Waltz defends widespread infrastructure demolition as ‘acceptable’ war strategy

WASHINGTON, DC: US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz on Sunday, April 19, outlined the Trump administration’s position on potential next steps in the Iran conflict, stating that broader military options remain under consideration if ongoing negotiations fail.

Speaking on ABC’s This Week, Waltz said the administration is prepared to move beyond limited strikes if talks in Islamabad do not produce a resolution.

The remarks come as Vice President JD Vance prepares to lead the US delegation for high-level discussions with Iranian representatives, marking one of the most significant diplomatic engagements between the two sides in decades.

Waltz defended the administration’s approach amid criticism from some lawmakers and analysts, who have raised concerns about the scope of potential military action.

Infrastructure demolition labeled ‘escalatory ladder’

During the interview, Waltz addressed questions about targeting infrastructure, including power plants and bridges, describing such options within what he called an “escalatory ladder.”

He said infrastructure linked to military logistics and production could be considered in a broader operational context.

Responding to concerns raised by host Jonathan Karl, Waltz argued that certain facilities may serve dual-use purposes, supporting both civilian and military functions.

He referenced historical precedents to explain the administration’s position, while emphasizing that decisions would be guided by operational assessments.

Waltz also stated that US officials believe Iranian military assets are sometimes located within civilian areas, complicating targeting decisions.

The administration has maintained that any action would be evaluated within existing legal and strategic frameworks.

Operation Economic Fury triggers freefall

Alongside military considerations, Waltz pointed to ongoing economic measures as a central component of US strategy.

 He referenced efforts led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, describing a sustained campaign aimed at limiting Iran’s financial capacity.

Officials have reported significant pressure on Iran’s economy, including declines in currency value and reduced access to foreign reserves.

Estimates tied to export disruptions suggest losses reaching up to $400 million per day during peak enforcement periods.

At the United Nations, Waltz said a resolution condemning attacks on civilian infrastructure had drawn support from 135 countries.

He described the vote as indicative of broad international concern over regional stability, while reaffirming the administration’s position that Iran should not develop nuclear weapons.

No trust for ‘cute’ Iranian maneuvers

Waltz also expressed caution regarding recent Iranian statements about reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

Reports of incidents involving vessels in the region have added to uncertainty around shipping access through the waterway, which carries nearly 20% of global oil supply.

He said US naval forces remain active in the region to ensure safe passage and monitor developments.

“The United States doesn’t trust anything,” Waltz said, adding that any agreement would need to include verification mechanisms.

Officials have indicated that international inspectors, including those from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), could play a role in overseeing compliance if a deal is reached.