Obama condemns SC ruling on Voting Rights Act, urges Dems to ‘mobilize and vote in record numbers’

In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map, ruling that race was used as the predominant factor in violation of the 14th Amendment.
Former President Barack Obama called the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling on Voting Rights Act (Getty Images)
Former President Barack Obama called the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling on Voting Rights Act (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: Former President Barack Obama delivered a blunt rebuke of the Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling that struck down a Black-majority district in Louisiana as “an unconstitutional gerrymander” and hinted that it dealt a blow to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

However, he mentioned that such setbacks can be "overcome," and called on supporters of the Democratic Party to mobilize and vote in "record numbers."

The 64-year-old Democrat released a sharply worded statement on Thursday, April 30, accusing the Supreme Court of “freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of 'partisanship' rather than explicit ‘racial bias.’”



In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority ruled that a Louisiana congressional map violated the 14th Amendment and was racially discriminatory against a group of white voters.

The court also limited how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a provision passed in 1965 that broadly outlawed discrimination in voting on the basis of race, can be applied in redistricting cases.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 05: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on October 05, 2021 in Washington, DC. T
The Supreme Court as seen on October 05, 2021, in Washington, DC (Getty Images)

Obama flags threat to ‘equal participation’

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 expanded access to the ballot for Black voters across local, state, and federal elections, reshaping American democracy and paving the way for broader multiracial representation.

However, Obama believes the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling is essentially upending that progress.

“It serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach,” his statement read.

Former President Barack Obama arrives for Public Homegoing Service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson at the House of Hope in Chicago, Friday, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Erin Hooley)
Former President Barack Obama arrives for Public Homegoing Service for the Rev. Jesse Jackson at the House of Hope in Chicago, Friday, March 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Erin Hooley)

To overcome this ruling, the former President asked Democrats to “mobilize” and “vote in record numbers.”

“The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers – not just in the upcoming midterms or in high-profile races, but in every election and every level,” his statement noted.

PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 17:  Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Ha
PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 17: Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Hall (Getty Images)

Kamala Harris rebukes Supreme Court ruling

Kamala Harris, former Vice President and the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, also blasted the Supreme Court ruling, calling it ‘outrageous.’

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling guts the Voting Rights Act and turns back the clock on the foundational promise of equality and fairness in our election systems,” her statement read.



“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was one of the last remaining federal protections for Black and brown voters against maps deliberately drawn to dilute their political power. That protection has been stripped away. It is an outrage. But it is not a surprise.”

She also stated that the ruling was “motivated by politics” and intended to “give an upper hand to Donald Trump’s Republican Party, which faces the threat of losing the upcoming midterm elections.”

“The mission before us is to restore the power of the people. There is no question our fight became harder today, but I know we are up for the battle,” the statement added.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Hillary Clinton argued that any Democratic nominee emerging from an open contest could have defeated Trump
47 minutes ago
Mike Collins' victory represents not just a primary win, but a measure of political influence inside Georgia GOP
1 hour ago
Top Trump ally Lindsey Graham says Iran deal is 'worth a try' despite deep skepticism
2 hours ago
JD Vance's appearance on 'The View' quickly turned into a series of tense exchanges as hosts pressed him on race, immigration, inflation, and President Trump's policies
2 hours ago
The move comes after reports suggested missile inventories were significantly reduced during operations in Iran
3 hours ago
JD Vance said he is troubled by Jeffrey Epstein's ties to powerful figures and reiterated his support for 'full transparency' in the case
4 hours ago
The White House moves the agency's primary statutory portfolios to the Justice Department and HHS via controversial interagency pacts
5 hours ago
Senate blocks Iran war powers measure in 47-48 vote, four Republicans support it
8 hours ago
Kamala Harris says Trump signaled intent to target political opponents, cites pattern
9 hours ago
Iran’s President Pezeshkian said the memorandum is a preliminary step, not a final deal
11 hours ago