Trump official hits back at Newsom’s claim DOJ has ‘no business’ monitoring California election

The DOJ deployed election monitors to California twice under Biden, during the 2022 and 2024 general elections, to ensure fair voting practices
PUBLISHED OCT 26, 2025
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the Justice Department’s plan to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of the November 2025 elections (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the Justice Department’s plan to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of the November 2025 elections (Mario Tama/Getty Images)


WASHINGTON, DC: California Governor Gavin Newsom’s criticism of the Justice Department’s (DOJ) plan to oversee California’s election has drawn swift backlash. Newsom said the DOJ has 'no business' during the election time in November 2025.

Now, Harmeet Dhillon, DOJ’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, countered Newsom’s remarks by noting that the department has routinely deployed election monitors to regions with prior voting concerns to ensure compliance with federal election laws.

“Lol calm down bro,” Donald Trump's official, Dhillon wrote on X, reposting Newsom’s video on Saturday, October 25.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom campaigns for President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's
California Gov Gavin Newsom campaigns for former President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's 'BBQ for Biden-Harris' event on July 4, 2024 in South Haven, Michigan (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

Donald Trump's official hits back at Gavin Newsom over DOJ’s decision to deploy federal election observers 

Gavin Newsom sparked backlash after criticizing the Justice Department’s decision to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of next month’s elections. 

In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Newsom accused the DOJ of political interference, calling it “Donald Trump’s puppet.”

He said, “DOJ has no business screwing around with next month's election. Sending the feds into California polling places is a deliberate attempt to scare off voters and undermine a fair election.”



His comments quickly drew a fiery response from Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and a Trump administration official. “Lol calm down bro,” Dhillon wrote on X. “The @TheJusticeDept under Democrat administrations has sent in federal election observers for decades, and not once did we hear that this was voter intimidation from states such as California. Do you really want to go there? Isn’t transparency a good thing?”

Newsom has not yet replied to Dhillon's comment.

Adding to the backlash, Dr Houman Hemmati also weighed in on X, writing, “Hey @GavinNewsom WHY would any legitimate voter be ‘scared off’ by having federal election observers? Most people think legitimate voters would be more likely to vote because they’d trust the process. But clearly you’re afraid of something. I wonder what that is…”



Is Justice Department's election oversight new?

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 25: Travelers arrive alongside patrolling National Guard soldiers at Union Station on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has deployed federal officers and the National Guard to the District in order to place the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and assist in crime prevention in the nation's capital. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Travelers arrive alongside patrolling National Guard soldiers at Union Station on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has deployed federal officers and the National Guard to the District in order to place the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and assist in crime prevention in the nation's capital (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

No. The Justice Department’s election oversight is nothing new. Its civil rights lawyers have monitored polls for decades. While the current oversight is happening under Donald Trump’s presidency, similar measures were carried out under previous administrations.

DETROIT, MICHIGAN - OCTOBER 10: Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks at the Detroit Economic Club on October 10, 2024 in Detroit, Michigan. Michigan is considered a key battleground state in the upcoming presidential election, holding 15 electoral votes. (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump speaks at the Detroit Economic Club on October 10, 2024 in Detroit, Michigan (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

The DOJ deployed election monitors to California twice during the Biden administration, during the 2022 and 2024 general elections. Under Biden, federal election resources were also sent to several non-federal contests, including Alaska’s municipal elections in October 2023, New Jersey’s off-year general election in 2023, and Mississippi’s off-year general election that same year, as per Fox News.

Speaking about Election monitors, they are attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and US attorneys' offices nationwide. They are not federal agents or law enforcement officers but rather legal experts who ensure that polling sites comply with federal voting laws.

For decades, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division has dispatched these monitors to polling places across the country for both federal and local elections. Their mission is to uphold laws such as the Voting Rights Act, which bans intimidation or threats against voters and election workers.

MORE STORIES

Donald Trump urged House Republicans to release Jeffrey Epstein files, calling the controversy a Democrat hoax and insisting he had nothing to hide
47 minutes ago
Marjorie Taylor Greene said she faced escalating safety threats after Donald Trump’s criticism, while Lauren Greene Sanders publicly defended her mother
54 minutes ago
On CNN's 'State of the Union', Marjorie Taylor Greene also faced questions about her past inflammatory posts and clarified her stance on Nick Fuentes
1 hour ago
Donald Trump mocked Marjorie Taylor Greene’s claim that his rhetoric put her in danger, saying he didn’t think her life was at risk
1 hour ago
A reporter’s question about Thomas Massie’s doubts over the Epstein probe sparked Trump’s angry pushback and renewed tensions over the push to release the remaining files
1 hour ago
Marjorie Taylor Greene said Donald Trump’s attacks triggered threats and hoax deliveries that left her family fearing escalating danger
2 hours ago
Donald Trump slammed GOP state senators for blocking a map that could add Republican House seats, and warned them to do their job or 'get out'
7 hours ago
The feud between Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene began after she repeatedly urged the administration to release all files related to Epstein
17 hours ago
A volunteer on Jose Barco’s defense team said that the veteran was not able to reach out to his family before the deportation was initiated
17 hours ago
DHS launched a federal agent surge in Charlotte, while the city opposed it, saying it fuels fear and targets people with no criminal records
17 hours ago