DOJ refuses to unseal more Epstein files, says it has already complied with law

The Justice Department argued it didn't need to release more records publicly but offered the judge additional details in closed session
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche repeatedly defended the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files despite bipartisan criticism (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche repeatedly defended the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files despite bipartisan criticism (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

WASHINGTON, DC:  The Department of Justice has now refused to release additional records from its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, telling a federal judge it had already complied with the law.

The response came just hours before a court-imposed deadline to either unseal at least a dozen documents or explain why they could not be released.

The records include email exchanges with Epstein about a purported “torture video” and interviews with a woman who accused President Donald Trump of wrongdoing.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s attorneys told District Judge Emmet Sullivan that Blanche’s department has “devoted incredible time and resources” to reviewing more than 6 million documents in connection with the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA).

“As will become apparent, it would contravene the settled application of the EFTA for the Department to produce unredacted versions of many of the records at issue, and nothing requires that result,” Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward wrote.

Jeffrey Epstein
DOJ refused to release additional records from its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein (Getty Images)

DOJ cites victim privacy in withholding records

The DOJ argued that the law allows it to withhold or redact records containing victims’ identities or information that could compromise an ongoing federal investigation.

It also said the names of senders and recipients were blacked out in several emails because they identified victims or included private email addresses.

“One of the complicating aspects of administering the EFTA is that many communications written by victims, without context, can appear disturbing on their face,” Stanley Woodward wrote.

“Consistent with that statutory authority, the Department has sought to prevent victim PII from becoming public even in instances where the victims eventually became complicit or engaged in reprehensible activity or communications,” he added.

DOJ building (Getty Images)
The DOJ argued that the law allowed records to be withheld to protect victims and the investigation (Getty Images)

FBI interview records withheld due to technical issues

As for a set of FBI interview notes, Woodward said those could not be produced because of “technical limitations” in ensuring that handwritten materials are free from private victim information.  

The Justice Department argued that it should not be required to release any additional records to the public but said it was willing to provide further details to the judge during closed-door proceedings.

The department also requested a 60-day extension to allow the solicitor general to consider a possible appeal if the court orders further action.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks at a news conference to announce an update on the Epstein files at the Department of Justice on January 30, 2026 in Washington, DC. Blanche announced that the department had released three million additional pages in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks at a news conference to announce an update on the Epstein files at the Department of Justice on January 30, 2026, in Washington, DC (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The filing stems from a lawsuit brought by attorney and independent journalist Katie Phang, who alleged that the DOJ violated the transparency law by withholding records.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has repeatedly defended the administration’s handling of the Epstein files despite bipartisan criticism over the rollout.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Critics are arguing that Trump's remark about two Californian cities is evidence that he is mentally unfit to rule, prompting calls to invoke Section 4 of the amendment to remove him from office
1 hour ago
David Hearn’s attorneys want DOJ and Interior watchdogs to investigate a felony prosecution that ended after contractor errors emerged
2 hours ago
Kalshi is adding accuracy, liquidity and trade data disclosures as it heads into a high-stakes midterm cycle after a major Wisconsin miss
2 hours ago
Thomas Tillis said his biggest concern was Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr, and his decision to accept financial help from a Russian oligarch to fund his wedding
2 hours ago
A federal judge ruled that the federal government’s decision to impose fines on migrants was unlawful, writing that migrants in the “economically precarious position” of responding to the fines could be pushed into “insolvency”
4 hours ago
White House calls the spots public service announcements as watchdogs and lawmakers question whether federal rules permit the spending
5 hours ago
The president accuses Fox News of giving opposition candidates more airtime while demanding greater coverage of his Republican campaign events
6 hours ago
Trump once again called the consequences of the war with Iran a 'small price to pay for keeping the world safe,' adding that Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego
6 hours ago
Ken Paxton adviser Nick Maddux said he was referring to super PACs, not Donald Trump, when discussing campaign control
14 hours ago
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin claimed Democrats know they have to 'change the demographics' to turn the US into 'a socialist country'
15 hours ago