Pelosi torpedoes Trump's 'beyond reconsideration' NATO exit with law Rubio wrote

A bipartisan 2023 NDAA provision, co-sponsored by Marco Rubio during his Senate tenure, served as the primary legal barrier to the president
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi insisted that the 77-year-old NATO alliance could not be dismantled by President Donald Trump's executive order, setting up a potential court battle (Getty Images)
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi insisted that the 77-year-old NATO alliance could not be dismantled by President Donald Trump's executive order, setting up a potential court battle (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A major constitutional showdown has erupted between the White House and Capitol Hill on Saturday, April 4, following President Donald J Trump’s latest declaration that he is ready to pull the United States out of NATO.

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph this week, the president dismissed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a "paper tiger" and stated that a US exit was now "beyond reconsideration."

However, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) moved swiftly to neutralize the threat, citing a 2023 federal law that explicitly bars any president from unilaterally withdrawing from the alliance. 



"The law is clear," Pelosi posted on social media. "No president can withdraw from NATO without Congressional approval."

She further characterized the president's rhetoric as "shortsighted" and a strategic "gift to Vladimir Putin," warning that abandoning our allies would dismantle 77 years of global stability.

Marco Rubio-backed law blocks NATO exit plans

The primary legal barrier facing the president is a bipartisan provision inserted into the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The measure was co-sponsored by Trump’s current Secretary of State Marco Rubio during his tenure in the Senate.

The law requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate or a specific Act of Congress before the US can terminate its membership in the Atlantic Alliance.



Despite his past sponsorship of the bill, Secretary Rubio appeared to pivot this week, telling Fox News that the administration may need to "reexamine the value" of NATO given the current geopolitical climate.

Nevertheless, legal experts note that the 2023 statute remains a "high legal barrier" that would likely take years to litigate, effectively trapping the president in the pact for the duration of his current term.

NATO allies' refusal to join 'Epic Fury' fuels rift

The president’s renewed hostility toward NATO stems from a deepening rift over the US-led war effort in the Middle East.

Trump has expressed intense frustration with European allies who have refused to allow US aircraft to use their airspace or airfields for 'Operation Epic Fury' strikes.

AYLESBURY, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 18: (L-R) U.S. President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announce an agreement between the two countries as they hold a press conference conference at Chequers at the conclusion of a state visit on September 18, 2025 in Aylesbury, England. This is the final day of President Trump’s second UK state visit, with the previous one taking place in 2019 during his first presidential term. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)
While the US demands help securing the Strait of Hormuz, European leaders have fumed over being 'not consulted' on the war's outset (Leon Neal/Getty Images)

"I don't think that the president of the United States should say to a NATO country, if you haven't paid 2%, I say to Russia, have at them," Pelosi remarked, referencing Trump's previous threats to abandon members who failed to meet defense spending targets.

She reminded the administration that NATO allies were the only ones to ever invoke Article 5, the collective defense pledge following the September 11 attacks on the United States.

'Hollow-out' strategy vs formal withdrawal

With a formal exit blocked by Pelosi and the 2023 NDAA, the president is reportedly considering a "hollow-out" strategy to effectively neutralize NATO from within.

This could involve using executive authority to unilaterally withdraw US troops from Europe or excluding American forces from the NATO command structure.

KEHL, GERMANY - APRIL 04:  Military attend the commemoration for the dead NATO soldiers during the N
Analysts suggest Trump may 'neutralize' US involvement in practice, leaving the alliance intact on paper but operationally 'hollow' (Getty Images)

Such a move would undermine the core principle that "an attack on one is an attack on all," even if the US remains a member on paper.

Pelosi has vowed that House Democrats will fight any attempt to "splinter our alliance," insisting that America’s commitment to Article 5 must remain "ironclad" to deter rising tides of tyranny.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Panic broke out at the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner after a gunman opened fire
56 minutes ago
Gavin Newsom emphasized that a free press is essential to the country and made it clear that violence has no place in society
1 hour ago
Don Lemon argued that journalists attending the dinner were 'complicit' in normalizing what he described as unconstitutional behavior
2 hours ago
Donald Trump admitted he was observing what was happening and felt he could have 'gotten down a little faster'
3 hours ago
Nancy Pelosi referenced her family’s experience with political violence and offered prayers for the injured officer and those affected by the incident
3 hours ago
After the WHCD shooting, President Donald Trump confirmed an officer was injured and stressed unity across political divisions
5 hours ago
The gunman avoided security monitoring by handling the weapon inside the room before suddenly moving toward the main event
6 hours ago
The Secret Service said a person was taken into custody after 'a shooting incident'
8 hours ago
Donald Trump responded to a New York Times report saying that a no-bid contract for Clark Construction was expanded, raising Lafayette Park costs
13 hours ago
Trump argued that the cost of the Federal Reserve project appeared excessive and called for further scrutiny of how the costs were calculated
13 hours ago