15 minute itching and burning sensation
2026-10-22T20:33:58.000Z
A Miami federal judge warned Trump that the lawsuit could be dismissed unless he provided the requested information and sat for a deposition
2026-10-22T19:38:37.000Z
In the ad, Acton’s mother calls her a liar and attacks her character. Acton suffered physical abuse from her mother’s then-husband in her childhood, which resulted in authorities removing Acton from her mother’s care
2026-10-22T18:24:01.000Z
The Department of Justice has accused Louis Lucas of using the influence of her post for personal profits and attempting to shield the alleged criminal enterprise from legal scrutiny
2026-10-22T17:09:09.000Z
In a 19-page ruling, the judge clarified that neither the plaintiffs nor the court considered DHS's operation unlawful
2026-10-22T15:41:12.000Z
The former congresswoman called the conflict a “stupid senseless war” and distanced herself from the Democratic candidate
2026-10-22T05:39:27.000Z
WHCA President emphasized that independent reporting requires journalists to challenge the president without fearing the loss of press access
2026-10-22T05:21:51.000Z