Nicole Kidman got restraining order against photographer who accused Taylor Swift's father of assault
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA: Nicole Kidman earlier felt unsafe because of an Australian photographer, who has now accused Taylor Swift’s father of assault.
As per reports, Ben McDonald alleged that Scott Swift hit him on his face while the pop sensation and her father were boarding a ferry wharf around 2.30 am on Tuesday, February 27.
View this post on Instagram
Ben McDonald claimed Scott Swift attacked him
The paparazzo reportedly claimed that Taylor Swift and her father Scott were leaving a party on a ferry wharf when Scott “charged” toward him and hit him on the left side of his face.
McDonald said, “He probably decided he needed to defend his daughter, for some reason. In 23 years I have never seen anything like it.”
Also, New South Wales Police reportedly said that the accuser “reported the incident and inquiries are now underway by officers attached to North Shore Police Area Command".
Also Read: Travis Kelce 'wants to be a house husband' to Taylor Swift and 'hang up his boots', claims source
Taylor Swift’s rep called paps ‘aggressors’
But Swift’s representative said, “Two individuals were aggressively pushing their way towards Taylor, grabbing at her security personnel, and threatening to throw a female staff member into the water.”
Ben McDonald was asked to keep distance from Nicole Kidman
Now, Page Six has revealed that McDonald along with his pal Jamie Fawcett harassed Kidman so much that she had to take a restraining order against them in 2005.
The actress, at the time, said that the two men placed an electronic listening device outside her home, making her feel vulnerable.
View this post on Instagram
She eventually won the case, and McDonald and Fawcett were banned from engaging in conversation with Kidman. They were also asked to keep at least 60 feet of distance from her residence.
Internet reacts to Ben McDonald's claims and history
Meanwhile, the case has attracted mixed comments online with an X user tweeting, “It's important for their safety and privacy to take legal action when necessary. Nicole Kidman's decision to obtain a restraining order shows her commitment to protecting herself and her loved ones. Privacy is a fundamental right, and it's crucial for celebrities to have measures in place to maintain it.”
It's important for their safety and privacy to take legal action when necessary. Nicole Kidman's decision to obtain a restraining order shows her commitment to protecting herself and her loved ones. Privacy is a fundamental right, and it's crucial for celebrities to have measures…
— چوہدری سمیان (@I_samyan) February 27, 2024
Another user wrote, “So? TS PR pushing hard for a victim status on this one. The ‘altercation’ is on camera. He was attacked, unprovoked. Paps can be obnoxious but you don’t have a right to attack them for no reason.”
So? TS PR pushing hard for a victim status on this one. The ‘altercation’ is on camera. He was attacked, unprovoked. Paps can be obnoxious but you don’t have a right to attack them for no reason.
— JoJo (@JoJoGrl12) February 27, 2024
The third one shared, “From the story I read about Taylor's Dad, I think this pap just wanted a moment linked to Taylor's name.”
From the story I read about Taylors Dad, I think this pap just wanted a moment linked to Taylors name.
— Fescue Lane (@bernade66158105) February 27, 2024
“That’s just wrong what people do to get their name and money from someone who has to prove they r innocent,” the fourth user stated.
That’s just wrong what people do to get their name and money from someone who has to prove they r innocent.
— shar 🦋🇨🇦 (@shar14379903) February 28, 2024
Ah yes, the same Ben McDonald that Nicole Kidman was granted a restraining order against for planting a listening device on her property. You think he’s telling the truth but Scott isn’t, why is that?
— Tia ⸆⸉ Sydney N2! 🌻🦦🍁🫶 (@tiahooley) February 28, 2024
The fifth one added, “Ah yes, the same Ben McDonald that Nicole Kidman was granted a restraining order against for planting a listening device on her property. You think he’s telling the truth but Scott isn’t, why is that?”
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.
More from MEAWW