Judge blocks Trump's $400m White House ballroom, allows only underground security work

Reacting to the decision, Trump lashed out in a lengthy Truth Social post and accused the judge of political bias and undermining national security
A federal judge restricted President Donald Trump's White House ballroom project, allowing only underground construction to proceed while halting above-ground expansion (White House.gov)
A federal judge restricted President Donald Trump's White House ballroom project, allowing only underground construction to proceed while halting above-ground expansion (White House.gov)

WASHINGTON, DC: A federal judge, on Thursday, April 16, drew a firm line around President Donald Trump's ambitious White House ballroom project, allowing construction to continue only in limited, security-related areas below ground.

The ruling marks a significant setback for the administration’s plans, even as Trump argues the project is critical for national security and future presidential operations at the White House complex.

As seen from the Washington Monument, construction of the White House ballroom continues, Tuesday, March 10, 2026, where the East Wing once stood. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
As seen from the Washington Monument, construction of the White House ballroom continues on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, where the East Wing once stood (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Court limits scope of construction

In a clarification issued this week, District Judge Richard Leon said the administration could proceed with underground elements tied directly to safety, such as bunkers, protective infrastructure, and secure facilities, but rejected arguments that the entire ballroom project should move forward under that justification.

Leon pushed back sharply on the government’s position, writing that interpreting his earlier order to allow full construction would turn his exception “on its head.”

While he permitted certain above-ground work strictly tied to shielding those underground facilities, the larger ballroom structure itself remains effectively paused unless Congress authorizes it.

Donald Trump holds up a rendering of the proposed White House ballroom (@WhiteHouse/X)
Donald Trump holds up a rendering of the proposed White House ballroom (@WhiteHouse/X)

The dispute centers on a proposed $400 million expansion envisioned as a large-scale venue for state functions, with space for up to 1,000 guests.

The administration has argued the project is not merely cosmetic but intertwined with critical upgrades, including reinforced structures and advanced protective systems.

Leon’s earlier ruling had already found that no existing law clearly authorizes the president to unilaterally proceed with such a major construction effort, reinforcing that congressional approval is required.



Preservation groups that brought the case have argued the administration created urgency through its own planning decisions and cannot now cite security risks to bypass legal limits.

Trump criticizes ruling and cites security upgrades

Reacting to the decision, Trump lashed out in a lengthy Truth Social post, accusing the judge of political bias and undermining national security.

“The White House doesn’t have a Ballroom (No Taxpayer Money!), which presidents have desperately wanted and desired for over 150 years,” Trump wrote, before calling Leon a “Trump Hating” judge attempting to block a “Great Gift to America.”

He argued the project includes essential security features, listing “Bomb Shelters, a State of the Art Hospital and Medical Facilities, Missile Resistant Steel, Drone Proof Ceilings and Bullet, Ballistic, and Blast Proof Glass.”

The White House and South Lawn are seen from the Washington Monument on June 19, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)
The White House and South Lawn are seen from the Washington Monument on June 19, 2025, in Washington, DC (Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

According to Trump, without such upgrades, “no future president can ever be Safe and Secure at Events.”

Trump also questioned the timing of the legal challenge, asking why objections were not raised earlier, and warned the delay could waste “hundreds of millions of dollars” already committed to the project.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Vice President JD Vance made it clear that the administration would not lift sanctions based solely on a preliminary deal
28 minutes ago
Justice Neil Gorsuch said that the government's historical analogy failed to justify disarming regular controlled-substance users
55 minutes ago
Despite fears that tensions would disrupt a key shipping route and raise oil prices, Vance said prices stayed near pre-war levels
1 hour ago
The remarks came hours after President Trump criticized opponents who said the Iran deal was too lenient or failed to curb Tehran's ambitions
2 hours ago
Keith Sonderling warned states could lose administrative funding over unemployment fraud, calling it an unprecedented nationwide crackdown
10 hours ago
Clinton offered assessments of US foreign policy, Dem party strategy, Trump’s future influence and the Supreme Court
10 hours ago
Trump's comments especially stood out because they were delivered during a G7 press conference rather than at a campaign rally or on social media
10 hours ago
Sean Hannity repeatedly argued that President Trump's public statements should carry more weight than the written memorandum
11 hours ago
Hillary Clinton suggested that many critics reject the Gaza plan primarily because Donald Trump proposed it, not because of what the plan contains
12 hours ago
Asked why she believes Trump continues to compare himself to Obama on Iran, Pelosi suggested it stems from the president's own record
14 hours ago