Obama condemns SC ruling on Voting Rights Act, urges Dems to ‘mobilize and vote in record numbers’

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map, ruling that race was used as the predominant factor in violation of the 14th Amendment.
Former President Barack Obama called the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling on Voting Rights Act (Getty Images)
Former President Barack Obama called the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling on Voting Rights Act (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Former President Barack Obama delivered a blunt rebuke of the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling that struck down a Black-majority district in Louisiana as “an unconstitutional gerrymander” and hinted that it dealt a blow to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

However, he mentioned that such setbacks can be "overcome," and called on supporters of the Democratic Party to mobilize and vote in "record numbers."

The 64-year-old Democrat released a sharply worded statement on Thursday, April 30, accusing the Supreme Court of “freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of 'partisanship' rather than explicit ‘racial bias.’”



In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority ruled that a Louisiana congressional map violated the 14th Amendment and was racially discriminatory against a group of white voters.

The court also limited how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a provision passed in 1965 that broadly outlawed discrimination in voting on the basis of race, can be applied in redistricting cases.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 05: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on October 05, 2021 in Washington, DC. T
The Supreme Court as seen on October 05, 2021, in Washington, DC (Getty Images)

Obama flags threat to ‘equal participation’

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 expanded access to the ballot for Black voters across local, state, and federal elections, reshaping American democracy and paving the way for broader multiracial representation.

However, Obama believes the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling is essentially upending that progress.

“It serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach,” his statement read.

Former President Barack Obama arrives for Public Homegoing Service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson at the House of Hope in Chicago, Friday, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Erin Hooley)
Former President Barack Obama arrives for Public Homegoing Service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson at the House of Hope in Chicago, Friday, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Erin Hooley)

To overcome this ruling, the former President asked Democrats to “mobilize” and “vote in record numbers.”

“The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers – not just in the upcoming midterms or in high-profile races, but in every election and every level,” his statement noted.

PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 17:  Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Ha
PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 17: Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Hall (Getty Images)

Kamala Harris rebukes Supreme Court ruling

Kamala Harris, former Vice President and the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, also blasted the Supreme Court ruling, calling it ‘outrageous.’

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling guts the Voting Rights Act and turns back the clock on the foundational promise of equality and fairness in our election systems,” her statement read.



“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was one of the last remaining federal protections for Black and brown voters against maps deliberately drawn to dilute their political power. That protection has been stripped away. It is an outrage. But it is not a surprise.”

She also stated that the ruling was “motivated by politics” and intended to “give an upper hand to Donald Trump’s Republican Party, which faces the threat of losing the upcoming midterm elections.”

“The mission before us is to restore the power of the people. There is no question our fight became harder today, but I know we are up for the battle,” the statement added.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

JD Vance questioned whether Tim Walz had been directly involved or had simply ignored warning signs
14 minutes ago
Critics said that the breach exposed security gaps, as Mike Lawler called protection 'woefully insufficient' despite agents stopping intruder
1 hour ago
Will Cain cited a report claiming JD Vance questioned Pentagon claims, but Vance rejected it, saying he’s '100% certain' he never made those remarks
1 hour ago
As questions continued, Pete Hegseth grew irritated, called Jason Crow’s line 'a stunt,' and tensions escalated as both spoke over each other
1 hour ago
'The people like Comey have created tremendous danger, I think, for politicians and others', President Donald Trump said
6 hours ago
Fed holds rates at 3.50%–3.75% as gas hits highs, Warsh clears Senate hurdle
7 hours ago
GOP leaders removed the farm bill to break the impasse, winning over dissenting members and allowing the rule to advance
8 hours ago
Trump considered extending the naval blockade on Iran as stalled nuclear talks with Tehran prompted officials to review plans to maintain pressure
8 hours ago
Comey freed after brief hearing, defense prepares to fight 'vindictive' charges
8 hours ago
The Pentagon said the US had spent about $25 billion on the Iran war, mostly on munitions, with added costs for maintenance and equipment replacement
9 hours ago