Trump predicts massive repayment burden if tariffs are struck down by Supreme Court

President Donald Trump warned that a Supreme Court ruling against tariffs could hurt the economy, forcing the US to repay billions
PUBLISHED JAN 12, 2026
Supreme Court prepared to rule on tariff powers, examining whether President Donald Trump had exceeded authority under national security laws, while he maintained that tariffs had driven strong economic growth (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Supreme Court prepared to rule on tariff powers, examining whether President Donald Trump had exceeded authority under national security laws, while he maintained that tariffs had driven strong economic growth (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: President Donald Trump warned on Monday, January 12, that the US economy could face severe consequences if the Supreme Court struck down the tariffs he had imposed on a wide range of imports.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote that the country would be “SCREWED!” if the high court ruled against what he described as a “National Security bonanza.”

The warning came as the Supreme Court prepared to issue a decision in a case challenging the president’s authority to impose sweeping import taxes without congressional approval, a central pillar of Trump’s trade agenda.

High court ruling expected very soon



The case is expected to be resolved in the coming days, with a ruling possible as early as Wednesday. At issue is whether Trump exceeded his authority by invoking national security laws to levy broad tariffs on foreign goods.

In his post, Trump said that an adverse ruling would expose the federal government to massive repayment obligations.

“The actual numbers that we would have to pay back if, for any reason, the Supreme Court were to rule against the United States of America on Tariffs, would be many Hundreds of Billions of Dollars,” he wrote.

Payback costs could reach trillions

SAN PEDRO, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 01: Container ships and shipping containers (C) are viewed at the P
The president claims the cost of reimbursing companies for investments made to avoid tariffs would be 'almost impossible' for the country to pay (Getty Images)

Trump argued that the financial exposure would extend beyond refunded duties. He said companies and foreign governments have invested heavily in new plants and supply chains designed to avoid the tariffs.

“When these Investments are added, we are talking about Trillions of Dollars!” Trump wrote. “It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country to pay.”

He rejected the idea that any refund process would be straightforward, saying it would take years to determine “who, when, and where, to pay.”

Tariffs credited for huge economic growth

NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 15:  Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a lunch hoste
Donald Trump credited the tariffs for the 4.3% annualized growth rate recorded between July and September (Getty Images)

The president has repeatedly credited tariffs for the recent economic performance. After the Commerce Department reported last month that the economy grew at an annualized rate of 4.3% between July and September, Trump attributed the gains to his trade policies.

“The TARIFFS are responsible for the GREAT USA Economic Numbers JUST ANNOUNCED…AND THEY WILL ONLY GET BETTER!” he wrote at the time.

He also cited “NO INFLATION” and “GREAT NATIONAL SECURITY,” ending his message with, “Pray for the US Supreme Court!!!”

Chief Justice John Roberts labels tariffs as taxes

(Fox News)
During oral arguments, Chief Justice Roberts characterized the tariffs as 'taxes on Americans,' signaling potential trouble for the administration (Fox News)

The legal outlook remains uncertain. During oral arguments in November, Chief Justice John Roberts referred to the tariffs as “taxes on Americans,” a characterization that raised concerns among administration allies.

If the court agrees that the measures function as domestic taxes requiring congressional authorization, it could invalidate the legal framework Trump used to impose them.

Such a ruling would unwind the tariff regime and trigger the financial and policy consequences the president warned about in his post.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Leavitt defended administration's mandate for mass deportations and called for 'common sense'
14 minutes ago
Bill ends brief shutdown, funds most agencies through September amid DHS, immigration fights
26 minutes ago
GOP ekes out razor-thin win to advance funding package after leadership flips holdouts
1 hour ago
Top Republican warns federalizing elections raises constitutional issues as Johnson signals openness
1 hour ago
Johnson accused Democrats of 'obstructing' as he predicted GOP unity to pass the $1.2T funding rule
3 hours ago
House conservatives shelve SAVE Act push, clearing path for funding bill without rule changes
5 hours ago
Sanders urged Congress to debate a permanent national interest cap, arguing unchecked rates trap working families in debt despite rare agreement with Trump
12 hours ago
When it comes to fundraising, the RNC raised $172 million in 2025 while the DNC brought in $145 million
13 hours ago
Minaj, a new Trump ally, accused Democrats of lacking integrity and also labeled them 'demoncrats'
15 hours ago
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed she facilitated the call, saying Trump expressed support for agents while remaining within legal bounds
16 hours ago