Trump refuses to declare $1.8B anti-weaponization fund dead: 'It was a beautiful thing'

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers the administration had abandoned the anti-weaponization fund and would not move forward with it
President Donald Trump said he still supports the $1.8B anti-weaponization fund despite officials saying it has been abandoned (Getty Images)
President Donald Trump said he still supports the $1.8B anti-weaponization fund despite officials saying it has been abandoned (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: President Donald Trump declined on Wednesday, June 3, to confirm whether a controversial $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund has been permanently abandoned, saying he still viewed the proposal favorably despite recent statements from administration officials that it is no longer moving forward.

The proposal was designed to compensate individuals who claim they were harmed by government actions.

It has drawn opposition from several Republicans who have expressed concern that people involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack could potentially benefit from the program. 

Trump keeps fund proposal alive

Speaking at the White House, Trump declined to say whether the fund had been permanently shelved. “I’d have to ask the lawyers, I don’t know,” Trump said when asked if the proposal was fully dead or merely paused. “As far as I’m concerned, it was a beautiful thing.”



His remarks contrasted with testimony delivered by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who told lawmakers the administration had abandoned the proposal.

“We are not moving forward with the fund, period,” Blanche said during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing. When asked whether that meant permanently, Blanche replied: “Correct.”



Trump also argued that people he believes were unfairly targeted by the government should be compensated.

“And these were many great people. And I gave them pardons. I’m very proud to have given them pardons. And I think they should be reimbursed for a crooked government,” he said.



Later, speaking in the Oval Office, Trump described the fund as “so important” and referenced individuals involved in the January 6 attack. “They went there with love,” he said. “And those people have been abused.”

President Donald Trump stops to speak to reporters as he departs the White House on March 20, 2026 in Washington, DC. President Trump is traveling to Florida to spend the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump stops to speak to reporters as he departs the White House on March 20, 2026 in Washington, DC (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The administration’s position has also faced legal scrutiny. Last week, a federal judge in Virginia temporarily blocked efforts to establish the fund and prohibited any payments while litigation continues.

GOP senators seek fund's permanent end

Trump’s comments came as Senate Republicans prepared for a marathon voting session on a $70 billion immigration enforcement package that leaders hope to pass this week.

The Senate has already voted 53-46 along party lines to advance the legislation, which includes funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border security operations.

However, disagreements over the “anti-weaponization” fund have complicated efforts to secure final passage.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 16:  Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) asks a question during a Judiciary Committee hear
Sen Thom Tillis asks a question during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing titled Police Use of Force and Community Relations, in Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, June 16, 2020 (Getty Images)

Several Republican senators have pushed for language that would permanently eliminate the proposal. Senator Thom Tillis said on Wednesday, June 3, that he plans to introduce an amendment to formally end the fund. 



“I think even DOJ knows that this was a bad idea, and what we need to do is provide finality,” Tillis said. “I’ve made it very clear what I intend to do.”

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 12: U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) questions the witnesses, who were appearin
US Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) questions the witnesses during the Senate Committee for Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions hearing to examine Covid-19 and Safely Getting Back to Work and Back to School on May 12, 2020 in Washington, DC (Getty Images)

Senator John Curtis also said he was interested in ensuring the fund is fully eliminated, while Senator Bill Cassidy argued that he wanted confirmation the proposal was not merely paused.

“I want to make sure it’s not mostly dead, that it is truly dead,” Cassidy said.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Clinton offered assessments of US foreign policy, Dem party strategy, Trump’s future influence and the Supreme Court
8 minutes ago
Trump's comments especially stood out because they were delivered during a G7 press conference rather than at a campaign rally or on social media
12 minutes ago
Sean Hannity repeatedly argued that President Trump's public statements should carry more weight than the written memorandum
1 hour ago
Hillary Clinton suggested that many critics reject the Gaza plan primarily because Donald Trump proposed it, not because of what the plan contains
1 hour ago
Asked why she believes Trump continues to compare himself to Obama on Iran, Pelosi suggested it stems from the president's own record
3 hours ago
Bill Cassidy argued the deal failed to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions and instead rewarded Tehran with economic and infrastructure benefits
3 hours ago
Watch moment showing President Trump signing the Iran Memorandum of Understanding at a Versailles dinner hosted by Emmanuel Macron
5 hours ago
Pete Hegseth could access only a fraction of his travel budget until lawmakers receive records tied to overseas military operations
5 hours ago
Trump confirmed the agreement was signed during the G7 summit in France
6 hours ago
Officials say future facilities could feature drone-resistant structures and drone ports
11 hours ago