Ben Shapiro flags ‘conflicts of interest’ in Trump’s $230M DOJ payout push

Ben Shapiro thinks Donald Trump's move raises significant conflicts of interest that would be impossible to get around in any legal context
PUBLISHED OCT 26, 2025
Ben Shapiro criticized Donald Trump’s effort to secure a $230 million payment from the DOJ during an interview with NewsNation’s Batya Ungar-Sargon (NewsNation/YouTube)
Ben Shapiro criticized Donald Trump’s effort to secure a $230 million payment from the DOJ during an interview with NewsNation’s Batya Ungar-Sargon (NewsNation/YouTube)


CHICAGO, ILLINOIS: Conservative commentator and The Daily Wire co-founder Ben Shapiro criticized President Donald Trump’s effort to receive a $230 million payment from the Department of Justice (DOJ), calling it “rife with conflicts of interest” on Saturday, October 25.

The payout is intended as compensation for the department's various probes into Trump. 

Ben Shapiro calls Trump's DOJ move a 'bad strategy'

Ben Shapiro walks the red carpet at the Turning Point USA Inaugural-Eve Ball at the Salamander Hotel on January 19, 2025, in Washington, DC (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Ben Shapiro walks the red carpet at the Turning Point USA Inaugural-Eve Ball at the Salamander Hotel on January 19, 2025, in Washington, DC (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

“I think that it’s rife with conflicts of interest,” Ben Shapiro told NewsNation’s Batya Ungar-Sargon. “I cannot see a world in which that does not end with either a massive number of lawsuits or even an impeachment in the House. That is just a bad strategy,” he added. 

“To pretend that it’s not a conflict of interest, for the president to ask the DOJ that he appointed to maybe sign him a check for $230 million, even if it’s going to go to charity, that obviously raises significant conflicts of interest that I think would be impossible to get around in sort of any legal context,” Shapiro pointed out.

Trump calls past DOJ probes 'politically motivated'

U.S. President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 3, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump announced that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, one of the largest manufacturers of semiconductor chips, plans to invest $100 billion in new manufacturing facilities in the United States. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump takes a question from a reporter in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on March 3, 2025, in Washington, DC (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

According to Donald Trump, the past DOJ investigations into his conduct were “politically motivated” and damaged his reputation. 

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as the president's personal attorney, will be one of the officials responsible for approving the settlement, which Trump has stated that he intends to donate to charity. 

Republicans and Democrats condemn Trump's DOJ move

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 16:  Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) asks a question during a Judiciary Committee hear
Sen Thom Tillis (R-NC) asks a question during a Judiciary Committee hearing in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on June 16, 2020, in Washington, DC (Getty Images)

Republicans and Democrats have raised similar concerns about the effort.

“At the very least, it’s horrible timing, given that we’re in a shutdown,” Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) told reporters earlier this week. “I got a lot of optics concerns, and I just don’t know if there’s precedent for it. There doesn’t seem to be,” he added.

Tillis also urged DOJ officials to “follow the rules” when it comes to approving any funds to be handed over to Trump. “If there’s precedent, that’s the beginning of the discussion,” he later said. “If there isn’t precedent for this sort of thing, I don’t think this is the time to establish it.” 

Senator Susan Collins (R-NE) also said Trump's effort sounds “very irregular.”

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 29: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks during the House Judiciary Subcommittee on
 Rep Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks during the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on Online Platforms and Market Power in the Rayburn House Office Building, on July 29, 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC (Getty Images)

House Democrats said they plan to investigate Trump’s push to receive damages and described it as “a blatantly illegal and unconstitutional effort to steal $230 million from the American people.”

Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Robert Garcia (D-CA), the top Democrats on the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees, wrote a letter to the president highlighting the bad timing of his push for a $230 million settlement.

“You waited until you became President and installed your handpicked loyalists at DOJ, knowing that you could instruct them to co-sign your demand notes in secret behind closed doors, and then you could present the notes to the US Treasury for cold hard cash courtesy of the American taxpayer,” the lawmakers wrote.

“That isn’t justice, it is theft,” they added.

MORE STORIES

The Goldman family first filed a claim that was a little over $117M and included the original $33M judgment from the civil case and the interest
2 hours ago
The 'Yellowjackets' star torched the former Fox News anchor on Instagram after Megyn Kelly appeared to downplay how depraved Epstein’s crimes were
3 hours ago
Despite previous critical comments, Trump insinuated plans to meet Mamdani
4 hours ago
Epstein’s newly released correspondence sparked confusion about a supposed Trump photo as Mark Epstein later clarified the 'Bubba' referenced was a private individual
5 hours ago
Laura Loomer questioned the circumstances of Rhonda Massie’s death while backing Donald Trump’s criticism of Representative Thomas Massie
5 hours ago
In a Truth Social post on Friday, Trump appeared to take a dig at Thomas Massie for his decision to remarry just a year after his first wife's death
6 hours ago
Eric Trump recounted how Barron Trump offered Joe Biden a courteous congratulatory message moments before Donald Trump delivered his combative 2025 inaugural address
6 hours ago
John Oliver argued that Megyn Kelly’s remark was a way to shield Trump from backlash amid Epstein controversy
7 hours ago
The group, a coalition of 8,000 fathers, has come together to 'protect the dignity, opportunity, and privacy' of their daughters
8 hours ago
Trump's comment came as lawmakers, including many Republicans, prepared to break with him over releasing the Epstein files
8 hours ago