Trump’s $1.8B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund sparks GOP revolt, stalls Senate immigration bill
WASHINGTON, DC: A proposed $1.8 billion Justice Department fund intended to compensate Americans who claim they were targeted by a “weaponized” government triggered sharp backlash from Congressional Republicans this week, complicating President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda.
Several Republican lawmakers warned that individuals convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot could potentially qualify for taxpayer-funded payouts under the proposal. The dispute also forced Senate Republicans to postpone votes on a major immigration enforcement package before the Memorial Day recess, likely missing Trump’s June 1 target for passage.
Republicans revolt over DOJ’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund
Several Republican lawmakers publicly broke with the administration over the proposal, with some describing the fund as inappropriate and demanding stricter oversight. Rep Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa) said he and other lawmakers would “try to kill” the program and introduced legislation alongside Rep Tom Suozzi (D-NY) aimed at preventing federal dollars from being used for claims submitted through the fund.
The President’s taxpayer-funded payout to January 6th insurrectionists is an insult to every American. Today I filed bipartisan legislation to STOP it! pic.twitter.com/80eB0ycOXt
— Tom Suozzi (@RepTomSuozzi) May 22, 2026
“The President’s taxpayer-funded payout to January 6th insurrectionists is an insult to every American. Today I filed bipartisan legislation to STOP it!” Suozzi wrote on X.
“Taxpayer dollars will not become a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable,” Fitzpatrick said in a statement.
Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick on Trump's taxpayer-funded J6 slush fund: "I'm completely objecting to this and I'm going to do everything I can to fight it" pic.twitter.com/RZYSTAr8KE
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 21, 2026
Rep Don Bacon (R-Neb) also questioned the arrangement, saying, “It looks inappropriate. When you negotiate with yourself over taxpayer money, it doesn’t look right.”
McConnell bringing the heat after Blanche meeting with Senate GOP today
— Burgess Everett (@burgessev) May 21, 2026
“So the nation’s top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally wrong – Take your pick"
Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) delivered one of the harshest criticisms of the proposal. “So, the nation’s top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally wrong. Take your pick,” McConnell said.
"It's stupid on stilts":
— Really American 🇺🇸 (@ReallyAmerican1) May 21, 2026
Sen. Tillis BLASTS Trump's $1.8 billion slush fund, calling it "absurd" that taxpayer money will compensate those who attacked police officers.pic.twitter.com/M8RGQrjhhu
Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she opposed the fund “as it has been described,” while Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) threatened to vote against the broader reconciliation package if it included the provision. “These people don’t deserve restitution,” Tillis said. “This is just stupid on stilts.”
Senate immigration bill stalls amid Republican backlash
The backlash forced Senate Republicans to delay floor action on a major immigration and border enforcement package that would have allocated billions of dollars to ICE and Border Patrol operations.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met privately with Republican senators on Thursday, May 21, in an effort to defend the proposal and discuss possible guardrails for the program. However, several lawmakers emerged from the meeting unconvinced, and Senate leaders ultimately left Washington for the Memorial Day recess without advancing the bill.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged frustration within the conference and said leadership had not been consulted before the fund was announced. “It would have been nice” to receive advance notice, Thune said, adding that the situation had become “more complicated and bumpy” than Republicans expected.
Some Republicans defended keeping the process open-ended. Rep Andy Ogles (R-Tenn) said claims should be evaluated “on a case-by-case basis.” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La) said lawmakers were still awaiting details from the administration.
“He said they are setting up a fund to compensate all Americans who have been the subject, the target, of weaponization of the federal government,” Johnson said. “He did not say who will be eligible.”