‘Let’s celebrate our friend for now’: JD Vance tells conservatives to pause Charlie Kirk legacy fight

WASHINGTON, DC: Vice President JD Vance called on Republicans to hold off on disputes about Charlie Kirk’s political views until after his funeral.
Vance addressed the conservative movement directly in a post on X Wednesday, asking supporters to focus on honoring Kirk’s life rather than arguing over his legacy.
To my friends on the political Right: I understand the feeling that people are putting words into Charlie Kirk's mouth. At some level, I agree and share your frustration.
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 17, 2025
Try to remember: a lot of people loved Charlie. It is natural for them to debate his views and his legacy.…
JD Vance asks conservatives to wait on Charlie Kirk debates
The appeal came as some of the loudest voices on the Right openly clashed over what Kirk truly believed.
“To my friends on the political Right: I understand the feeling that people are putting words into Charlie Kirk’s mouth. At some level, I agree and share your frustration,” Vance wrote.

“Try to remember: a lot of people loved Charlie. It is natural for them to debate his views and his legacy. In fact, I think Charlie would welcome that. But for now, let’s celebrate our friend, remember his impact, and save the debate for after his funeral."
The request followed Tucker Carlson's claim that the Turning Point USA founder “did not like Benjamin Netanyahu” and “was appalled by what was happening in Gaza.”
That sparked an immediate rebuttal from Senator Ted Cruz, who insisted Kirk was a strong supporter of Israel. “I knew Charlie well, and indeed the very last conversation we had was how deeply concerned he was about the rising, toxic wave of antisemitism on the right,” Cruz posted Wednesday.
I’m getting really tired of Tucker & his cronies falsely claiming “Charlie agreed with me that Israel is terrible & the problem in America is all the damn Jews….”
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) September 17, 2025
I knew Charlie well & indeed the very last conversation we had was how deeply concerned he was about the rising,… https://t.co/U0NzAMddO0
Candace Owens alleges pressure campaign, Bill Ackman pushes back
Others raised questions about outside influence on Kirk’s politics.
Candace Owens claimed hedge fund boss Bill Ackman staged an “intervention” to push Kirk into a more pro-Israel stance.
Ackman dismissed that, calling it absurd and sharing text messages showing he and Kirk had simply planned to meet for dinner in New York City this fall.
A few facts, corrections, and receipts to dispel some misinformation going around social media:
— Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) September 17, 2025
The @TPUSA Hamptons event was not held at my house, but rather at a hotel in Bridgehampton. As I previously explained, I did cover the cost of the event, ie, travel, food, and lodging… https://t.co/Qi4cN8Bjy1 pic.twitter.com/MBf2UExe2O
Carlson, meanwhile, attacked foreign leaders for issuing what he called “disgusting” tributes to Kirk while speaking to Vance on “The Charlie Kirk Show."
Tucker Carlson slams Benjamin Netanyahu for exploiting Charlie Kirk’s death.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) September 15, 2025
He calls it disrespectful for any foreign leader to claim Kirk “lived for their cause.”
Carlson insists it’s completely untrue that Kirk ever lived for Netanyahu’s agenda. pic.twitter.com/9wja36P6UT
A day later, on his own program, Carlson went after Netanyahu, describing his conduct as “ghoulish and really repulsive” after Kirk’s murder.
⚡️🇺🇸🇮🇱BREAKING: Tucker Carlson slams Israel’s PM Netanyahu and reveals what Charlie Kirk told him about Netanyahu, Gaza & Israel using the U.S to fight its wars:
— Suppressed News. (@SuppressedNws1) September 17, 2025
“I was shocked and sickened by the reaction of the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of the prime minister of in… pic.twitter.com/5w85co4IhM
Internet reacts to JD Vance call for unity after Charlie Kirk death
Vance’s plea drew mixed reactions online.
“I actually blame you for amplifying Tucker immediately after Charlie’s passing. Either call Tucker out by name or be quiet,” one user wrote.
I actually blame you for amplifying Tucker immediately after Charlie’s passing. Either call Tucker out by name or be quiet.
— Florida Dad (@FLDadReborn) September 17, 2025
Another posted, “This statement is disappointing. These people are saying that Charlie was two-faced and said one thing in public and another in private. These people are insinuating that ‘the Jooz’ had something to do with his death. You should be condemning this. Eventually, it will be time to vote. You are giving me concerns about voting for YOU.”
This statement is disappointing. These people are saying that Charlie was two faced and said one thing in public and another in private. These people are insinuating that "the Jooz" had something to do with his death. You should be condemning this. Eventually, it will be time…
— Poetrypainter (@poetrypainter) September 17, 2025
Some defended Vance’s tone, with one noting, “When there are hundreds of millions of people on the internet—many of them anonymous—it’s no surprise to find thousands who stir the pot for attention or clicks. This was a short story about social media.”
When there are hundreds of millions of people on the internet - many of them enjoying the luxury of anonymity - no one should be surprised to find thousands who "get off" on stirring the pot for attention or clicks.
— Craig Chamberlin (@CraigChamberlin) September 17, 2025
This was a short story about Social Media.
Others praised the vice president’s words. “JD is gonna be president in 2028 at this rate. Incredibly well said,” wrote one. Another added, “Charlie meant many different things to many different people. We should be uniting over the good that he brought into our lives.”
JD is gonna be president in 2028 at this rate.
— Emerald Apple (@AI_EmeraldApple) September 17, 2025
Incredibly well said!
Charlie meant many different things to many different people.
— Cancel Me Gently (@CenteredRight) September 17, 2025
We should be uniting over the good that he brought into our lives. 💯
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online