'The more the merrier': Internet welcomes move to take Trump off Illinois and Massachusetts ballots
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA: On Thursday, January 4, groups of voters hailing from Illinois and Massachusetts submitted motions to exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot, according to a report by CNN.
This adds to the growing list of states where the former president is facing a challenge to his candidacy under the 14th Amendment's insurrectionist ban.
View this post on Instagram
In Illinois, the motion filed in conjunction with the liberal advocacy group Free Speech For People requests the Illinois Board of Elections to conduct a hearing on the matter and prohibit Trump from appearing on both primary and general election ballots.
The basis for the challenge is the former president's alleged involvement in the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack.
What do the motions filed in Illinois and Massachusetts entail?
“Donald J Trump, through his words and actions, after swearing an oath as an officer of the United States to support the Constitution, engaged in insurrection or rebellion, or gave aid and comfort to its enemies, as defined by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment,” the voters stated in their petition to the board of elections.
The petition noted that Donald Trump “has never expressed regret that his supporters violently attacked the U.S. Capitol” and threatened representatives inside, and that “Trump has not apologized to anyone, either on his own behalf or on behalf of his supporters, for the January 6 attack.”
BREAKING: we just filed in Illinois a challenge, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, to Donald Trump's eligibility to appear on the state's presidential primary and general election ballot. @FSFP #TrumpIsDisqualified
— John Bonifaz (@JohnBonifaz) January 4, 2024
https://t.co/7888gCagZs
The voters’ political affiliations were not disclosed in the list provided.
The same advocacy group mounted a legal challenge against the eligibility of Donald Trump to appear on Massachusetts ballots for both the primary and presidential elections in the state.
BREAKING: Massachusetts Voters Move to Enforce 14th Amendment and Bar Donald Trump From Ballot https://t.co/LKpfqo0Hhv
— Free Speech For People (@FSFP) January 4, 2024
The challengers include Kim Janey, the former Democratic Mayor of Boston, and “a mix of Republican, Independent, and Democratic voters,” according to the group's statement.
The US Supreme Court is poised to review the state court ruling in Colorado, which concluded that Donald Trump is unqualified to run for office.
Although the Colorado decision is applicable only to that state, the verdict of the judges could set a precedent for the entire country.
View this post on Instagram
States have different adjudication protocols for handling challenges of this nature.
Some may commence as court cases, while others may be initially overseen by state election officials, such as a Secretary of State.
Recently, the Secretary of State of Maine eliminated Trump from the state's 2024 primary ballot, and the Trump team contested that verdict in state court on Tuesday, January 2, 2024.
View this post on Instagram
Another initiative to remove Trump from the primary and general election ballots in Oregon due to his involvement in the January 6 insurrection may soon be decided by the Oregon Supreme Court.
Michigan and Minnesota judges rejected attempts to prevent Trump from appearing on the primary ballot in their respective states.
Notably, Free Speech For People has supported the efforts to oust Trump off of the ballot in Oregon, Michigan, and Minnesota, as well.
Internet welcomes initiative to take Trump off ballot
People on X applauded the motion filed by the voters of the two respective states and forecasted the possibility of other states joining in to achieve the same.
Groups of voters from Illinois and Massachusetts have filed motions to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot, adding to the list of states where the former president faces a challenge to his candidacy under the 14th Amendment’s so-called insurrectionist ban. https://t.co/CflA5lbSaA
— CNN (@CNN) January 4, 2024
One X user remarked, "The more the merrier."
Another user wrote, "Good for them."
Someone else said, "That's fair a known-to-be-horrible person n very likely criminal is not a good candidate for any office."
that's fair a known-to-be-horrible person n very likely criminal is not a good candidate for any office
— azi , david-sunshine , starchild , (@peacedragon619) January 5, 2024
One user remarked, "Hope it catches on."
Another quipped, "Good... take out the trash."
Good... take out the trash
— Christine McGarvey, The Tucson Toy Huntress (@MaraJadeLegoLdy) January 5, 2024
"This is becoming intriguing," someone else said.
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.