Former Sen Melissa Melendez slams California law on gender-neutral sections in toy stores on 'Fox & Friends'

Melissa Melendez featured on 'Fox & Friends' to discuss the California law that makes it compulsory for toy stores to have a gender-neutral section
PUBLISHED DEC 31, 2023
Melissa Melendez criticized the California law for a gender-neutral toy section, which must be complied to by January 1, 2024, on 'Fox & Friends' (Fox News)
Melissa Melendez criticized the California law for a gender-neutral toy section, which must be complied to by January 1, 2024, on 'Fox & Friends' (Fox News)

NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: Melissa Melendez, former Republican senator from California, appeared on the December 28 episode of 'Fox & Friends' to talk about a state policy for toy stores.

The Democrat-backed law in question makes it compulsory for toy stores across the state to have gender-neutral toy sections, a move that Melendez calls "beyond absurd."

Who wrote the Californian toy store bill?

California Democrat lawmaker Evan Low wrote the bill, which was passed back in 2021, according to Fox News.

At the time, Low had reportedly told CBS News, "We need to stop stigmatizing what's acceptable for certain genders and just let kids be kids." He held hopes that the passage of the bill would help stop the reinforcement of "outdated stereotypes."

The controversial policy does not outlaw gendered toy sections, reported Fox News. However, it mandates stores with more than 500 employees to also compulsorily provide gender-neutral sections for children aged 12 and under.

The stores have a deadline of January 1, 2024, to comply, after which they may be fined from $250 to $500, depending on the number of violations.

Melissa Melendez Carley Shimkus (Fox News)
Melissa Melendez, in a conversation with Carley Shimkus, criticized California state's bill mandating a gender-neutral section in toy stores (Fox News)

Melissa Melendez's criticism of gender-neutral toy section policy

Speaking with co-host Carley Shimkus, Melendez, who voted against the bill, stated, "I was really stunned, number one, because the author of the bill doesn't have any children, so he has no idea what it's like to go to stores scrambling to try to find that toy for your child's birthday or Christmas, rush home to make dinner or take care of the family."

She continued, "He has no idea, so I was stunned that someone without children was so focused on controlling how I shop for my children."

Making her stand against government interference, Melendez shared, "There are some retailers who have already decided to start doing this, and that's probably how it should be, rather than the government trying to step in and co-parent with parents in California."

"Let retailers decide what's best for their customers and what their clientele want, but the last thing we need is for the state legislature in California to decide, 'Parents, this is how you need to shop for your children,'" she continued.

She further criticized the law as she said, "It's policies like these that are terrible for people living in California and in any other states are choosing to do this. We don't need the government trying to co-parent with us."

Mentioning the state of the economy, the former lawmaker later added, "For goodness sake, we have a $68 billion budget deficit in California. I'm pretty sure we could probably be focusing on some things other than the toy section at our local Target."

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Newsom accused Trump of self-dealing and cronyism, saying his tariff push reflects desperation and weak leadership
44 minutes ago
At the WH, Trump said the ruling is contradictory as he can take harsh trade action against countries but cannot impose even a small tariff fee
1 hour ago
Omar argues only Congress can authorize military action, warning unilateral moves could drag the US into another conflict
2 hours ago
Vance says the 6-3 decision limits presidential trade powers and makes it harder to shield US jobs and supply chains
3 hours ago
Scott Bessent blasted Democrats and media, insisting the Supreme Court did not rule against Donald Trump’s tariffs
3 hours ago
The Florida lawmaker presses the president to back up his explosive claim that foreign actors swayed a key high court ruling
3 hours ago
A 6–3 ruling voids key tariff powers, leaving up to $175B in collected revenue at stake as firms warn of layoffs and stalled growth
3 hours ago
Ghislaine Maxwell’s family criticizes unequal treatment in legal cases as Andrew faces investigation over alleged misconduct as UK trade envoy
4 hours ago
The President bypasses a Supreme Court setback by utilizing Section 122 and launching Section 301 probes to protect American trade interests
10 hours ago
Trump accuses justices of fear, uses 1962 & 1974 trade acts to revive blocked tariffs
10 hours ago