Obama condemns SC ruling on Voting Rights Act, urges Dems to ‘mobilize and vote in record numbers’

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map, ruling that race was used as the predominant factor in violation of the 14th Amendment.
Former President Barack Obama called the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling on Voting Rights Act (Getty Images)
Former President Barack Obama called the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling on Voting Rights Act (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Former President Barack Obama delivered a blunt rebuke of the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling that struck down a Black-majority district in Louisiana as “an unconstitutional gerrymander” and hinted that it dealt a blow to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

However, he mentioned that such setbacks can be "overcome," and called on supporters of the Democratic Party to mobilize and vote in "record numbers."

The 64-year-old Democrat released a sharply worded statement on Thursday, April 30, accusing the Supreme Court of “freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of 'partisanship' rather than explicit ‘racial bias.’”



In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority ruled that a Louisiana congressional map violated the 14th Amendment and was racially discriminatory against a group of white voters.

The court also limited how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a provision passed in 1965 that broadly outlawed discrimination in voting on the basis of race, can be applied in redistricting cases.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 05: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on October 05, 2021 in Washington, DC. T
The Supreme Court as seen on October 05, 2021, in Washington, DC (Getty Images)

Obama flags threat to ‘equal participation’

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 expanded access to the ballot for Black voters across local, state, and federal elections, reshaping American democracy and paving the way for broader multiracial representation.

However, Obama believes the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling is essentially upending that progress.

“It serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach,” his statement read.

Former President Barack Obama arrives for Public Homegoing Service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson at the House of Hope in Chicago, Friday, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Erin Hooley)
Former President Barack Obama arrives for Public Homegoing Service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson at the House of Hope in Chicago, Friday, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Erin Hooley)

To overcome this ruling, the former President asked Democrats to “mobilize” and “vote in record numbers.”

“The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers – not just in the upcoming midterms or in high-profile races, but in every election and every level,” his statement noted.

PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 17:  Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Ha
PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 17: Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Hall (Getty Images)

Kamala Harris rebukes Supreme Court ruling

Kamala Harris, former Vice President and the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, also blasted the Supreme Court ruling, calling it ‘outrageous.’

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling guts the Voting Rights Act and turns back the clock on the foundational promise of equality and fairness in our election systems,” her statement read.



“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was one of the last remaining federal protections for Black and brown voters against maps deliberately drawn to dilute their political power. That protection has been stripped away. It is an outrage. But it is not a surprise.”

She also stated that the ruling was “motivated by politics” and intended to “give an upper hand to Donald Trump’s Republican Party, which faces the threat of losing the upcoming midterm elections.”

“The mission before us is to restore the power of the people. There is no question our fight became harder today, but I know we are up for the battle,” the statement added.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

'To call Paxton ethically challenged is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer someone with an eating disorder', Thom Tillis told Jake Tapper
22 minutes ago
'Now we are talking about a posture where we may accept the nuclear material remaining in Iran? How does that make sense at all?' Thom Tillis asked
1 hour ago
Netanyahu signals pressure on Washington as US–Iran talks move forward
1 hour ago
Trump rejects JCPOA diplomacy, maintains naval pressure, demands strict Iran enrichment limits
1 hour ago
'The deal being floated with Iran seems straight out of the Wendy Sherman-Robert Malley-Ben Rhodes playbook', Pompeo wrote
2 hours ago
Rubio defends Trump’s Iran talks, rejects claims deal would boost nuclear ambitions
2 hours ago
'Do you know how many of my friends have Purple Hearts? Do you know how many of my friends got wounded? Yeah, a lot of them' Platner said
2 hours ago
Trump triggers backlash after posting graphic depicting political opponents in prison imagery
2 hours ago
Paul urges Republicans to give Trump ‘space’ for Iran talks, exposing GOP divisions over diplomacy
3 hours ago
The ads abandoned traditional campaign messaging, betting on voter fury over the Trump administration's refusal to release classified Epstein records
3 hours ago