House Democrats secure enough GOP support to force floor vote on ACA subsidies

In a blow to Speaker Mike Johnson, four GOP lawmakers backed a Democratic push to extend ACA subsidies, giving Democrats 218 signatures
PUBLISHED DEC 17, 2025
Four Republicans: Mike Lawler, Rob Bresnahan, Ryan Mackenzie, and Brian Fitzpatrick joined Democrats, locking in signatures and defying party leadership (Getty Images)
Four Republicans: Mike Lawler, Rob Bresnahan, Ryan Mackenzie, and Brian Fitzpatrick joined Democrats, locking in signatures and defying party leadership (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: House Democrats have gathered enough bipartisan support to force a floor vote on extending Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, using a rarely successful discharge petition to bypass Republican leadership.

Rep Katherine Clark, the House Democratic whip, announced that the petition reached the required 218 signatures, ensuring the measure can be brought to the floor despite opposition from GOP leaders.

“House Democrats’ discharge petition has 218 signatures. This is how we fight back for the American people. Mike Johnson needs to bring up a vote to lower premiums today. This is how we fight back for the American people,” Clark said in a post on X.



Four Republicans break with leadership to sign the petition 

The four Republicans who joined Democrats in signing the petition are Reps Mike Lawler of New York, Rob Bresnahan of Pennsylvania, Ryan Mackenzie of Pennsylvania, and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. 

Fitzpatrick was the first GOP lawmaker to add his name. Once a discharge petition reaches 218 signatures, those signatures are locked in.

After seven legislative days, any signer may move to force a vote on the legislation. With the House leaving Washington on Friday, that vote is not expected until the new year.

In the face of a lack of significant efforts by congressional Republicans to extend the credits, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, in November, created a discharge petition, which would force a vote on such an extension once it obtained signatures from 218 House members.

(Getty Images)
Brian Fitzpatrick said allowing the subsidies to lapse would be the worst possible outcome(Getty Images)

Lawmakers warn of consequences if subsidies lapse 

Fitzpatrick said that allowing the subsidies to lapse would be the worst possible outcome.

“As I’ve stated many times before, the only policy that is worse than a clean three-year extension without any reforms is a policy of complete expiration without any bridge,” he said. “Unfortunately, it is House leadership themselves that have forced this outcome.”

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) speaks to reporters as he arrives for a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Republicans met to discuss the Republican budget bill as they attempt to bring it to the floor next week for a vote. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Rep Mike Lawler (R-NY) speaks to reporters as he arrives for a House Republican caucus meeting at the US Capitol on May 15, 2025, in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Lawler echoed that sentiment, saying congressional inaction left lawmakers little choice.

“When leadership blocks action entirely, Congress has a responsibility to act,” he said, adding that his priority was ensuring families in New York’s Hudson Valley are not harmed by legislative gridlock.

GOP health bill moves without subsidies

The procedural push comes as the House prepares to vote on a Republican-led health care bill later on Wednesday.

The measure includes provisions to codify 'Association Health Plans', expand so-called “choice arrangements,” and increase transparency requirements for pharmacy benefit managers. Notably, the bill does not include an extension of ACA subsidies.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 30: U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), joined by fellow House Democrats, speaks at a press conference outside of the U.S. Capitol on September 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. House Democrats demanded that Congressional Republicans negotiate with them on spending to avoid a federal government shutdown that is set to begin at midnight if no deal is struck. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), joined by fellow House Democrats, speaks at a press conference outside of the US Capitol on September 30, 2025, in Washington, DC (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Republican leadership aides had previously suggested that an amendment addressing the subsidies was under development, but Speaker Mike Johnson said on Wednesday that he would not call a vote on such a measure, effectively guaranteeing that the subsidies will expire at the end of the year unless the discharge petition succeeds.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump lashes out at Supreme Court justices after they strike down his emergency tariffs, sparking Maher’s satirical take
1 hour ago
The Capitol Rotunda honor is reserved for presidents, top officials, and select civilians; Jackson’s family plans local memorials instead
2 hours ago
Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie said they will bring Epstein survivors, with up to 12 victims expected to attend
3 hours ago
Pritzker says Trump’s tariff policy harmed Illinois families and farms, calling for $8.6B in direct compensation after Supreme Court ruling
3 hours ago
Nancy Pelosi said the Supreme Court rightly struck down the tariffs, upholding the Constitution while 'rejecting an abuse of executive power'
3 hours ago
Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued tariffs regulate imports and said lawmakers, not courts, should settle the trade dispute
4 hours ago
Newsom accused Trump of self-dealing and cronyism, saying his tariff push reflects desperation and weak leadership
5 hours ago
At the WH, Trump said the ruling is contradictory as he can take harsh trade action against countries but cannot impose even a small tariff fee
5 hours ago
Omar argues only Congress can authorize military action, warning unilateral moves could drag the US into another conflict
6 hours ago
Vance says the 6-3 decision limits presidential trade powers and makes it harder to shield US jobs and supply chains
7 hours ago