Elon Musk ridicules 'joker' Gavin Newsom as California Gov signs new anti-deepfake law

Elon Musk said Gavin Newsom's law in California that attempts to regulate AI-generated content has made 'parody illegal' in the state
PUBLISHED SEP 18, 2024
Elon Musk took to X to accuse Gavin Newsom of infringing on free speech by signing his new anti-deepfake law (Getty Images)
Elon Musk took to X to accuse Gavin Newsom of infringing on free speech by signing his new anti-deepfake law (Getty Images)

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA: Elon Musk has publicly condemned California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom for signing a new law that bans deceptive political AI videos, commonly known as deepfakes.

Musk, who has been a frequent critic of Gavin Newsom, took to X to accuse the Governor of infringing on free speech, going as far as to calling him "the joker."



 

Elon Musk's criticism of Gavin Newsom's new law against deepfakes

Targeting the new law, tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has publicly endorsed Donald Trump, recently made a series of posts as he perceived it as a violation of First Amendment rights.

In one of Musk's posts on X, he reposted a deepfake video of Vice President Kamala Harris, which depicted her as an incompetent presidential candidate.

This clip is believed to have triggered Newsom’s move to push for legislation regulating such deepfake content.

On Tuesday, September 17, Newsom signed the law by fulfilling a promise he made in July 2024, targetting digitally altered political videos that could mislead voters.

However, Musk slammed Newsom's decision by posting a meme of the governor alongside the Batman villain Joker, adding the caption, “The Joker is in charge.”



 

The debate over deepfakes in politics

While some argue that deepfakes are a form of satire protected under the First Amendment, others view these content as potentially defamatory and harmful, raising concerns about how US law will handle the issue, particularly amid the presidential election.

Highlighting this ongoing debate, Musk tweeted, “You’re not gonna believe this, but @GavinNewsom just announced that he signed a LAW to make parody illegal, based on this video.”



 

Referencing the fact that his platform X moved its headquarters from California to Texas in recent years, Musk wrote, "Hard to be a free speech platform in a state that wants to ban free speech.”



 

Elon Musk’s history with AI-generated content

Elon Musk has repeatedly shared AI-generated images and videos on X that often portray Donald Trump in a positive light and Kamala Harris in a negative light.

While the Tesla CEO brands X as a champion of free speech, his platform retains the right to moderate content, including promoting, demoting, or even deleting posts.

Recently, the Supreme Court's ruling in NetChoice, LLC v Paxton affirmed the right of social media companies to moderate content as they view it fit, as protected under the First Amendment.

An Anthology of Fashion
Elon Musk has often portrayed presidential candidates Donald Trump in a positive light and Kamala Harris in a negative light in the AI-generated content he posts on X (Getty Images)

However, Musk has faced backlash for allegedly manipulating his platform to benefit his own content and has also been accused of suspending the accounts of journalists critical of Musk's actions, according to Newsweek.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

4 categories of Epstein files were defined in the records, which included court filings, FOIA materials, DOJ disclosures, and congressional documents
2 hours ago
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche claimed that President Donald Trump consistently pushed for full disclosure of the Epstein files
2 hours ago
President Donald Trump described the 'Gold Card' as a pathway for immigrants, offering a structured entry tied to financial commitment
3 hours ago
RFK Jr called the pharma agreement unprecedented as he stressed that no prior administration had achieved comparable results
3 hours ago
Pharma firms pledged $150 billion in investment and in return secured a three‑year reprieve from import tariffs to boost domestic production capacity
3 hours ago
Todd Blanche defended the DOJ’s staggered release plan for the Epstein files as he cited overwhelming volume of records
4 hours ago
DOJ insisted that the initial Epstein files deadline will be met, while further disclosures will follow a staggered release pattern to protect victims
5 hours ago
Todd Blanche said that the DOJ might miss the Epstein Files deadline and survivor Danielle Bensky called that prospect 'nerve-wracking'
6 hours ago
Todd Blanche claimed that only partial Epstein files disclosure might be possible as the Justice Department was still reviewing materials
7 hours ago
Officials said that some witnesses reported the suspect making 'barking' sounds moments before the shooting, while others claimed that he said nothing
8 hours ago