John Oliver roasts CNN anchor citing Civil War laws while discussing abortion rights with GOP strategist

Amidst Arizona lawmakers' push for an antiquated abortion ban, Oliver chuckled at CNN's Jim Acosta debating a Republican strategist
John Oliver took aim at the absurdities of contemporary politics, focusing on a CNN anchor's discussion of Civil War-era laws on reproductive rights (HBO)
John Oliver took aim at the absurdities of contemporary politics, focusing on a CNN anchor's discussion of Civil War-era laws on reproductive rights (HBO)

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: John Oliver, the host of 'Last Week Tonight,' has once again taken aim at the absurdities of contemporary political discourse, this time targeting a CNN anchor's recent comments on Civil War-era laws regarding reproductive rights.

According to the Wrap, in a segment discussing Arizona lawmakers' push to reinforce an antiquated abortion ban, Oliver couldn't help but chuckle at the exchange between CNN host Jim Acosta and a Republican strategist.

Jim Acosta's clumsy comparison

Acosta, attempting to emphasize the backwardness of reverting to Civil War-era laws on reproductive freedom, pointed out to the strategist, who happened to be a Black man, that women didn't even have the right to vote at that time.

“Do you really want states going back to Civil War-era laws on reproductive freedom?” the anchor asked. “I mean, women didn’t even have the right to vote at that point.”

“I mean, Jim I don’t want states going back to pre-Civil War on any issue, for obvious reasons here, right?” the strategist, with a bemused laugh, swiftly retorted, highlighting the broader implications of such a regression, prompting Acosta to acknowledge his oversight with a sheepish "point taken."

Oliver's Wit: unveiling the irony in Acosta's commentary

Oliver seized upon the moment with characteristic wit, savoring the irony of Acosta's remark in the context of addressing a Black man about the Civil War era.

"I love the cluelessness of looking at a Black man and saying that the 1860s were bad because women didn’t have the right to vote," Oliver remarked, stifling laughter. "I mean it’s true, but also, maybe not the worst thing people didn’t have the right to do back then!"

Throughout the segment, Oliver skewered Republicans for their hypocritical stance on reproductive rights, particularly their celebration of overturning Roe v Wade, only to backtrack when faced with public backlash.

"Republicans own this. They got what they wanted — overturned Roe v Wade — and now, they have to deal with the consequences of that," Oliver emphasized, his tone dripping with irony, "which hopefully will be rightfully furious constituents turning them out of office," he quipped.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Judge Amit Mehta ruled that plaintiffs showed no direct injury from the event, leaving them unable to pursue the case in federal court
40 minutes ago
Vice President JD Vance disputed the reported terms of the US-Iran agreement and criticized those who judged negotiations based on unverified reports
1 hour ago
Tulsi Gabbard accused officials of misleading Americans about taxpayer-funded biolabs and said legitimate questions were ignored for years
2 hours ago
The dispute centered on a proposed $1.776B fund that sparked controversy, with supporters saying it addressed claims of unfair government targeting
2 hours ago
Wall Street rallies, crude tumbles on optimism over potential Iran agreement
2 hours ago
Iranian state-linked outlets reported purported elements of a future agreement, sparking a dispute over the claims' accuracy and implications
4 hours ago
Donald Trump made the remark as his administration pursued a potential Iran agreement while regional tensions remained high
10 hours ago
In the Washington mayoral race, City Council member Janeese Lewis-George, a Democratic socialist, is leading former City Council Member at-Large Kenyan McDuffie (D) by double digits
10 hours ago
Cornyn criticized Trump's loyalty demands and predicted a turbulent period ahead for Republicans
12 hours ago
Advocates and attorneys are challenging the move, noting that some have US court protections against removal
12 hours ago