Trump’s $1.8B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund sparks GOP revolt, stalls Senate immigration bill

Republicans warn taxpayers could end up compensating January 6 defendants under the DOJ proposal
Todd Blanche faced growing Republican criticism over the DOJ’s proposed $1.8 billion fund (Getty Images)
Todd Blanche faced growing Republican criticism over the DOJ’s proposed $1.8 billion fund (Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: A proposed $1.8 billion Justice Department fund intended to compensate Americans who claim they were targeted by a “weaponized” government triggered sharp backlash from Congressional Republicans this week, complicating President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda. 

Several Republican lawmakers warned that individuals convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot could potentially qualify for taxpayer-funded payouts under the proposal. The dispute also forced Senate Republicans to postpone votes on a major immigration enforcement package before the Memorial Day recess, likely missing Trump’s June 1 target for passage.

Republicans revolt over DOJ’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

Several Republican lawmakers publicly broke with the administration over the proposal, with some describing the fund as inappropriate and demanding stricter oversight. Rep Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa) said he and other lawmakers would “try to kill” the program and introduced legislation alongside Rep Tom Suozzi (D-NY) aimed at preventing federal dollars from being used for claims submitted through the fund.



“The President’s taxpayer-funded payout to January 6th insurrectionists is an insult to every American. Today I filed bipartisan legislation to STOP it!” Suozzi wrote on X.

“Taxpayer dollars will not become a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable,” Fitzpatrick said in a statement.



Rep Don Bacon (R-Neb) also questioned the arrangement, saying, “It looks inappropriate. When you negotiate with yourself over taxpayer money, it doesn’t look right.”



Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) delivered one of the harshest criticisms of the proposal. “So, the nation’s top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally wrong. Take your pick,” McConnell said.



Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she opposed the fund “as it has been described,” while Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) threatened to vote against the broader reconciliation package if it included the provision. “These people don’t deserve restitution,” Tillis said. “This is just stupid on stilts.”

Senate immigration bill stalls amid Republican backlash

The backlash forced Senate Republicans to delay floor action on a major immigration and border enforcement package that would have allocated billions of dollars to ICE and Border Patrol operations.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met privately with Republican senators on Thursday, May 21, in an effort to defend the proposal and discuss possible guardrails for the program. However, several lawmakers emerged from the meeting unconvinced, and Senate leaders ultimately left Washington for the Memorial Day recess without advancing the bill.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks at a news conference to announce an update on the Epstein files at the Department of Justice on January 30, 2026 in Washington, DC. Blanche announced that the department had released three million additional pages in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche spoke at a DOJ news conference in Washington, DC, in January 2026 (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged frustration within the conference and said leadership had not been consulted before the fund was announced. “It would have been nice” to receive advance notice, Thune said, adding that the situation had become “more complicated and bumpy” than Republicans expected.

Some Republicans defended keeping the process open-ended. Rep Andy Ogles (R-Tenn) said claims should be evaluated “on a case-by-case basis.” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La) said lawmakers were still awaiting details from the administration.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., speaks to reporters outside the chamber after passing a measure by unanimous consent that would fund most of the Department of Homeland Security, if the House agrees, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, April 2, 2026. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Senate Majority Leader John Thune spoke to reporters at the Capitol in Washington in April 2026 (AP Photo/J Scott Applewhite)

“He said they are setting up a fund to compensate all Americans who have been the subject, the target, of weaponization of the federal government,” Johnson said. “He did not say who will be eligible.”

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Kimberly Guilfoyle, 57, dated Donald Trump Jr for six years until 2024 before becoming US ambassador to Greece on November 4, 2025
1 hour ago
Ric Grenell denied Alina Habba’s allegations, saying he never received money from Turhan Mildon or redirected funds meant for the Kennedy Center
1 hour ago
According to sources, City Hall staffers were frustrated by Darializa Avila Chevalier’s social media posts and public statements targeting the NYPD
1 hour ago
Ilhan Omar has denied wrongdoing and accused the Trump administration of weaponizing federal law enforcement to target political opponents
2 hours ago
Donald Trump alleged that reports by The New York Times and CNN exposed US military movements and forced a change in the operation's timing
3 hours ago
Israelis are scheduled to vote on October 27 in the country’s first national election since the October 7, 2023, attacks
22 hours ago
Jon Ossoff ruled out a 2028 presidential bid, reaffirming his Senate focus while criticizing Mike Collins’ support for Donald Trump’s tariffs
22 hours ago
White House communications director and several Trump allies also praised her debut, arguing that she should be given time to settle into the role
23 hours ago
Jeanine Pirro is probing Ilhan Omar’s financial filings after her husband’s businesses reported sharp valuation increases
1 day ago
The Trump admin cited national security to justify press restrictions, but Judge questioned its claims and evidence against the news outlets
1 day ago