Khloe Kardashian’s fans use side-by-side photos to call her out over heavily edited podcast cover pic

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: Khloe Kardashian is once again under fire from fans after behind-the-scenes footage from 'The Kardashians' revealed a stark contrast between her real appearance and the heavily edited promotional image for her podcast, 'Khloe in Wonder Land.'
Eagle-eyed viewers noticed the dramatic difference between the raw shots from the photoshoot and the final image released online, sparking fresh accusations of excessive photo editing.
While the reality star looked stunning and flawless in the photoshoot footage, fans were quick to point out the extreme retouching in the final image, reigniting discussions around Khloe’s long history of Photoshop controversies, which have even included edits to her cat.
Khloe Kardashian's photoshoot for podcast cover
The April 10 episode of 'The Kardashians' featured Khloe Kardashian traveling to London and participating in several photoshoots, including one for the cover of her podcast, 'Khloe in Wonder Land'.
After the episode aired, a Reddit user sparked discussion by posting, “S6:E10 Was anyone else shocked by Khloe’s photoshoot comparison?”
In their caption, the fan shared their reaction: “When watching the show they were showing Khloe posing for her perfume photoshoot and I thought she looked great!”
However, the mood shifted when the final edited podcast cover was revealed.
“But then they showed the actual edited cover they selected and I almost spat my water out. How can anyone approve that? It doesn’t even look like her,” the Redditor wrote.
They went on to express disappointment with the overly edited image, saying, “Khloe is beautiful but she doesn’t look like this at all. It breaks my heart for her, because she doesn’t need to do all this editing. Also frustrating because she denies editing her face.”
The post included side-by-side comparisons of Khloe during the shoot and the polished podcast cover, highlighting the stark differences.
Internet calls out 'unrealistic' image of Khloe Kardashian
Several social media users quickly joined in, agreeing with the Reddit user who called out Khloe Kardashian’s heavily edited image.
One user wrote, "Jesus. That nose is not what she presents on social media."
A person explained, "Khloe facetunes and filters so much that she ends up looking like a cartoon. It is okay to edit and filter, but she takes it too far because she ends up not even looking like a person. I feel body dysmorphia is the worst with both her and Kylie (who has had the most plastic surgery) because they were deemed the "ugly sisters." They both still have a lot of issues with their appearance. Kind of exhausting."
A Redditor shared, "I don't think any of them look like their edited pics. Looks at Kris s pics lately..... it's laughable 🤣🤣"
A fan remarked, "It’s not even good photoshop. Look at the lighting on the neck??"
Another said, "This is actually insane. These are two completely different people."
One user added, "Filters & Photoshop need to be outlawed. So unrealistic……"
A comment read, "She should stop photoshooting and go on a retreat and find herself."
Khloe Kardashian’s photo editing controversies
Khloe Kardashian has reignited conversations around the reality star's long-standing history with photo editing controversies.
Over the years, Khloe and the Kardashian-Jenner family have frequently faced criticism for overly edited images.
In October 2022, she was accused of slimming her waist in a photo where she wore a black catsuit—an image she later removed from her social media.
The scrutiny continued in March 2023 when Khloe was called out for heavily retouching a photo with her friend Erin Paxton, a former production manager on 'Keeping Up With the Kardashians'.
She was also accused of Facetuning her cat, which appeared doll-like in a post last February.
More recently, in May 2024, she defended the appearance of her legs in a photo after fans claimed they looked noticeably altered, as per Page Six.
This article contains remarks made on the internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online