Internet furious as judge allows Fani Willis to stay on Donald Trump's Georgia case if deputy Nathan Wade steps aside

The ruling came after hearings veered into Fani Willis' romantic relationship with her top deputy Nathan Wade who is a special prosecutor in the case
PUBLISHED MAR 15, 2024
Fulton County DA Fani Willis hired Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor in Georgia case against Donald Trump (Getty Images, YouTube/ABC News)
Fulton County DA Fani Willis hired Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor in Georgia case against Donald Trump (Getty Images, YouTube/ABC News)

ATLANTA, GEORGIA: In a dramatic turn of events, a judge in Georgie ruled that the district attorney Fani Willis can proceed with the prosecution of Donald Trump for his alleged attempts to undermine the 2020 presidential election in the state.

However, the ruling by judge Judge Scott McAfee, who is overseeing the case, ordered the deputy to step down for Willis to continue, according to CNN


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by President Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump)


 

Willis' deputy Nathan Wade was hired to investigate Trump for the Georgia election interference case.

Judge sharply criticized Fani Willis' conduct

The ruling came after hearings veered into Willis' romantic relationship with her top deputy Wade who is also a special prosecutor in the case.

"The court therefore concludes that the prosecution of this case cannot proceed until the state selects one of two options," McAfee wrote on Friday, March 15.

"The district attorney may choose to step aside, along with the whole of her office, and refer the prosecution to the prosecuting attorneys’ council for reassignment," McAfee added.

The judge added that alternatively, the Fulton County DA could withdraw “allowing the district attorney, the defendants, and the public to move forward without his presence or remuneration distracting from and potentially compromising the merits of this case.”

Avoiding a complete removal of Willis and her office, the ruling offered relief for her. However, it also deals a blow to Willis' credibility, with judge issuing a scathing critique of her conduct during the multi-day hearing.



 

Did Fani Willis have a conflict of interest in the election case?

The issue revolved around whether the district attorney's relationship with Wade constituted a conflict of interest.

In January, Michael Roman, one of the 14 defendants in the case filed a motion seeking Willis to be disqualified from leading the case due to her personal relationship with the top deputy.

The romantic involvement remained undisclosed until Roman filed the motion. Willis and Wade eventually admitted their relationship and claimed that it began after he was assigned to work on the Trump case in 2022.

However, McAfee stated that "neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one."

Internet angry as Fani Willis is not disqualified from continuing with Donald Trump's election case

After McAfee ruled Willis could continue on the election subversion case against Trump, netizens rallied to express their disappointment with the ruling.

"So after all that, Fani Willis will not be removed from the Trump case. She was never going to be removed. Trump simply does not have a magic wand. Now onto Trump’s criminal trials and prison," a user wrote on X (formerly Twitter).



 

"He's not a good judge, he doesn't know how to judge a case. Fani Willis and her boyfriend Nathan cannot stay on the same case, this is not a family business. Both of them should be dismissed from the case. Because they have already dented the case," another user tweeted.



 

"She should be disbarred. There’s no way that she is smart or professional enough to be a lawyer," a user remarked and another user wrote, "Case is poisoned beyond recovery."



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The DOJ said document releases could change due to technical errors, legal reviews, or added redactions to protect privacy and follow court orders
15 minutes ago
Donald Trump endorsed Bruce Blakeman on Truth Social, praising him as MAGA and predicting a November win over Kathy Hochul
3 hours ago
The Justice Department faced fresh scrutiny after Epstein records, including images of Donald Trump, were removed without explanation from its website
4 hours ago
Thomas Massie criticized the Donald Trump admin, saying the DOJ violated transparency law by releasing Jeffrey Epstein files late on December 20
4 hours ago
Kayleigh McEnany said that a competitive primary would strengthen the nominee as Republicans considered succession plans following Trump’s second term
7 hours ago
Dick Durbin claimed that the DOJ prioritized protecting Donald Trump and other elites instead of delivering justice to the Epstein survivors
7 hours ago
Rudy Giuliani argued that ending homeless camp clearances could undo decades of progress and expose the city to rising crime risks
8 hours ago
Over 60,000 Jeffrey Epstein-linked pages were made public in 2025, but only a fraction contained new information beyond prior disclosures
9 hours ago
DOJ added court filings that detailed past Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases but noted that sensitive details like phone logs were obscured
10 hours ago
Ro Khanna accused the DOJ of failing victims through partial disclosures and shielding powerful men who blocked law enforcement from acting
10 hours ago