Peter Navarro says new Trump-released records make 2020 election theft claims more believable

WASHINGTON, DC: President Donald Trump’s Senior Counselor for Trade and Manufacturing, Peter Navarro, insisted Trump's primetime speech was about protecting future elections while arguing that the administration's newly released records should make more Americans believe the 2020 election was stolen.

Navarro pushed back on suggestions that Trump's address was an attempt to relitigate the last presidential race. At the same time, he argued the newly declassified material should shift public opinion about the disputed election claims.

Peter Navarro defends Trump's election message

Speaking to reporters outside the White House on Friday, July 17, Navarro said the president's speech was being misunderstood.

"What I want to start with is facts," Navarro said. "There's a simple fact that the American people have lost a lot of confidence in our election system, and there is a deep, deep, deep division on whether the 2020 election was stolen."

He then rejected the idea that Trump's speech was centered on that debate.

"That's not what last night was about," Navarro said. "What last night was about is protecting future elections."

Even so, Navarro argued the records released by the administration should change how Americans view the 2020 election.

"The question, I think the way to frame the way to think about this is, based on what was released... is the probability that that election was stolen higher today in people's minds than it was before we got the data," he said.

Navarro added that people who previously believed there was little chance the election had been stolen should see that probability "creep up a little bit," while those who already believed it "is going to maybe pop to certainty."

Trump links China to 2020 election

During Thursday night's address, Trump claimed, "China was working to influence... the results of the 2020 presidential election itself."

He also said US intelligence agencies discovered that "tens of millions of voter data... in 18 states have been bought, stolen or hacked by China," adding that "those responsible for sounding the alarm instead kept the information secret and hidden."

The documents, however, were described differently by the New York Times, which reported they "outline some nascent interest by Chinese officials in influence operations" but also "concede Beijing never endorsed any broad-based effort to undercut Mr Trump."

Documents fuel competing interpretations

The released material also drew attention because of comments from John Solomon, who is leading Trump's task force on declassifying documents across several issues, according to the outlet.

The outlet reported that Solomon told reporters outside the White House that intelligence community documents "show no evidence that votes in election machines were changed in the past three elections."