Internet furious as judge allows Fani Willis to stay on Donald Trump's Georgia case if deputy Nathan Wade steps aside

The ruling came after hearings veered into Fani Willis' romantic relationship with her top deputy Nathan Wade who is a special prosecutor in the case
PUBLISHED MAR 15, 2024
Fulton County DA Fani Willis hired Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor in Georgia case against Donald Trump (Getty Images, YouTube/ABC News)
Fulton County DA Fani Willis hired Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor in Georgia case against Donald Trump (Getty Images, YouTube/ABC News)

ATLANTA, GEORGIA: In a dramatic turn of events, a judge in Georgie ruled that the district attorney Fani Willis can proceed with the prosecution of Donald Trump for his alleged attempts to undermine the 2020 presidential election in the state.

However, the ruling by judge Judge Scott McAfee, who is overseeing the case, ordered the deputy to step down for Willis to continue, according to CNN


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by President Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump)


 

Willis' deputy Nathan Wade was hired to investigate Trump for the Georgia election interference case.

Judge sharply criticized Fani Willis' conduct

The ruling came after hearings veered into Willis' romantic relationship with her top deputy Wade who is also a special prosecutor in the case.

"The court therefore concludes that the prosecution of this case cannot proceed until the state selects one of two options," McAfee wrote on Friday, March 15.

"The district attorney may choose to step aside, along with the whole of her office, and refer the prosecution to the prosecuting attorneys’ council for reassignment," McAfee added.

The judge added that alternatively, the Fulton County DA could withdraw “allowing the district attorney, the defendants, and the public to move forward without his presence or remuneration distracting from and potentially compromising the merits of this case.”

Avoiding a complete removal of Willis and her office, the ruling offered relief for her. However, it also deals a blow to Willis' credibility, with judge issuing a scathing critique of her conduct during the multi-day hearing.



 

Did Fani Willis have a conflict of interest in the election case?

The issue revolved around whether the district attorney's relationship with Wade constituted a conflict of interest.

In January, Michael Roman, one of the 14 defendants in the case filed a motion seeking Willis to be disqualified from leading the case due to her personal relationship with the top deputy.

The romantic involvement remained undisclosed until Roman filed the motion. Willis and Wade eventually admitted their relationship and claimed that it began after he was assigned to work on the Trump case in 2022.

However, McAfee stated that "neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one."

Internet angry as Fani Willis is not disqualified from continuing with Donald Trump's election case

After McAfee ruled Willis could continue on the election subversion case against Trump, netizens rallied to express their disappointment with the ruling.

"So after all that, Fani Willis will not be removed from the Trump case. She was never going to be removed. Trump simply does not have a magic wand. Now onto Trump’s criminal trials and prison," a user wrote on X (formerly Twitter).



 

"He's not a good judge, he doesn't know how to judge a case. Fani Willis and her boyfriend Nathan cannot stay on the same case, this is not a family business. Both of them should be dismissed from the case. Because they have already dented the case," another user tweeted.



 

"She should be disbarred. There’s no way that she is smart or professional enough to be a lawyer," a user remarked and another user wrote, "Case is poisoned beyond recovery."



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Subpoena marks escalation in probe examining how top officials handled intelligence tied to 2016 election claims
46 minutes ago
Tulsi Gabbard said the objectives laid out by President Trump were different from those outlined by the Israeli government
5 hours ago
President Trump said that advance warning would have hurt strikes, claiming surprise let forces hit about 50% of targets in two days
6 hours ago
President Trump said oil prices rose and the economic slowdown was less severe than he had anticipated before authorizing military action
7 hours ago
'No, I'm not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you, but I'm not putting troops', President Trump said
8 hours ago
Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers that Israel targeted Iran's leadership, while US priorities focused on military capabilities
9 hours ago
Lawmakers emphasized the need for a detailed spending breakdown before considering approval of the large defense funding request
9 hours ago
Pete Hegseth noted that US forces have already struck more than 7,000 targets across Iran, while adding, 'It takes money to k*ll bad guys'
10 hours ago
Pete Hegseth emphasized that the ultimate decision on the endgame in the Iran war rests with President Donald Trump
11 hours ago
John Fetterman crossed party lines to back Markwayne Mullin in a key vote, citing the need for DHS leadership and drawing criticism from colleagues
11 hours ago