Donald Trump's lawyers file $100M lawsuit against DoJ for Mar-a-Lago raid, Internet calls it 'frivolous'
![Donald Trump's lawyers file $100M lawsuit against DoJ for Mar-a-Lago raid, Internet calls it 'frivolous'](https://dxltb3n5j8l6j.cloudfront.net/710388/uploads/b8b3fde0-58c5-11ef-9709-ef91392fe2b6_1200_630.jpeg)
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA: Lawyers for former president Donald Trump are preparing a $100 million lawsuit against the Department of Justice, claiming that the government's historic Mar-a-Lago property raid in Palm Beach, Florida, in 2022 was carried out with the "clear intent to engage in political persecution."
The 77-year-old's memo has been obtained which claimed "tortious conduct by the United States against President Trump."
Donald Trump and his legal team intend to sue the Department of Justice for its conduct during FBI’s raid
In the midst of the federal investigation into his alleged improper retention of secret records, Donald Trump and his legal team plan to sue the Department of Justice for its action during the FBI's raid on Mar-a-Lago on August 8, 2022.
Special Counsel Jack Smith was assigned to conduct an investigation following the raid. In the end, Smith filed 37 felony counts against Trump, alleging false statements, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and deliberate withholding of information related to national defense. Trump entered a not guilty plea on all counts.
![CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA - JUNE 28: Republican presidential candidate, former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Greenbrier Farms on June 28, 2024 in Chesapeake, Virginia. Last night Trump and U.S. President Joe Biden took part in the first presidential debate of the 2024 campaign. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)](https://pisco-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/b6f1a109-1b91-4742-854f-b9eefe37a7f4.jpg)
District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Jack Smith’s case against Donald Trump
However, Jack Smith's lawsuit against Donald Trump was completely dismissed by District Judge Aileen Cannon last month. Cannon used the Appointments Clause of the Constitution to declare that Smith had been improperly funded and appointed.
Donald Trump's attorney Daniel Epstein filed notice to sue Department of Justice
Daniel Epstein, a lawyer for Donald Trump, submitted the notice of intent to sue the Department of Justice. Three months have passed since the DoJ received Epstein's notice, during which time it must react and reach a decision. Trump's case will be transferred to the Southern District of Florida federal court if a settlement cannot be reached.
"What President Trump is doing here is not just standing up for himself – he is standing up for all Americans who believe in the rule of law and believe that you should hold the government accountable when it wrongs you," Trump's attorney Daniel Epstein told Fox News' Lydia Hu.
![WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 01: Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on a recently unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former U.S. President Donald Trump on August 1, 2023 in Washington, DC. Trump was indicted on four felony counts for his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)](https://pisco-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/ea34bed1-6e57-43e2-a430-4b70426429c0.jpg)
What does Daniel Epstein's filing state?
Daniel Epstein's filing states that the "tortious acts against the president are rooted in intrusion upon seclusion, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process resulting from the August 8, 2022, raid of his and his family’s home at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach Florida."
He added that the decisions made by the DOJ and FBI regarding that raid were "inconsistent with protocols requiring the consent of an investigative target, disclosure to that individual’s attorneys, and the use of the local US Attorney’s Office."
Epstein argues the decisions made by Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray were not grounded in "social, economic, and political policy" but instead, in "clear dereliction of constitutional principles, inconsistent standards as applied to" Trump and a "clear intent to engage in political persecution – not to advance good law enforcement practices."
"Garland and Wray should have never approved a raid and subsequent indictment of President Trump because the well-established protocol with former US presidents is to use non-enforcement means to obtain records of the United States," Epstein wrote, adding "But notwithstanding the fact that the raid should have never occurred, Garland and Wray should have ensured their agents sought consent from President Trump, notified his lawyers, and sought cooperation."
Epstein continued, "Garland and Wray decided to stray from established protocol to injure President Trump."
![(America First Legal)](https://pisco-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/d29d4aaf-6d22-4fff-a0bf-9408dc59a83f.jpg)
Daniel Epstein argued that the DOJ violated Florida law
Daniel Epstein claimed that the DOJ had broken a Florida law pertaining to trespass upon seclusion, which is acknowledged as a type of privacy invasion. Intrusion upon seclusion includes "an intentional intrusion, physically or otherwise, into the private quarters of another person" and the intrusion "must occur in a manner that a reasonable person would find highly offensive."
