Judge Tanya Chutkan resumes Donald Trump's election interference case, sets new hearing date

Donald Trump’s case was returned to Judge Tanya Chutkan and the lower court after the 32-day waiting period from the Supreme Court was over
PUBLISHED AUG 3, 2024
Judge Tanya Chutkan denied Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the  election interference case on statutory grounds (United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Getty Images)
Judge Tanya Chutkan denied Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the election interference case on statutory grounds (United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s federal election interference case has scheduled a hearing for August 16 at 10 am.

In an order filed Saturday, August 3, US District Judge Tanya Chutkan announced that the meeting would be a status conference. 

Donald Trump's motion to dismiss election interference case denied by Judge Tanya Chutkan

Donald Trump's election interference case, which was on hold after the Supreme Court carved out immunity for former presidents, appears to be back on track with Judge Tanya Chutkan's announcement.

The judge also denied Trump's motion to dismiss the case on statutory grounds.

She mentioned that they might refile the motion once issues of presidential immunity are resolved.

All parties involved are required to file a status report by August 9, jointly proposing a possible schedule for pretrial proceedings. "If necessary, the parties may explain any disagreements in separate sections of the report," Judge Chutkan stated according to The Hill.

The case is not expected to reach trial before the presidential election this fall. With the Supreme Court’s ruling, Judge Chutkan may consider how the decision affects the specifics of the case.

Former President Donald Trump made several verbal gaffes during the Philadelphia MAGA rally (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Donald Trump's election interference case is not expected to reach trial before the presidential election this fall (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump’s case was returned to the judge and the lower court after the 32-day waiting period from the Supreme Court was completed.

Special Counsel Jack Smith and the immunity issue

The new deadlines will provide insight into how Special Counsel Jack Smith plans to proceed with the Supreme Court's immunity issue.

Previously, Judge Chutkan dismissed Trump’s attempts to delay the case, stating that the election would not influence her timing decisions.

There was a possibility that the judge would allow the case to go to trial before November, but the Supreme Court decision altered the timeline. 

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 01: Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on a recently unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former U.S. President Donald Trump at the Justice Department on August 1, 2023 in Washington, DC. Trump was indicted on four felony counts for his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The new deadlines will provide insight into how Special Counsel Jack Smith plans to proceed with the Supreme Court immunity issue on Donald Trump's election interference case (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

In her order, Judge Chutkan denied Trump’s motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory grounds and stated he could file a new motion “once all issues of immunity have been resolved.”

“The court will set additional deadlines following the August 16, 2024 status conference,” she wrote.

Supreme Court's ruling and its impact on Donald Trump's election interference case

In a 6-3 ruling last month authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that a president has absolute immunity for acts within their core constitutional powers and a presumption of immunity for "acts within the outer perimeter of his official responsibility."

Judge Chutkan will be responsible for applying the Supreme Court's decision to the allegations in Trump's criminal case, including whether Trump's actions were "official acts" or private conduct that can be prosecuted according to ABC News.

Internet reaction after Judge Tanya Chutkan announces hearing of Donald Trump’s election interference case

Netizens elicited varied reactions to Judge Tanya Chutkan's announcement of hearing Donald Trump's election interference. Even as a majority of users praised the judge, some were infuriated.

"And that hearing is only 3 days before the Democratic convention... momentum is building," wrote one user on X (formerly Twitter).

Another commented, "Judge Chutkan is wasting no more time and is ready to go!"

One wrote, "Judge Chutkan rocks!" Another reaction read, "Love it. She’s not being swayed by Trump’s idiocy."

"Kind of weird when a judge actually following the law is to be applauded," wrote one commenter.

"Nothing like using the government to go after your opposition. Good thing this kinda stuff only happens in Russia, North Korea, and China. Oh shit nevermind. This is so destructive for our democracy," read another tweet.



 



 



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

12 bipartisan senators urged an independent review of the DOJ’s handling of Epstein files, citing missed deadlines and excessive redactions
13 minutes ago
Judge Amir Ali said that officials canceled Mark Zaid’s security clearance without due process and failed to conduct a proper national security review
1 hour ago
'Because the law requires us to release all documents related to Jeffrey Epstein in our possession so that’s what we are doing, you dope,' DOJ said
2 hours ago
'Glad the Woke Right is having a mask off moment to tell people to make Ohio blue before 2026 and 2028,' Laura Loomer wrote on X
3 hours ago
'Doing so will ensure that the American people can hear the facts directly from Mr Smith, rather than through second-hand accounts,' his attorney said
5 hours ago
The US Chamber of Commerce and the Association of American Universities argued that the fee was unlawful, but Judge Beryl Howell dismissed their case
5 hours ago
Epstein’s brother, Mark, said he believed President Donald Trump had no clear limits when it came to protecting himself
14 hours ago
A photo of the undated orange sign shows the word 'mandatory' misspelled, underlined in red
15 hours ago
Joe Scarborough said the Epstein files show nothing damning on Donald Trump as the Department of Justice warned some claims are false
15 hours ago
Attorney Helene Weiss attacks Department of Justice over disorganized Epstein files.
17 hours ago