Judge Aileen Cannon slammed after postponing Trump's classified documents case indefinitely

PALM BEACH, FLORIDA: A federal judge in South Florida has made a decisive move, scrapping the planned May 20 trial start date in the case concerning former President Donald Trump's handling of classified documents.

The decision, delivered by US District Judge Aileen Cannon, is anticipated to push the trial beyond the upcoming November 5 election.

Judge Aileen's rationale behind pushing trial 

In a detailed five-page scheduling order issued on Tuesday, May 7, Judge Cannon articulated the complexities surrounding the case and emphasized the necessity to address various pre-trial motions and critical issues under the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) before setting a trial date.

“The Court ... determines that finalization of a trial date at this juncture—before resolution of the myriad and interconnected pre-trial and CIPA issues remaining and forthcoming—would be imprudent and inconsistent with the Court’s duty to fully and fairly consider the various pending pre-trial motions before the Court, critical CIPA issues, and additional pretrial and trial preparations necessary to present this case to a jury,” Judge Cannon stated in her order Tuesday.

“The Court therefore vacates the current May 20, 2024, trial date (and associated calendar call), to be reset by separate order following resolution of the matters before the Court, consistent with Defendants’ right to due process and the public’s interest in the fair and efficient administration of justice,” she added.

The trial, initially scheduled by Cannon for August 2023, has faced persistent delays, with the recent order indicating a likelihood of proceedings commencing no sooner than August this year. Trump's legal team has argued against a trial occurring close to the November election, citing potential political interference with the former President's campaign activities.

The legal battle revolves around allegations that Trump unlawfully retained sensitive documents after leaving office in January 2021 and obstructed federal efforts to retrieve them. Trump, the first former US president to face criminal charges, maintains his innocence, pleading not guilty to the 40 criminal counts leveled against him in the Florida case.

Amidst the legal turmoil in Florida, Trump is concurrently facing trial in Manhattan on a 34-count indictment related to business records falsification. The New York case shares legal representation with the Florida proceedings, forming part of the 88 counts spanning four indictments against Trump.

In a separate legal saga, the Supreme Court is deliberating on Trump's immunity from federal prosecution in a case alleging conspiracy to unlawfully retain power post the 2020 election loss. Furthermore, an indictment in Georgia for alleged 2020 election tampering adds to Trump's legal entanglements.

Trump's legal strategy appears focused on delaying trials while he pursues a third consecutive presidential bid. If successful in postponing proceedings until after the election and reclaiming the presidency, Trump could potentially influence the Justice Department's handling of ongoing prosecutions, the New York Post reported.

Social media backlash

Critics of Trump on social media blasted Judge Cannon following the decision, with some questioning her competence and impartiality.

"Gee, that’s a shame," one posted on X.

"That has to be a joke, she’s incompetent," another fumed.

"That's kind of a national security risk. Judge Trumplican has to be removed," someone else insisted.

"Another example of a miscarriage of justice!" a comment read.

"She is totally in over her head," another chimed in.

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.