"The FBI’s demonstrated activity was inconsistent with protocols used in routine searches of an investigative target’s premises," Epstein wrote, adding that Trump "had a clear expectation of privacy at Mar-a-Lago. Worse, the FBI’s conduct in the raid – where established protocol was violated – constitutes a severe and unacceptable intrusion that is highly offensive to a reasonable person."
Daniel Epstein argued 'malicious prosecution'
Daniel Epstein then made the case for "malicious prosecution." In his letter, he said that Donald Trump had been "brought a lawless criminal indictment" by the Justice Department and the special counsel's office. Epstein cited the Supreme Court's decision that a president is not subject to punishment for actions taken while in office.
"As such, given the Supreme Court’s immunity decision and Judge Cannon’s dismissal of the prosecution on grounds that the Special Counsel’s appointment violated the appointments clause and his office was funded through an improper appropriation, there was no constitutional basis for the search or the subsequent indictment," Epstein wrote.
Epstein also argued there was an "abuse of process," saying the process used against Trump was "unconstitutional and aimed at politically persecuting the former President, which led to extensive legal costs and negative consequences for him."
Epstein also said the DOJ’s "malicious prosecution and abuse of process cause President Trump to incur, upon information and belief, $15 million in actual harm due to his legal costs" in defending himself in Smith’s case before Cannon.
![PALM BEACH, FLORIDA - NOVEMBER 15: Former U.S. President Donald Trump and former first lady Melania Trump prepare to leave an event at his Mar-a-Lago home on November 15, 2022 in Palm Beach, Florida. Trump announced that he was seeking another term in office and officially launched his 2024 presidential campaign. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)](http://d2r3ijz46v2k0u.cloudfront.net/fdf2ec89-eb2e-4f41-8a20-41ee52265fd1.jpg)
Daniel Epstein is planning to sue for punitive damages
Daniel Epstein intends to file a punitive damages lawsuit as well. "For these harms to President Trump, the respondents must pay punitive damages of $100 million," Epstein wrote. A certified copy of Trump attesting to Epstein's legal representation of him for the notification to the Justice Department is attached to the document.
"You have clear evidence that the FBI failed to follow protocols, and the failure to follow protocols shows that there was an improper purpose," Epstein told Fox Business.
He added, "If the government is able to say, well, we don't like someone, we can raid their home, we can violate their privacy, we can breach protocols when we decide to prosecute them, we can use the process to advance our personal motive--not a motive of justice--if someone doesn't stand against that in a very public way and seek to obtain and protect their rights, then the government will have a mandate to roughshod over every American."
![Republican presidential candidate, former US President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign event on January 06, 2024 in Newton, Iowa. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)](https://pisco-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/8e4a5038-48ac-40c6-8af5-7e9a858f3352.jpg)
Internet says Donald Trump filed the 'most frivolous' lawsuit
Netizens deried the former president after he prepared a $100 million lawsuit against the Justice Department for the government's Mar-a-Lago property raid in Florida in 2022. One X user tweeted, "Of all the frivolous lawsuits Donald has filed, this is the most frivolous. What a whiny little b***h."
Another added, "The old man is losing it.Thanks DonOld! For taking the whole GOP down with you!" "This will be interesting. Our government hates Donald Trump, but he is a US president. He would have more power where he had democrat, but he still wields some pretty big power," opined one.
"Lawsuits, what he does... just a waste of taxpayer funds, when he loses he should have to reimburse us!" remarked someone else.
Of all the frivolous lawsuits Donald has filed, this is the most frivolous. What a whiny little bitch.
— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@BettyBowers) August 12, 2024
The old man is losing it.Thanks DonOld! For taking the whole GOP down with you!
— Electric Eric (@EricJansen30681) August 12, 2024
This will be interesting. Our government hates Donald Trump, but he is a US president. He would have more power where he had democrat, but he still wields some pretty big power.
— PenitentThief (@ThiefPenitent) August 12, 2024
Lawsuits, what he does... just a waste of taxpayer funds, when he loses he should have to reimburse us!
— LBC262 (@262LBC) August 12, 2024
This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.