Judge allows Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene to sue California cities over rally cancellations in 2021, Internet says 'waste of time'

A judge permitted Matt Gaetz and MTG to sue Anaheim and Riverside for canceling 'Put America First' rallies due to their 'political views'
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene will sue two California cities for canceling their rallies in 2021 (Getty Images, Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene will sue two California cities for canceling their rallies in 2021 (Getty Images, Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: A federal judge has ruled in favor of GOP lawmakers Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene, allowing them to sue two California cities for canceling their political rallies due to their "political views," The Hill reported.

District Judge Hernán Vera, in a 22-page ruling on Friday, March 23, said both convinced the court that Anaheim and Riverside, two cities in the Golden State, canceled their event in 2021 due to "viewpoint discrimination," and permitted Gaetz and Greene to move forward with the case as per The Daily Beast.

The events in question are the 'Put America First' rallies in 2021, which were canceled, citing the Trump-supporting GOP lawmakers' divisive political stance.

The event was initially planned to be conducted in Laguna Hills, but it was moved to Riverside and then to Anaheim. Gaetz and Greene held a 'Free Speech Peaceful Protest' outside Riverside City Hall in response to the cancellation of three venues.

Judge Hernan Vera issued the ruling on March 23 (judiciary.senate.gov)
Judge Hernan Vera issued the ruling on March 23 (judiciary.senate.gov)

Judge dismisses the GOP lawmaker's accusation against liberal advocacy groups

Despite letting them proceed with suing the cities, Judge Vera criticized the Republican representatives' accusations against liberal advocacy groups, including NAACP and the League of Women Voters, of conspiring with the two Californian cities to stop their rallies.

The judge ruled that the lawsuit by Gaetz and Greene was "utterly devoid of any specifics plausibly alleging such an agreement." He added that the allegations had "numerous fatal deficiencies," and "chief among them is the complete lack of any alleged facts to support a 'meeting of the minds' as required for a conspiracy claim."

PICKENS, SOUTH CAROLINA - JULY 1: Former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures to the crowd at a campaign event on July 1, 2023, in Pickens, South Carolina. The former president faces a growing list of Republican primary challengers. (Photo by Sean Rayford/Getty Images)
Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene are strong supporters of Donald Trump (@Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

Vera slammed the hardcore Trump loyalists' attempt to blame the civil rights advocates over the events' cancellation, stating it was "both legally and literally, a conspiracy theory that relies purely on conjecture" and that accusation should "shock in equal measure civic members from across the spectrum."

Gaetz and Greene attacked civil rights organizations with baseless conspiracy claims against their right to protest, protected under the Constitution's First Amendment.

"All that is left to aver against the Nonprofit Defendants are the unremarkable allegations that they exercised their own First Amendment rights to lobby for the cancellation of the event. That is protected," the judge wrote, according to Politico.

Internet reacts

Weighing in on the court letting Gaetz and Greene sue the cities, netizens shared mixed reactions on X.

One user wrote, "What a waste of time."



 

"That is hilarious. Canceling political events for being political. And they're blind to the Irony. That's what makes them dangerous," another person remarked.



 

Whereas one user added, "I hope that ruling is overturned!"



 

"Neither are from California so why are they wanting to to hold rallies there?" one asked.



 

On the other hand someone else stated, "Well yeah. You can sue for anything in America. It doesn’t mean you will win."



 

"I hope they're using their own money to pay for their lawyers," said an individual. While another remark read, "They aren't running in CA. Tough luck."



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

According to Hassett, that domestic production means Iran's ability to influence the American economy through oil markets is limited
1 hour ago
Ron Johnson said he supported the First Amendment and argued that the federal government should avoid heavy-handed action against broadcasters
2 hours ago
Top economic official says funding sufficient for now as Pentagon sees weeks-long timeline
2 hours ago
Michael McCaul claimed Russia had provided Iran military intelligence to target US forces and shouldn't be rewarded by lifting sanctions
4 hours ago
Top Democrat renews congressional push to check presidential war powers over Iran conflict
4 hours ago
Pete Buttigieg criticized Trump's campaign for using fallen soldiers' images in fundraising, calling it morally unacceptable
5 hours ago
UN envoy says discussions underway as US seeks global support to protect vital trade route
5 hours ago
Energy chief forecasts short-term disruption as US moves to protect global oil flows
6 hours ago
Karoline Leavitt accused the New York Times of misrepresenting the Iran conflict, stressing that Americans need to be mindful of what they are reading
13 hours ago
John Fetterman said Donald Trump’s action made Iran getting a nuclear weapon 'virtually impossible,' making the world safer and the region more secure
13 hours ago