Judge allows Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene to sue California cities over rally cancellations in 2021, Internet says 'waste of time'

A judge permitted Matt Gaetz and MTG to sue Anaheim and Riverside for canceling 'Put America First' rallies due to their 'political views'
PUBLISHED MAR 24, 2024
Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene will sue two California cities for canceling their rallies in 2021 (Getty Images, Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene will sue two California cities for canceling their rallies in 2021 (Getty Images, Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA: A federal judge has ruled in favor of GOP lawmakers Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene, allowing them to sue two California cities for canceling their political rallies due to their "political views," The Hill reported.

District Judge Hernán Vera, in a 22-page ruling on Friday, March 23, said both convinced the court that Anaheim and Riverside, two cities in the Golden State, canceled their event in 2021 due to "viewpoint discrimination," and permitted Gaetz and Greene to move forward with the case as per The Daily Beast.

The events in question are the 'Put America First' rallies in 2021, which were canceled, citing the Trump-supporting GOP lawmakers' divisive political stance.

The event was initially planned to be conducted in Laguna Hills, but it was moved to Riverside and then to Anaheim. Gaetz and Greene held a 'Free Speech Peaceful Protest' outside Riverside City Hall in response to the cancellation of three venues.

Judge Hernan Vera issued the ruling on March 23 (judiciary.senate.gov)
Judge Hernan Vera issued the ruling on March 23 (judiciary.senate.gov)

Judge dismisses the GOP lawmaker's accusation against liberal advocacy groups

Despite letting them proceed with suing the cities, Judge Vera criticized the Republican representatives' accusations against liberal advocacy groups, including NAACP and the League of Women Voters, of conspiring with the two Californian cities to stop their rallies.

The judge ruled that the lawsuit by Gaetz and Greene was "utterly devoid of any specifics plausibly alleging such an agreement." He added that the allegations had "numerous fatal deficiencies," and "chief among them is the complete lack of any alleged facts to support a 'meeting of the minds' as required for a conspiracy claim."

PICKENS, SOUTH CAROLINA - JULY 1: Former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures to the crowd at a campaign event on July 1, 2023, in Pickens, South Carolina. The former president faces a growing list of Republican primary challengers. (Photo by Sean Rayford/Getty Images)
Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene are strong supporters of Donald Trump (@Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

Vera slammed the hardcore Trump loyalists' attempt to blame the civil rights advocates over the events' cancellation, stating it was "both legally and literally, a conspiracy theory that relies purely on conjecture" and that accusation should "shock in equal measure civic members from across the spectrum."

Gaetz and Greene attacked civil rights organizations with baseless conspiracy claims against their right to protest, protected under the Constitution's First Amendment.

"All that is left to aver against the Nonprofit Defendants are the unremarkable allegations that they exercised their own First Amendment rights to lobby for the cancellation of the event. That is protected," the judge wrote, according to Politico.

Internet reacts

Weighing in on the court letting Gaetz and Greene sue the cities, netizens shared mixed reactions on X.

One user wrote, "What a waste of time."



 

"That is hilarious. Canceling political events for being political. And they're blind to the Irony. That's what makes them dangerous," another person remarked.



 

Whereas one user added, "I hope that ruling is overturned!"



 

"Neither are from California so why are they wanting to to hold rallies there?" one asked.



 

On the other hand someone else stated, "Well yeah. You can sue for anything in America. It doesn’t mean you will win."



 

"I hope they're using their own money to pay for their lawyers," said an individual. While another remark read, "They aren't running in CA. Tough luck."



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

MORE STORIES

Gavin Newsom rejected the bipartisan bill, calling it too costly and warning it could disrupt how California determines firefighter pay
41 minutes ago
The vote comes as California’s education agencies face a US Department of Justice lawsuit over alleged Title IX violations in girls’ sports
1 hour ago
Donald Trump took aim at Sen Richard Blumenthal after his tense face-off with Attorney General Pam Bondi during a congressional hearing
3 hours ago
Dick Durbin pressed Pam Bondi to justify sending troops to Illinois, accusing the Justice Department of hiding key information from the public
7 hours ago
The comedian dubbed Chuck Schumer 'Hack-ie Mason', and then went on a rant against Democratic leadership in general
22 hours ago
Trump promised America’s men and women in uniform that their pay is safe despite the government shutdown
2 days ago
The stipend is part of measures taken by the Trump administration to reduce illegal immigrants in US
4 days ago
The directive followed Donald Trump’s August 2025 executive order instructing law enforcement and military to immediately arrest flag burners
4 days ago
Sen Roger Marshall introduced the Passport Sanity Act to end gender-neutral passports citing security and Trump-era precedent
5 days ago
JB Pritzker went after Trump after he suggested alleged crime-ridden cities like Chicago could serve as a training ground for National Guard troops
7 days ago