DOJ defends meeting initial Epstein files release deadline while doubts linger over full disclosure

DOJ insisted that the initial Epstein Files deadline will be met, while further disclosures will follow a staggered release pattern to protect victims
UPDATED DEC 19, 2025
Democrats and Republicans warned that partial compliance with the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' undermined the law’s intent and risked retraumatizing survivors awaiting closure (Getty Images)
Democrats and Republicans warned that partial compliance with the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' undermined the law’s intent and risked retraumatizing survivors awaiting closure (Getty Images)


WASHINGTON, DC: The Justice Department on Friday, December 19, pushed back against claims that it would miss the statutory deadline to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, saying that it was meeting the “initial deadline” while continuing to review materials to protect survivors.

In a statement posted on X by its public affairs office, the department rejected reporting suggesting delays, arguing that the Trump administration was delivering unprecedented transparency compared to previous administrations.

“The DOJ is releasing a massive tranche of new documents that the Biden and Obama administrations refused to release,” the statement said. “The story here: the Trump administration is providing levels of transparency that prior administrations never even contemplated.”

Arizona man with a history of threatening behavior was arrested on Saturday after he reportedly threatened to execute a local synagogue rabbi in an email. (Getty Images)
Justice Department officials say the initial deadline under the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' is being met (Getty Images)

DOJ responds to deadline criticism

The statement followed mounting criticism from lawmakers after Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche claimed earlier that the department might not release the entirety of the Epstein files by Friday.

That warning triggered backlash from both Republicans and Democrats, who cited the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act’s' requirement that unclassified records be made public within 30 days of enactment.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: Pro-Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol following a rally with Pres
Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether all Epstein records are being released (Getty Images)

Justice Department officials insisted that the Friday deadline is being honored.

“The initial deadline is being met as we work diligently to protect victims,” the DOJ said, emphasizing that the review process is ongoing to ensure appropriate safeguards.

Accusations of incomplete disclosure

Despite the DOJ’s assurances, the department has previously faced accusations from lawmakers and watchdogs of failing to release the full scope of Epstein-related materials.

Critics have argued that prior disclosures were incomplete or overly redacted, fueling skepticism over whether the latest release will satisfy the law’s requirements.



Several lawmakers have warned that anything short of full compliance could violate the statute, which was passed by Congress last month and signed into law by President Donald Trump. 

Scrutiny over Biden administration's failure to release the Epstein Files

Former Vice President Kamala Harris was asked on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' on Wednesday, December 17, about why the Biden administration didn’t push for the disclosure of the Epstein Files while in office.

She revealed that the separation between the administration and the Department of Justice was intentional.



Harris added that the Biden administration believed that there should be an “absolute separation” between what they wanted as an administration and what the DOJ did.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Marco Rubio confirmed the Trump admin had ended ties with 66 global groups, citing taxpayer accountability and rejecting 'ineffective' institutions
50 minutes ago
Chris Murphy proposed a bill to curb DHS powers by banning face coverings, limiting interior raids, and boosting transparency after Renee Good's death
2 hours ago
Federal Judge Arun Subramanian issued a 14‑day restraining order, saying states had met the legal threshold to preserve aid programs
3 hours ago
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins cited Feeding Our Future, housing aid abuse, and daycare fraud probes to justify the funding freeze
4 hours ago
Jack Smith's team welcomed public scrutiny, with attorney Lanny Breuer noting he had long offered to testify openly and never resisted transparency
23 hours ago
Eric Swalwell and Dan Goldman proposed the 'ICE OUT Act' as lawmakers aimed to strip ICE officers of qualified immunity, citing accountability gaps
1 day ago
The Clinton postponed their December depositions with Bill's rescheduled for January 13 and Hillary's for 14, but neither have confirmed attendance
1 day ago
Judge Lorna Schofield blocked John Sarcone's IRS request, ruling only a lawfully appointed US Attorney could authorize disclosures
1 day ago
'Here I was leading a nice life, and now you've injected me back in here and are probably gonna make me the governor of Minnesota again', Ventura said
1 day ago
House approved a three-year ACA tax credit extension in a 230–196 vote, with 17 Republicans joining Democrats to revive subsidies for millions
1 day ago