'Desperate for votes': Biden slammed amid reports White House is considering deportation relief for 1M illegal spouses of US citizens

The consideration is viewed as another strategic move by the Joe Biden administration ahead of the upcoming November 5 election
PUBLISHED APR 24, 2024
The Biden administration is reportedly mulling over granting deportation relief to those who entered the US illegally before marrying American citizens (Getty Images)
The Biden administration is reportedly mulling over granting deportation relief to those who entered the US illegally before marrying American citizens (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: In a move that could potentially affect over a million individuals, the White House is reportedly mulling over granting deportation relief to those who entered the United States illegally before marrying American citizens.

The consideration is viewed as another strategic move by the Biden administration ahead of the upcoming November 5 election, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

Potential relief for mixed-status couples

The proposal, aimed at assisting so-called "mixed-status couples," has been gaining traction since the summer of 2023, with administration officials believing that any potential backlash would be mitigated by voter sympathy for these couples.

According to estimates by the immigration advocacy group Fwd.us, approximately 1.1 million undocumented immigrants are married to American citizens.

Typically, immigrants who marry US citizens are eligible for green cards. However, many mixed-status couples face complications, with one partner being ineligible for legal permanent residency due to various reasons, including multiple illegal entries into the country or the use of forged documents.

Should the White House proceed with the plan, it is likely to implement a "parole in place" program. This program, akin to the existing one for spouses, parents, or children of active-duty military personnel and veterans, would allow eligible individuals to remain in the US in one-year increments, per the WSJ report.

EL PASO, TEXAS - FEBRUARY 01:  A U.S. Border Patrol agent speaks with Central American immigrants at
A US Border Patrol agent speaks with Central American immigrants at the border fence after they crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico on February 01, 2019, in El Paso, Texas (John Moore/Getty Images) 

Notably, any potential program would only apply to those who entered the country unlawfully, excluding individuals who overstayed their visas.

Moreover, the proposed order is expected to have specific criteria, such as a minimum duration of marriage, possibly ranging from five to ten years. President Biden has been under pressure to address border issues, even from within his own party, as sanctuary cities struggle with an influx of migrants, and chaos prevails at the US-Mexico border.

While the president has not committed to issuing executive actions to curb border crossings, he has expressed uncertainty about the extent of his authority in this regard.  “We’re examining whether or not I have that power,” Biden told Univision in an interview that aired April 9.

The administration has called on Congress to pass a bipartisan bill that includes funding for border security, blaming the lack of progress on the Republican majority in the House.

“There is no executive action — no executive action that the President can take — no matter how aggressive it could be, can deliver the significant policy reforms and additional — additional resources that Congress could have provided that Republicans rejected,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said at a press briefing in February.

Debate and criticism

The consideration of deportation relief has sparked intense debate, with critics arguing that such action would circumvent established immigration laws and incentivize illegal immigration. Matt O'Brien, director of the Immigration Reform Law Institute, criticized the potential move, labeling it as an abuse of executive authority and a departure from congressional oversight.

“The current administration has continually ignored any provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that it dislikes on ideological grounds  — and has attempted to unilaterally rewrite immigration law without the participation of Congress,” O’Brien told the New York Post.

“This is a continuation of an abusive trend, which began with DACA, and has now progressed to deliberate misuse of the parole authority and deferred enforced departure,” O’Brien continued. “I shudder to think what comes next.”

“The INA is very clear, people who broke our immigration laws don’t get a free pass simply because they marry a US citizen or have a child on US soil. And the White House has no authority to unilaterally give them one,” O’Brien added.



 

Former DHS official Ken Cuccinelli echoed these sentiments, expressing doubts about the administration's commitment to addressing fraud within the immigration system.

“There are already processes in place for the immigrant spouses of American citizens to obtain legal status,” Cuccinelli said. “They are rife with fraud that needs to be fixed, which I doubt this administration is interested in, so I suspect this is just another aspect of our immigration system that Joe Biden seems intent on making worse instead of fixing.”

Social media rips into Biden over amnesty plan

The news of the potential deportation relief sparked a flurry of reactions on social media, with many slamming President Biden.

"Where does he get this Mass Amnesty Power?" one posted on X.

"Why? Why can't they do it the old-fashioned way? You know; pay the fees, go through the process, sign the affidavit saying they won't become a burden (and enforce it), get the vaccinations, etc," another wrote.

"This guy is so desperate for votes," someone else commented.

"How much damage do we think he can do with the time he has left in this current administration? Will we have a country left come January?" another wondered.



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Karoline Leavitt called reports 'bad' and 'not true,' saying the United States set clear red lines and feels positive about a deal
1 hour ago
Mehmet Oz said Donald Trump defended drinking soda on Air Force One, joking it 'kills cancer cells' and is 'fresh-squeezed'
2 hours ago
Melania Trump made foster care a priority post-White House, backing 'Fostering the Future' launched by President Donald Trump
2 hours ago
Hilton targets Steyer’s immigration policies during campaign segment as rivalry sharpens
6 hours ago
Fourth attempt to curb Trump's war powers failed in the Senate as the measure fell short amid a party-line split over executive military authority
7 hours ago
Sanders says, 'the American people have had enough,' ahead of the Israel arms vote
8 hours ago
Treasury Secretary Bessent projected $3 gas, linking potential price drops to progress in diplomacy and improved global shipping conditions.
8 hours ago
House Speaker defends Trump as clash with Pope Leo escalates over Iran war and moral authority
9 hours ago
'More than 53 million filers claimed at least one of President Trump's signature new tax cuts', Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said
9 hours ago
Resolution claims Hegseth misused authority, hurt military credibility and NATO ties
9 hours ago