Speaker Mike Johnson calls Democrats’ rejection of House resolution on Charlie Kirk ‘shameful’

Mike Johnson described the resolution as honoring Charlie Kirk’s patriotism and free speech, while criticizing Democrats for opposing it
Mike Johnson spoke against Democrats after House resolution honoring Charlie Kirk faced opposition (Getty Images)
Mike Johnson spoke against Democrats after House resolution honoring Charlie Kirk faced opposition (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: House Speaker Mike Johnson sharply criticized Democrats on Friday, September 19, for failing to fully support a resolution honoring conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed on September 10 during a speaking event at Utah Valley University.

The resolution passed the House with a 310-58 vote, yet 58 Democrats, including Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), voted against it.

Among Democrats, 58 opposed the resolution, 38 voted “present,” and 22 did not cast a vote.



 

House Speaker calls out Democrats over Charlie Kirk resolution

Speaking on Fox Business’s Kudlow, Johnson described the resolution as nonpartisan and a celebration of Kirk’s life, patriotism, and commitment to free speech.

“118 Democrats this afternoon, Larry, decided not to vote or to vote no on this resolution. All it does is affirm a young American who died too early, who gave his life to American principles and values and patriotism and free speech,” Johnson said.

“And it decried the assassination and political violence that’s taken over our country. Democrats voted against that, and I think it’s shameful.”

Charlie Kirk speaks at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking at his
Charlie Kirk addressed students at Utah Valley University before he was fatally shot on September 10, 2025 (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

Johnson noted that members across the aisle had initially expressed interest in recognizing Kirk’s legacy, but some Democrats ultimately withheld support. While House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his leadership team reportedly backed the measure, 38 Democrats voted “present,” and 22 abstained entirely.

“Everyone in Congress wanted to take some action. They wanted to go on record to affirm the incredible legacy and the life of our friend Charlie Kirk. Now the Democrats didn’t see it the same way, and in spite of that lofty language, that you just read there, that’s a sampling of the language in the resolution. There’s nothing partisan about it at all,” Johnson added.

NRCC criticizes Democratic leadership after Kirk vote

Following the vote, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) blasted Democrats for what it called a refusal to condemn politically motivated violence.

“The modern Democrat Party is simply too radical and unhinged to condemn a politically motivated assassination and honor a man and father of two whose only crime was loving America, winning the debate in the proper fashion, and inspiring others to do the same,” NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella said in a statement.

OREM, UTAH - SEPTEMBER 10: Charlie Kirk appears at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025 in Orem, Utah. Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking at his
Charlie Kirk appeared on stage at Utah Valley University hours before his death on September 10, 2025 (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune/Getty Images)

Authorities have charged 22-year-old Tyler Robinson with aggravated murder in connection with Kirk’s attack, with investigators linking him to far-left ideology.

Charlie Kirk, the conservative commentator and founder of Turning Point USA, was hosting one of his hallmark “Prove Me Wrong” sessions as part of his American Comeback Tour when the attack occurred.

Kirk leaves behind his wife, former Miss Arizona USA Erika Frantzve, and their two young children.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Judge Bennett disagreed with the decision, saying the appeals court should not have ruled on the case at this stage. The Trump administration wanted to withdraw its appeal and return to the lower court to discuss how the Supreme Court’s ruling would affect the case
2026-10-23T19:03:58.000Z
The lawsuit stems from the presence of a third Senate candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, whose name closely resembles that of incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan
2026-10-23T18:08:34.000Z
The charges are part of a probe into whether FBI officials sought to minimise allegations of corruption involving the Biden family and evidence linked to Hunter Biden’s laptop
2026-10-23T17:00:17.000Z
No official truce was declared as the US maintained its naval blockade of Iran and Tehran continued restricting access through the Strait of Hormuz
2026-10-23T15:44:52.000Z
Donald Trump’s 2026 midterm election stakes rise as competitive Senate races in Kansas, Texas, Ohio, Maine and Alaska threaten GOP control
2026-10-23T08:01:20.000Z
A spokesperson said that the allegations were 'completely false' and reaffirmed that Ilhan Omar is her real name
2026-10-23T04:04:58.000Z
Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the lower court’s order sought to address alleged misinformation about election rules rather than change the state law
2026-10-23T03:09:16.000Z
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine urged Vivek Ramaswamy to pull the Amy Acton ad, calling it 'deeply, deeply troubling' and wrong to run
2026-10-23T02:28:06.000Z
As per Pentagon officials, it gives a similar 'tingling sensation' as the blast of heat when opening an oven, resulting in a 10-15 minute itching and burning sensation
2026-10-22T20:33:58.000Z
A Miami federal judge warned Trump that the lawsuit could be dismissed unless he provided the requested information and sat for a deposition
2026-10-22T19:38:37.000Z