11 months of evidence backs the Comey case and Blanche says the '86-47' post is just one piece

Todd Blanche said prosecutors, FBI and Secret Service investigators examined the case for 11 months before presenting it to a grand jury
Todd Blanche, acting attorney general under President Donald Trump, said the case against former FBI Director James Comey went beyond the '86 47' post and involved months of evidence collection (Screengrab/ NBC News/ YouTube, Getty Images)
Todd Blanche, acting attorney general under President Donald Trump, said the case against former FBI Director James Comey went beyond the '86 47' post and involved months of evidence collection (Screengrab/ NBC News/ YouTube, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche moved to shut down growing criticism of the Justice Department’s case against former FBI Director James Comey on Sunday, May 3, insisting the indictment was not built around one viral Instagram image.

With questions mounting over whether Comey’s '86 47' seashell post alone could justify criminal charges, Blanche said investigators spent nearly a year building the case before it ever reached a grand jury.



Todd Blanche claims strong evidence against James Comey

Speaking on 'Meet the Press', Blanche made it clear that the social media image may be what the public saw, but according to him, it was only one piece of a much larger case.

“What you just showed is one part of that investigation,” Blanche said, referring to the Instagram post at the center of the controversy.

He explained that career prosecutors, FBI agents, and Secret Service investigators continued examining the matter for roughly 11 months, gathering witness accounts, documents, and other materials before presenting the case to a grand jury.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks at a news conference to announce an update on the Epstein files at the Department of Justice on January 30, 2026 in Washington, DC. Blanche announced that the department had released three million additional pages in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks at a news conference at the Department of Justice on January 30, 2026, in Washington, DC (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Blanche argued that proving intent in a threat case requires much more than a single online post and said prosecutors are prepared to prove every element of the charge in court.

He also pushed back on suggestions that the case is politically driven, stressing that the indictment ultimately came from a grand jury, not from him personally or from the Department of Justice leadership.

He asserted that he was not allowed to get into the details of the evidence against James Comey, but assured that it will be out in the open once the trial begins.

“There are constantly men and women who choose to make threatening statements against President Trump. Every one of those statements does not result in indictments, of course. There are facts, there are circumstances, there are investigations that have to take place. So this isn't a new charge we're bringing,” he said.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 08: Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence C
Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill, June 8, 2017, in Washington, DC (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

James Comey claims innocence

Comey was indicted last week over an Instagram image showing seashells arranged to read “86 47,” a phrase that sparked fierce backlash from allies of President Donald Trump, who interpreted it as a threat to the president's life.

Trump later said he “probably” believed the post endangered him, while critics questioned whether the phrase itself carries an inherently violent meaning.

Restaurant workers and even some Republican lawmakers have publicly argued that “86” is commonly used in everyday slang to mean removing or getting rid of something, not killing.



Comey has denied any violent intent and removed the post after the backlash.

The case now heads to federal court, where prosecutors will be required to prove that the former FBI director knowingly intended to make a threat.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

'The president should have stuck to his campaign pledge of keeping us out of war and focused on bringing down prices', Van Hollen said
4 hours ago
President Donald Trump reportedly triggered stunned silence among Islamic leaders by tying a regional ceasefire to recognizing Israel
4 hours ago
'If Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz are crashing out about it last night, I'd say it's a pretty good deal', Massie said about the possible Iran deal
5 hours ago
'DNC has got to do a lot better if they're going to meet this moment in history', Cory Booker said, calling for reforms to keep Democrats competitive
6 hours ago
Iran’s leader reportedly backs deal to ‘in principle’ dispose of enriched uranium
7 hours ago
'Now we are talking about a posture where we may accept the nuclear material remaining in Iran? How does that make sense at all?' Thom Tillis asked
8 hours ago
Netanyahu signals pressure on Washington as US–Iran talks move forward
8 hours ago
Trump rejects JCPOA diplomacy, maintains naval pressure, demands strict Iran enrichment limits
9 hours ago
'The deal being floated with Iran seems straight out of the Wendy Sherman-Robert Malley-Ben Rhodes playbook', Pompeo wrote
9 hours ago
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran talks, rejects claims deal would boost nuclear ambitions
9 hours ago