Trump official hits back at Newsom’s claim DOJ has ‘no business’ monitoring California election

The DOJ deployed election monitors to California twice under Biden, during the 2022 and 2024 general elections, to ensure fair voting practices
PUBLISHED OCT 26, 2025
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the Justice Department’s plan to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of the November 2025 elections (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the Justice Department’s plan to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of the November 2025 elections (Mario Tama/Getty Images)


WASHINGTON, DC: California Governor Gavin Newsom’s criticism of the Justice Department’s (DOJ) plan to oversee California’s election has drawn swift backlash. Newsom said the DOJ has 'no business' during the election time in November 2025.

Now, Harmeet Dhillon, DOJ’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, countered Newsom’s remarks by noting that the department has routinely deployed election monitors to regions with prior voting concerns to ensure compliance with federal election laws.

“Lol calm down bro,” Donald Trump's official, Dhillon wrote on X, reposting Newsom’s video on Saturday, October 25.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom campaigns for President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's
California Gov Gavin Newsom campaigns for former President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's 'BBQ for Biden-Harris' event on July 4, 2024 in South Haven, Michigan (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

Donald Trump's official hits back at Gavin Newsom over DOJ’s decision to deploy federal election observers 

Gavin Newsom sparked backlash after criticizing the Justice Department’s decision to deploy federal election observers to California and New Jersey ahead of next month’s elections. 

In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Newsom accused the DOJ of political interference, calling it “Donald Trump’s puppet.”

He said, “DOJ has no business screwing around with next month's election. Sending the feds into California polling places is a deliberate attempt to scare off voters and undermine a fair election.”



His comments quickly drew a fiery response from Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights and a Trump administration official. “Lol calm down bro,” Dhillon wrote on X. “The @TheJusticeDept under Democrat administrations has sent in federal election observers for decades, and not once did we hear that this was voter intimidation from states such as California. Do you really want to go there? Isn’t transparency a good thing?”

Newsom has not yet replied to Dhillon's comment.

Adding to the backlash, Dr Houman Hemmati also weighed in on X, writing, “Hey @GavinNewsom WHY would any legitimate voter be ‘scared off’ by having federal election observers? Most people think legitimate voters would be more likely to vote because they’d trust the process. But clearly you’re afraid of something. I wonder what that is…”



Is Justice Department's election oversight new?

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 25: Travelers arrive alongside patrolling National Guard soldiers at Union Station on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has deployed federal officers and the National Guard to the District in order to place the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and assist in crime prevention in the nation's capital. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Travelers arrive alongside patrolling National Guard soldiers at Union Station on August 25, 2025 in Washington, DC. The Trump administration has deployed federal officers and the National Guard to the District in order to place the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and assist in crime prevention in the nation's capital (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

No. The Justice Department’s election oversight is nothing new. Its civil rights lawyers have monitored polls for decades. While the current oversight is happening under Donald Trump’s presidency, similar measures were carried out under previous administrations.

DETROIT, MICHIGAN - OCTOBER 10: Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump, speaks at the Detroit Economic Club on October 10, 2024 in Detroit, Michigan. Michigan is considered a key battleground state in the upcoming presidential election, holding 15 electoral votes. (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump speaks at the Detroit Economic Club on October 10, 2024 in Detroit, Michigan (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

The DOJ deployed election monitors to California twice during the Biden administration, during the 2022 and 2024 general elections. Under Biden, federal election resources were also sent to several non-federal contests, including Alaska’s municipal elections in October 2023, New Jersey’s off-year general election in 2023, and Mississippi’s off-year general election that same year, as per Fox News.

Speaking about Election monitors, they are attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and US attorneys' offices nationwide. They are not federal agents or law enforcement officers but rather legal experts who ensure that polling sites comply with federal voting laws.

For decades, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division has dispatched these monitors to polling places across the country for both federal and local elections. Their mission is to uphold laws such as the Voting Rights Act, which bans intimidation or threats against voters and election workers.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Trump’s remark on Woods’ Masters participation gained attention after the golfer’s rollover crash raised questions about his return
5 minutes ago
The owner of the DOG pet sanctuary was surprised upon learning the puppies were adopted by the Biden family.
27 minutes ago
Handala Hackers claimed FBI was 'brought to knees' after breaching Director Kash Patel’s personal email
2 hours ago
Authorities informed that the golf legend will be housed in a separate cell as other inmates might pose a threat to him.
2 hours ago
Donald Trump made an unusual confession at the Future Investment Initiative (FII) Institute Summit
3 hours ago
Authorities say the crash happened during an overtaking attempt, with no injuries reported and Woods later facing DUI-related charges
5 hours ago
Donald Trump previously gave his blessings to Tiger Woods after he announced his relationship with the President's former daughter-in-law.
5 hours ago
Tiger Woods also faces charges for property damage and refusing to take required tests
5 hours ago
Officials from the Martin County Sheriff’s Office confirmed the crash happened recently, though details about how it unfolded remain unclear
10 hours ago