Russia sanctions bill could hand Trump sweeping new tariff powers

A little-noticed tariff provision in the Senate's Russia sanctions bill is drawing scrutiny as critics warn it could broaden Trump's trade authority
The Senate's Russia sanctions bill is facing new scrutiny over a provision critics say could significantly expand President Donald Trump's tariff authority. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
The Senate's Russia sanctions bill is facing new scrutiny over a provision critics say could significantly expand President Donald Trump's tariff authority. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A Russia sanctions bill that overwhelmingly cleared the Senate is drawing fresh attention over a provision critics say could significantly expand President Donald Trump's authority to impose tariffs, shifting debate beyond Moscow and toward the future of US trade policy.

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 18: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a Black History Month reception in the East Room of the White House on February 18, 2026 in Washington, DC. The president issued a proclamation recognizing Black History Month on Feb. 3. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump speaks as the Senate-approved Russia sanctions bill heads to the House, where a separate tariff provision is drawing growing attention. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act passed the Senate in an 86-11 vote before lawmakers left for the August recess. While the legislation is primarily aimed at increasing economic pressure on Russia over its war in Ukraine, a separate tariff provision has prompted objections from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, who argue Congress could be granting the president broader powers over international trade.

The legislation now heads to the House, where the tariff language is expected to face closer scrutiny.

Tariff provision draws fresh scrutiny

Much of the debate has centered on language that would allow the president to impose steep tariffs on countries that continue purchasing Russian energy.

(Getty Images)
The Russia sanctions bill passed the Senate by an 86-11 vote before moving to the House for consideration. (Getty Images)

Critics argue the provision could extend beyond Russia policy by giving the White House wider discretion to use tariffs against other countries.

Sen. Rand Paul unsuccessfully sought to remove the tariff language before final passage, arguing Congress was delegating one of its constitutional responsibilities.

"What sort of feckless Congress gives away their power?" Paul said during Senate debate.

Several Democrats also voiced concerns, warning the legislation could further expand presidential authority over trade policy at a time when tariff powers have already become the subject of legal and political disputes.

Supporters cite safeguards

Despite those concerns, most senators ultimately backed the legislation, arguing the sanctions package remained too important to derail over disagreements about the tariff provision.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer testifies before the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on December 09, 2025 in Washington, DC. Greer faced questions from senators during a hearing on
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer assured senators the administration would follow guardrails governing the tariff authority. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

According to Reuters, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer assured lawmakers the administration would follow guardrails governing the use of the new tariff authority, helping secure broader bipartisan support for the measure.

Supporters also argued the legislation is designed to pressure countries that continue importing Russian energy rather than create an unrestricted new trade tool.

The sanctions package passed with overwhelming bipartisan support despite the objections raised during debate.

House battle could reshape bill

With Senate approval secured, attention now shifts to the House, where lawmakers are expected to closely examine the tariff language before considering final passage.

MUNICH, GERMANY - FEBRUARY 15: U.S. senator Lindsey Graham participates in a panel at the 61st Munich Security Conference on February 15, 2025 in Munich, Germany. International defence and security leaders from around the world are gathering for the February 14-16 conference. (Photo by Johannes Simon/Getty Images)
The legislation now moves to the House, where lawmakers are expected to closely examine the bill's tariff language before final passage. (Johannes Simon/Getty Images)

Some lawmakers have indicated they want changes to the provision, arguing Congress should preserve its oversight role over trade policy while maintaining pressure on Russia.

The debate is expected to focus less on the sanctions themselves, which enjoy broad bipartisan backing, and more on whether the bill grants the executive branch broader tariff authority than Congress intended.

If House lawmakers amend the tariff provision, the legislation would need to return to the Senate before it could reach Trump's desk.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Independent journalist Aaron Rupar later dubbed the attempt 'the worst Lindsey Graham impression of all time'
36 minutes ago
BBC was due to receive President Trump's business documents on August 6, but a federal court paused the handover after his lawyers objected
1 hour ago
South Carolina senator emphasizes affordability and family struggles ahead of Tuesday's special election
1 hour ago
President Trump said future Iran talks would include US compensation demands, turning Tehrans reparations push into a new negotiating battle
2 hours ago
Around 20 states and the District of Columbia maintains 'tuition equity' policies that allow undocumented students to access in-state tuition rates
2 hours ago
The letter also urged the admin to explain interagency coordination on bases and the legal safeguards protecting military personnel and families
2 hours ago
Newsom said Democrats are favoring candidates who challenge the status quo as voters grow frustrated over costs
2 hours ago
Peter Navarro blasted Jeanine Pirro for not firing the prosecutor involved in Jan 6 cases against him and Steve Bannon
3 hours ago
Mamdani cited Franklin D Roosevelt and Fiorello La Guardia, who pursued reform agendas and advanced New Deal policies during the Great Depression
3 hours ago
Mike Johnson launched the website in response to the Democratic Party’s growing socialist wing and recent US primaries
3 hours ago