Trump predicts massive repayment burden if tariffs are struck down by Supreme Court

President Donald Trump warned that a Supreme Court ruling against tariffs could hurt the economy, forcing the US to repay billions
PUBLISHED 1 HOUR AGO
Supreme Court prepared to rule on tariff powers, examining whether President Donald Trump had exceeded authority under national security laws, while he maintained that tariffs had driven strong economic growth (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Supreme Court prepared to rule on tariff powers, examining whether President Donald Trump had exceeded authority under national security laws, while he maintained that tariffs had driven strong economic growth (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: President Donald Trump warned on Monday, January 12, that the US economy could face severe consequences if the Supreme Court struck down the tariffs he had imposed on a wide range of imports.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote that the country would be “SCREWED!” if the high court ruled against what he described as a “National Security bonanza.”

The warning came as the Supreme Court prepared to issue a decision in a case challenging the president’s authority to impose sweeping import taxes without congressional approval, a central pillar of Trump’s trade agenda.

High court ruling expected very soon



The case is expected to be resolved in the coming days, with a ruling possible as early as Wednesday. At issue is whether Trump exceeded his authority by invoking national security laws to levy broad tariffs on foreign goods.

In his post, Trump said that an adverse ruling would expose the federal government to massive repayment obligations.

“The actual numbers that we would have to pay back if, for any reason, the Supreme Court were to rule against the United States of America on Tariffs, would be many Hundreds of Billions of Dollars,” he wrote.

Payback costs could reach trillions

SAN PEDRO, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 01: Container ships and shipping containers (C) are viewed at the P
The president claims the cost of reimbursing companies for investments made to avoid tariffs would be 'almost impossible' for the country to pay (Getty Images)

Trump argued that the financial exposure would extend beyond refunded duties. He said companies and foreign governments have invested heavily in new plants and supply chains designed to avoid the tariffs.

“When these Investments are added, we are talking about Trillions of Dollars!” Trump wrote. “It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country to pay.”

He rejected the idea that any refund process would be straightforward, saying it would take years to determine “who, when, and where, to pay.”

Tariffs credited for huge economic growth

NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 15:  Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a lunch hoste
Donald Trump credited the tariffs for the 4.3% annualized growth rate recorded between July and September (Getty Images)

The president has repeatedly credited tariffs for the recent economic performance. After the Commerce Department reported last month that the economy grew at an annualized rate of 4.3% between July and September, Trump attributed the gains to his trade policies.

“The TARIFFS are responsible for the GREAT USA Economic Numbers JUST ANNOUNCED…AND THEY WILL ONLY GET BETTER!” he wrote at the time.

He also cited “NO INFLATION” and “GREAT NATIONAL SECURITY,” ending his message with, “Pray for the US Supreme Court!!!”

Chief Justice John Roberts labels tariffs as taxes

(Fox News)
During oral arguments, Chief Justice Roberts characterized the tariffs as 'taxes on Americans,' signaling potential trouble for the administration (Fox News)

The legal outlook remains uncertain. During oral arguments in November, Chief Justice John Roberts referred to the tariffs as “taxes on Americans,” a characterization that raised concerns among administration allies.

If the court agrees that the measures function as domestic taxes requiring congressional authorization, it could invalidate the legal framework Trump used to impose them.

Such a ruling would unwind the tariff regime and trigger the financial and policy consequences the president warned about in his post.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Elizabeth Warren urged Democrats to confront economic pressures, saying that voters wanted leaders who tackled affordability and broken systems
1 hour ago
GOP bill sought ban on stock trades as the measure targeted lawmakers, spouses, and children, requiring advance disclosures and penalties for breaches
2 hours ago
With Garlin Gilchrist out, Jocelyn Benson's fundraising edge and statewide recognition made her the clear Democratic frontrunner
3 hours ago
Michael Steele said that Donald Trump, within six months in office, struck at institutions which left them cowering 'in a corner' instead of resisting
1 day ago
David Carr vowed to counter socialist-inspired proposals like city-run grocery stores, calling them a failed ideological experiment
2 days ago
Marco Rubio confirmed the Trump admin had ended ties with 66 global groups, citing taxpayer accountability and rejecting 'ineffective' institutions
2 days ago
Chris Murphy proposed a bill to curb DHS powers by banning face coverings, limiting interior raids, and boosting transparency after Renee Good's death
2 days ago
Federal Judge Arun Subramanian issued a 14‑day restraining order, saying states had met the legal threshold to preserve aid programs
2 days ago
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins cited Feeding Our Future, housing aid abuse, and daycare fraud probes to justify the funding freeze
2 days ago
Jack Smith's team welcomed public scrutiny, with attorney Lanny Breuer noting he had long offered to testify openly and never resisted transparency
3 days ago