Tucker Carlson defends Erika Kirk, accuses feds of failing to investigate Charlie Kirk shooting
Tucker Carlson defends Erika Kirk amid ongoing attacks against her, calls out federal and state authorities for their handling of Charlie's assassination.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) February 15, 2026
"I never weigh in on it because I love his widow, Erika... I'm sad to see so much of what's happened ever since."
"I will… pic.twitter.com/V3UQ5fgOtF
WASHINGTON, DC: Tucker Carlson has come to the defense of Erika Kirk as she faces mounting online backlash following the assassination of her husband, Charlie Kirk. Carlson accused federal authorities of failing to properly investigate the shooting, arguing that the lack of transparency has fueled speculation and hostility online.
Carlson said he is heartbroken by what Erika Kirk has endured and stressed that responsibility for solving the crime lies solely with federal and state authorities. He warned that targeting Erika or pushing unproven theories about her involvement distracts from the real issue — what he described as institutional failure.
Tucker Carlson says authorities failed to investigate Charlie Kirk’s shooting
During a conversation about the case, Carlson was asked whether the public is getting the full truth about what happened to Charlie Kirk and if those answers will ever emerge.
“I don’t know the answer,” Carlson said, explaining that he avoids weighing in because he loves Charlie’s widow and finds the situation deeply emotional. He added that investigating violent crimes is not the job of online commentators.
“Responsibility for investigating crime goes to the civil authorities. In this case, the federal and state authorities,” Carlson said. “The internet is not in charge of investigating crimes, and when the authorities fail to investigate crimes, the internet will fill the vacuum.”
Carlson argued that the current online chaos is the predictable result of official inaction.
“That’s what you’re watching now,” he said, referring to the surge in speculation and accusations surrounding the case.
Tucker Carlson warns official silence fuels online speculation
Carlson said people are speculating not out of malice, but because there are no clear answers from law enforcement.
“We’re speculating because there are no answers, and we don’t have any reason to trust that we’re going to get straight answers because there is such a long legacy of lying and deception from American law enforcement,” Carlson said.
He suggested that some of the most important details surrounding the shooting may remain hidden for years.
“I think some of the things we think about that are not sure — we won’t know until everything is declassified,” Carlson said.
Candace Owens criticism adds to backlash against Erika Kirk
Public scrutiny of Erika Kirk has intensified in recent months, fueled in part by criticism from Candace Owens, who has raised questions about the Kirk family and the circumstances surrounding the shooting.
Those remarks have sparked waves of online commentary suggesting Erika may be hiding information or knows more than she has disclosed. Despite the pressure, Erika has continued to make limited public appearances and has spoken about the difficulty of coping with her husband’s death.
Carlson condemned the attacks, arguing that blaming Erika distracts from holding authorities accountable.
Erika Kirk remains in spotlight after Utah campus assassination
Charlie Kirk was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, while speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, during his “American Comeback Tour.” He was the CEO and co-founder of Turning Point USA.
Since the assassination, Erika Kirk has appeared in repeated headlines as online speculation continues to swirl. Even when becoming emotional during memorial events and media interactions, she has largely maintained a composed public presence.
Carlson’s comments add to a growing debate over whether authorities have been transparent about the investigation — and whether that lack of transparency has unfairly placed Erika Kirk at the center of public suspicion.