Former federal judge Michael Luttig claims constitution will disqualify Trump from higher office, but Internet isn't convinced

Michael Luttig praised the Colorado SC's approach, commending their use of a limited definition of 'insurrection'
PUBLISHED DEC 24, 2023
Michael Luttig does not think Donald Trump will win his Supreme Court appeal (YouTube/PBS, Getty Images)
Michael Luttig does not think Donald Trump will win his Supreme Court appeal (YouTube/PBS, Getty Images)

DENVER, COLORADO: The recent decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the state primary ballot has ignited a fierce debate, with Republicans accusing the move of being politically motivated.

However, former federal judge Michael Luttig, in a Saturday, December 23 MSNBC interview, defended the decision, asserting that it is the Constitution, not political bias, that could bar Trump from the ballot.

Unpacking the Colorado Supreme Court's decision

Luttig declared, "It is a natural and expected reaction by all Americans to think in terms of politics, but upon thinking about it seriously, I think it's crystal clear." He insisted that the disqualification stems from the Constitution, specifically the 14th Amendment, and not from any political maneuvering by President Joe Biden, Democrats, or anti-Trump factions.

The Colorado Supreme Court attributed Trump's responsibility for the January 6 Capitol riots as the basis for his disqualification under the 14th Amendment. Luttig praised the court's approach, commending their use of a limited definition of "insurrection" and a common-sense interpretation of the presidency as a US "office."

In response to the ruling, Luttig expressed, "It will be crystal clear to the American public that it's the Constitution of the United States that's disqualifying the former president from higher office, if he is to be disqualified." He continued, "It's not President Joe Biden. It's not the Democrats. It's not the anti-Trumpers."



 

Anticipating a Supreme Court appeal, Trump's attorneys argued that the 14th Amendment doesn't apply to the presidency. Luttig countered, stating it would be "impossible" for the Supreme Court to interpret the amendment differently than the Colorado court, emphasizing that this is a constitutional matter, not a political one.

"This is not politics. This is the Constitution of the United States," he said. "And [the case] poses for the Supreme Court of the United States a pure question of constitutional law. The Supreme Court of the United States is never to consider extra-judicial factors or considerations, such as partisan politics, or even politics writ large."

Social media not entirely convinced by Luttig's reasoning

However, many on the Internet were skeptical of the former judge's staunch assertions.

"Are you sure?" one posted on X (formerly Twitter).

"Dont hold your breath," another wrote.

"Sorry to inform you but top-notch prestigious lawyers who study the Constitution say Colorado cannot do," someone else added.

"I'm sorry, but there are too many brilliant constitutional scholars that say otherwise. Even Bill Barr, who admittedly detests Trump, even said this was a fool's errand," another offered.



 



 



 

While many on the internet questioned Luttig's assertion, his position resonated with some experts. Constitutional law scholar Mark Graber stressed that courts should act independently of political implications.

Graber, who contributed to the Colorado case, argued that there are limits to the democratic process in the name of democracy, highlighting the importance of Section 3 in covering a president under the 14th Amendment. He defended the court's decision, telling the Washington Post, "The courts should act without any consideration of the political implications of their decisions."

National precedent and legal challenges

As the legal battle unfolds, courts in other states have rejected attempts to exclude Trump from the ballot based on 14th Amendment grounds. If the US Supreme Court reviews the Colorado decision, it could set a nationwide precedent.

Trump's legal challenges extend beyond the 14th Amendment, involving criminal cases and civil suits related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Scholars recognize the unprecedented intertwining of legal and political issues in the upcoming presidential campaign, raising questions about the independence of the legal system.

Professor Stephen Vladeck from the University of Texas at Austin School of Law highlighted the complexity of the situation, stating, "We are stuck in a conundrum between what the best reading of the law is and the much more complicated high politics of how that law should be enforced."

According to Vladeck, Trump is “embroiled in massively important novel criminal and civil litigation that is in many ways about his formal and practical eligibility to run for that office in the first place.”

MORE STORIES

George Santos says Zohran Mamdani's takeover of City Hall would turn New York City into a 'very dangerous place'
5 hours ago
Chuck Schumer said that things are getting worse every day for the American people
10 hours ago
Robert De Niro said Trump 'is not going to leave the White House' and urges Americans to 'strap on their balls and do something about it'
2 days ago
The new aircraft is to be used to replace an older plane flown by Kristi Noem
2 days ago
On Tuesday, Senate Democrats blocked the GOP's eighth attempt to reopen the government
6 days ago
California already allows trans athletes to compete in school sports based on their gender identity
6 days ago
Pete Hegseth says 'Pentagon access is a privilege, not a right' as top outlets reject new media restrictions and risk losing credentials
7 days ago
Donald Trump said a very wealthy donor offered to personally cover troop pay if government shutdown funds fall short
7 days ago
The six people are from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Paraguay, and South Africa
7 days ago
President Donald Trump blamed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for the shutdown and confirmed ending several Democrat-backed federal programs
Oct 13, 2025