Trump official hits back at Newsom’s claim DOJ has ‘no business’ monitoring California election

The DOJ deployed election monitors to California twice under Biden, during the 2022 and 2024 general elections, to ensure fair voting practices
PUBLISHED OCT 26, 2025
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the Justice Department’s plan to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of the November 2025 elections (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the Justice Department’s plan to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of the November 2025 elections (Mario Tama/Getty Images)


WASHINGTON, DC: California Governor Gavin Newsom’s criticism of the Justice Department’s (DOJ) plan to oversee California’s election has drawn swift backlash. Newsom said the DOJ has 'no business' during the election time in November 2025.

Now, Harmeet Dhillon, DOJ’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, countered Newsom’s remarks by noting that the department has routinely deployed election monitors to regions with prior voting concerns to ensure compliance with federal election laws.

“Lol calm down bro,” Donald Trump's official, Dhillon wrote on X, reposting Newsom’s video on Saturday, October 25.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom campaigns for President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's
California Gov Gavin Newsom campaigns for former President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's 'BBQ for Biden-Harris' event on July 4, 2024 in South Haven, Michigan (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

Donald Trump's official hits back at Gavin Newsom over DOJ’s decision to deploy federal election observers 

Gavin Newsom sparked backlash after criticizing the Justice Department’s decision to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of next month’s elections. 

In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Newsom accused the DOJ of political interference, calling it “Donald Trump’s puppet.”

He said, “DOJ has no business screwing around with next month's election. Sending the feds into California polling places is a deliberate attempt to scare off voters and undermine a fair election.”



His comments quickly drew a fiery response from Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and a Trump administration official. “Lol calm down bro,” Dhillon wrote on X. “The @TheJusticeDept under Democrat administrations has sent in federal election observers for decades, and not once did we hear that this was voter intimidation from states such as California. Do you really want to go there? Isn’t transparency a good thing?”

Newsom has not yet replied to Dhillon's comment.

Adding to the backlash, Dr Houman Hemmati also weighed in on X, writing, “Hey @GavinNewsom WHY would any legitimate voter be ‘scared off’ by having federal election observers? Most people think legitimate voters would be more likely to vote because they’d trust the process. But clearly you’re afraid of something. I wonder what that is…”



Is Justice Department's election oversight new?

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 25: Travelers arrive alongside patrolling National Guard soldiers at Union Station on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has deployed federal officers and the National Guard to the District in order to place the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and assist in crime prevention in the nation's capital. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Travelers arrive alongside patrolling National Guard soldiers at Union Station on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has deployed federal officers and the National Guard to the District in order to place the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and assist in crime prevention in the nation's capital (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

No. The Justice Department’s election oversight is nothing new. Its civil rights lawyers have monitored polls for decades. While the current oversight is happening under Donald Trump’s presidency, similar measures were carried out under previous administrations.

DETROIT, MICHIGAN - OCTOBER 10: Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks at the Detroit Economic Club on October 10, 2024 in Detroit, Michigan. Michigan is considered a key battleground state in the upcoming presidential election, holding 15 electoral votes. (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump speaks at the Detroit Economic Club on October 10, 2024 in Detroit, Michigan (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

The DOJ deployed election monitors to California twice during the Biden administration, during the 2022 and 2024 general elections. Under Biden, federal election resources were also sent to several non-federal contests, including Alaska’s municipal elections in October 2023, New Jersey’s off-year general election in 2023, and Mississippi’s off-year general election that same year, as per Fox News.

Speaking about Election monitors, they are attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and US attorneys' offices nationwide. They are not federal agents or law enforcement officers but rather legal experts who ensure that polling sites comply with federal voting laws.

For decades, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division has dispatched these monitors to polling places across the country for both federal and local elections. Their mission is to uphold laws such as the Voting Rights Act, which bans intimidation or threats against voters and election workers.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

House Oversight Committee scheduled Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony for February 9, even as her lawyers vowed she would plead the Fifth
6 hours ago
Gavin Newsom dismissed Donald Trump's Greenland military threats, saying, 'I didn’t think the military force was ever real in the first place'
7 hours ago
At Davos, Trump renews Greenland push, accusing Denmark of failing to defend it and being ungrateful
7 hours ago
The documentary followed Melania Trump during the opening weeks of 2025, a pivotal period as the Trump family prepared for a return to the White House
14 hours ago
Before becoming the top law enforcer Pam Bondi was seen as a 'sweet' prosecutor with 'debilitating insecurity' who loved dogs and the gay community
14 hours ago
Tom Homan called Keith Ellison’s claims 'nonsense' and warned that interfering with federal immigration officers is a felony under federal law
15 hours ago
James Comer argued that without an official transcript, the public would be left with competing accounts, undermining transparency
16 hours ago
Trump declared that he has given strict orders for the United States to take extreme action against Iran
16 hours ago
The White House list remains posted on the administration’s website, with the inclusion of the Hunter Biden protection item
16 hours ago
James Woods accused Don Lemon of misleading coverage, saying Lemon knew more than he admitted and calling him a 'dingleberry' in American journalism
16 hours ago