Trump defamation suit against WSJ over Epstein letter story dismissed by court

Judge rules Trump failed ‘actual malice’ test leaves door open to refile case
US District Judge Darrin Gayles rules Trump failed to show 'actual malice,' the standard required for public figures to pursue defamation claims (Getty Images)
US District Judge Darrin Gayles rules Trump failed to show 'actual malice,' the standard required for public figures to pursue defamation claims (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A federal judge has dismissed US President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a letter allegedly sent to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

US District Judge Darrin Gayles ruled that Trump failed to demonstrate “actual malice,” the legal threshold required for public figures to pursue defamation claims.

A sign is seen outside a Wall Street Journal office on Avenue of the Americas July 31, 2007 in New York City. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. has reportedly secured sufficient votes from the Bancroft family to take over Dow Jones Co. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
A sign is seen outside a Wall Street Journal office on Avenue of the Americas July, 31, 2007, in New York City. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. has reportedly secured sufficient votes from the Bancroft family to take over Dow Jones Co (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Judge says ‘nowhere close’ to legal standard

In his ruling, Gayles said the complaint fell far short of the required standard.

“The complaint comes nowhere close to this standard. Quite the opposite,” he wrote, effectively ending the case at this stage.

The lawsuit stemmed from a report published last year alleging that Trump sent a letter to Epstein in 2003 for his 50th birthday. The article described the message as containing text framed by the outline of a woman and ending with a suggestive note.

Trump has denied authoring the letter, claiming it was fabricated and that the newspaper was informed of its alleged falsity before publication. The Journal has stood by its reporting.

U.S. President Donald Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding the first Cabinet meeting of his second term, joined by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Court avoids ruling on facts

The judge clarified that the dismissal does not determine whether Trump wrote the letter or the nature of his relationship with Epstein.

“Whether President Trump was the author of the Letter or Epstein’s friend are questions of fact that cannot be determined at this stage,” Gayles noted.

He added that even if the “actual malice” standard had been met, Trump’s claims for special damages would still not stand.

Donald Trump, his wife Melania Trump, and the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his longtime partner Ghislaine Maxwell (Getty Images)
Trump, his wife Melania Trump, and the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his longtime partner Ghislaine Maxwell (Getty Images)

Trump team vows to refile case

A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said the president would seek to amend and refile the lawsuit, describing it as a “powerhouse” case aimed at holding media organizations accountable.

The suit names multiple defendants, including the newspaper, its reporters, parent company News Corp, its leadership, Dow Jones, and media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

The case comes amid renewed scrutiny of Trump’s past association with Epstein, which the president has repeatedly downplayed, saying the two had a falling out years ago.

Separately, First Lady Melania Trump recently issued a rare public statement denying any connection to Epstein and condemning what she called defamatory claims against her.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

GOP senators opposed provisions that would lift sanctions on Iranian oil exports and potentially unfreeze Tehran's assets
18 minutes ago
Vice President JD Vance made it clear that the administration would not lift sanctions based solely on a preliminary deal
2 hours ago
Justice Neil Gorsuch said that the government's historical analogy failed to justify disarming regular controlled-substance users
3 hours ago
Despite fears that tensions would disrupt a key shipping route and raise oil prices, Vance said prices stayed near pre-war levels
3 hours ago
The remarks came hours after President Trump criticized opponents who said the Iran deal was too lenient or failed to curb Tehran's ambitions
5 hours ago
Keith Sonderling warned states could lose administrative funding over unemployment fraud, calling it an unprecedented nationwide crackdown
12 hours ago
Clinton offered assessments of US foreign policy, Dem party strategy, Trump’s future influence and the Supreme Court
13 hours ago
Trump's comments especially stood out because they were delivered during a G7 press conference rather than at a campaign rally or on social media
13 hours ago
Sean Hannity repeatedly argued that President Trump's public statements should carry more weight than the written memorandum
14 hours ago
Hillary Clinton suggested that many critics reject the Gaza plan primarily because Donald Trump proposed it, not because of what the plan contains
14 hours ago