Trump defamation suit against WSJ over Epstein letter story dismissed by court

Judge rules Trump failed ‘actual malice’ test leaves door open to refile case
US District Judge Darrin Gayles rules Trump failed to show 'actual malice,' the standard required for public figures to pursue defamation claims (Getty Images)
US District Judge Darrin Gayles rules Trump failed to show 'actual malice,' the standard required for public figures to pursue defamation claims (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A federal judge has dismissed US President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a letter allegedly sent to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

US District Judge Darrin Gayles ruled that Trump failed to demonstrate “actual malice,” the legal threshold required for public figures to pursue defamation claims.

A sign is seen outside a Wall Street Journal office on Avenue of the Americas July 31, 2007 in New York City. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. has reportedly secured sufficient votes from the Bancroft family to take over Dow Jones Co. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
A sign is seen outside a Wall Street Journal office on Avenue of the Americas July, 31, 2007, in New York City. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. has reportedly secured sufficient votes from the Bancroft family to take over Dow Jones Co (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Judge says ‘nowhere close’ to legal standard

In his ruling, Gayles said the complaint fell far short of the required standard.

“The complaint comes nowhere close to this standard. Quite the opposite,” he wrote, effectively ending the case at this stage.

The lawsuit stemmed from a report published last year alleging that Trump sent a letter to Epstein in 2003 for his 50th birthday. The article described the message as containing text framed by the outline of a woman and ending with a suggestive note.

Trump has denied authoring the letter, claiming it was fabricated and that the newspaper was informed of its alleged falsity before publication. The Journal has stood by its reporting.

U.S. President Donald Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump is holding the first Cabinet meeting of his second term, joined by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Trump listens during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on February 26, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Court avoids ruling on facts

The judge clarified that the dismissal does not determine whether Trump wrote the letter or the nature of his relationship with Epstein.

“Whether President Trump was the author of the Letter or Epstein’s friend are questions of fact that cannot be determined at this stage,” Gayles noted.

He added that even if the “actual malice” standard had been met, Trump’s claims for special damages would still not stand.

Donald Trump, his wife Melania Trump, and the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his longtime partner Ghislaine Maxwell (Getty Images)
Trump, his wife Melania Trump, and the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his longtime partner Ghislaine Maxwell (Getty Images)

Trump team vows to refile case

A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said the president would seek to amend and refile the lawsuit, describing it as a “powerhouse” case aimed at holding media organizations accountable.

The suit names multiple defendants, including the newspaper, its reporters, parent company News Corp, its leadership, Dow Jones, and media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

The case comes amid renewed scrutiny of Trump’s past association with Epstein, which the president has repeatedly downplayed, saying the two had a falling out years ago.

Separately, First Lady Melania Trump recently issued a rare public statement denying any connection to Epstein and condemning what she called defamatory claims against her.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Members of both parties in the House, including returning and newly elected lawmakers, meet privately to choose their leaders through secret ballot voting
2026-11-10T20:48:49.000Z
A three-judge panel of a federal appeals court ruled against the Trump administration’s plan to investigate the government’s confidential data leak cases, suggesting access to journalists’ LinkedIn records could impart a 'damaging blow' to First Amendment rights
2026-11-10T20:03:35.000Z
As the House prepares to consider a vote on Hegseth’s impeachment resolution, administration officials and Republican allies, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, Attorney General Todd Blanche and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have defended the Pentagon chief’s military actions in Iran
2026-11-10T18:54:10.000Z
Senator Rick Scott, who signed a letter calling for Tuesday’s leadership vote to be postponed, said Republicans should first decide what they want to achieve before choosing their leader
2026-11-10T17:09:57.000Z
Thomas Massie introduced a privileged resolution under House rules, requiring the House to take it up within two legislative days if it is recognized as privileged
2026-11-10T15:38:44.000Z
General Counsel Tim Teter's outreach to federal investigators triggered internal concerns before the Justice Department took over the Megaspeed case
2026-11-10T07:07:01.000Z
Reporter Reese Gorman reported that Haley Stevens stayed in the Republican cloakroom during House votes while reporters found her office locked
2026-11-10T06:20:25.000Z
The former Trump aide pushed back against a New York Post report citing advisers who claimed she was trying to impress the president
2026-11-10T05:26:59.000Z
Jensen Huang opposed China chip curbs in a 2025 meeting with Donald Trump, after which Nvidia pledged $500 billion to US manufacturing and donated $20 million to Trump's ballroom fund
2026-11-10T04:40:28.000Z
Marjorie Taylor Greene blamed Donald Trump's team for misleading him about Republican losses and argued that millions of GOP voters stayed home
2026-11-10T03:49:15.000Z