Meghan Markle's Disneyland video sparks bizarre conspiracy theory that her children were added using AI

ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA: Meghan Markle's recent reel on Instagram, where the couple was seen enjoying a two-day trip to Disneyland, along with their children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, four, has sparked wild conspiracy theories. 

The video shared by the Duchess of Sussex included special moments from her family's visit to the theme park, where they had a blast on several rides, enjoyed delicious food, and also celebrated Lilibet's fourth birthday, according to the Daily Mail. 

In the post, both Lilibet and Archie's faces were covered with heart emojis by Meghan. She captioned the post, "Thank you @disneyland for giving our family two days of pure joy!"

Meghan Markle's Disneyland video sparks bizarre conspiracy theories

People on the internet thought there was something off with Meghan Markle's post, especially when it came to the photos with her children, with many claiming that the children were possibly added using artificial intelligence tools but didn't provide much proof. 

Some have pointed out perceived inaccuracies in the images, with some noting that it seemed Lilibet is levitating and have even claimed there is a "disembodied hand" holding her, as per the Daily Mail. 

Some falsely theorized that they never went to Disneyland at all, because if they did, other visitors would have spotted them. 

A Facebook user wrote, "I can't comment on artificial intelligence because I'm not an expert, but isn't it strange that she takes photographers everywhere? And it's also strange that the children didn't interact with each other throughout their trip to Disney. Something is wrong," while another added, "Did no other toursists spot them, take photos? Odd that."

One social media user commented, "Fake trip to Disneyland!!"

Adding to the AI claims, a person remarked, "AI or borrowed children. Something is very suspicious," whereas someone else bluntly wrote, "Isn't it amazing what AI can do these days."

"It’s not conspiracy, it could be true knowing megaliar the queen of photoshopping," another person theorized read, and one more added, "Another fake photo! Is this all that is ever posted here! Ridiculous. AI and everyone knows it. Give it up." 

Another person baselessly claimed that a nanny was edited out of a photo, or that the pictures were taken in winter, since Archie was dressed in layers and Lilibet appeared smaller than in other recent pictures shared by Meghan.

A person wrote, "I think everything they do is fake just look at the video before she gave so called birth," referring to the video Meghan shared of her twerking in the delivery room before her daughter Lilibet's birth. 

Body language expert weighs in on Meghan Markle's Disneyland video

Meanwhile, body language expert Judi James weighed in on the Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Disneyland video and told the Daily Mail that the couple wanted to show a "sense of unity" in their roles as parents, while "signalling affection" by placing their hands on Archie and Lili's backs in the family photos.

James added that the constant presence of the camera seemed to be the "third person" in their marriage as it followed their "every move."

The body language expert said as she reflected about the log flume ride photo, "The fact it follows from back view suggests a deliberate plan for this view of themselves as a couple and as doting playful parents to be presented to the public."

She added, "Their body language looks synchronised here suggesting this PR aspect is a mutual objective. But there are also moments where Harry and Meghan become children themselves, appearing on one ride screaming, mouth open in excitement."

James went on to say, "These views and glimpses seem to align in intention with the twerking videos as a Harry and Meghan re-brand, trying to show them as a more 'normal' couple and fun-based family behind the 'celebrity' and 'regal' facades."

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.