Podcaster reveals how Taylor Swift probably perceives prices for day-to-day items and fans are blown away
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa45/7fa45afd7be1ccacbc37613da8c5628484811a11" alt="Podcaster reveals how Taylor Swift probably perceives prices for day-to-day items and fans are blown away"
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: Fans of Taylor Swift are reeling following a podcaster's recent revelation about the pop star's perspective on money.
This comes on the heels of Forbes naming the 'Lover' singer the highest-earning female musician in the world, boasting a staggering net worth of $1.6 billion. With such wealth, it's no wonder that Swift lives a life free from financial concerns, but her apparent viewpoint on everyday expenses has left many feeling alienated, as per The Express.
Also Read: Chiefs coach Andy Reid defends 'good girl' Taylor Swift after she was booed at Super Bowl LIX
@allegedlyspeaking We will never emotionally (or financially) recover from this 😅 @Jana Rosenberg @Liv Pearsall #taylorswift #erastour #erastourtaylorswift ♬ original sound - Allegedly Speaking
Podcaster sheds light on Taylor Swift's surprising perspective on money
In a recent episode of the 'Allegedly Speaking' podcast, host Jana Rosenberg shared startling calculations that illustrate just how different Taylor Swift's financial reality is from that of the average American.
By comparing her annual income to common consumer goods, Rosenberg painted a picture that shocked her co-host, Liv Pearsall, as well as the audience.
Rosenberg said, "So I recently found out Taylor Swift's POV (point of view) on money, so essentially, what this means is that I’m taking her annual salary based on her net worth and comparing it to her purchasing regular items in life."
Also Read: Taylor Swift’s overheard date night 'baby talks' hint at her future plans with Travis Kelce
She explained how a $1,200 iPhone would feel like spending just $1.87 for Swift, while a pair of Lululemon leggings costing $98 would equate to a mere 11 cents for the pop star.
The disparity only grew more pronounced with larger purchases, such as a 2024 Toyota RAV4, priced at $28,675, which would feel like a negligible £32.66 missing from Swift's account.
Even her extravagant dining habits were put into perspective. A typical dinner for two at Nobu Malibu, usually around $700, would only feel like 81 cents to the billionaire artist.
Fans share their thoughts on Taylor Swift's POV on wealth
This mind-boggling view of wealth and spending has sparked outrage among fans and netizens, who feel disconnected from her perspective.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55f49/55f49f23c7650198f52b2026f2f2cfe956b049bb" alt="Taylor Swift performs onstage during"
One wrote, "This is why famous people’s presidential endorsements should not matter because cost of living doesn’t affect them at all," referring to the pop star's endorsement of Kamala Harris.
Another said, "This means that when Taylor was giving her tour crew $10,000 bonuses, it really felt like $16."
"Only rich people say money doesn’t buy happiness. Money would solve so much stress for me. Doesn’t even have to be millions!" exclaimed an individual.
Someone else expressed, "I feel so poor and broke. Makes me feel I am in debt but I am not."
Another expressed frustration at celebrities discussing economic issues, stating, "This is why it’s frustrating when celebrities talk about the economy when encouraging people to vote, because whatever the outcome of this election will never affect them."
"Me feeling guilty for spending $13 on lunch and an iced coffee," quipped a person, while one more simply said, "This made me angry."
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.
More from MEAWW
Kate Hudson shares bold praise for Taylor Swift's icon status: 'She has done something so amazing'
Fact Check: Did a woman divorce her husband because he booed Taylor Swift at Super Bowl LIX?