'There should be no exceptions to law': Internet disagrees with David Axelrod after he admits he'd be 'shocked' if Donald Trump is jailed

David Axelrod also shared his concerns about apocalyptic language being used by Donald Trump and his supporters
PUBLISHED JUN 1, 2024
Democratic strategist David Axelrod weighed in on Donald Trump's possible jail term saying it is 'worrisome' (Getty Images, @davidaxelrod)
Democratic strategist David Axelrod weighed in on Donald Trump's possible jail term saying it is 'worrisome' (Getty Images, @davidaxelrod)

WASHINGTON, DC: David Axelrod, a prominent Democratic strategist, expressed his skepticism about the likelihood of former President Donald Trump facing jail time following his conviction in the hush money case.

Axelrod also shared his concerns about apocalyptic language being used by Trump and his supporters which he warns may get him in trouble, similar to the January 6 roits.

David Axelrod warns 'more desperate' Trump and his supporters are 'inviting voilence'

Trump was convicted for falsifying business records related to hush money payments made by his former fixer, Michael Cohen, to porn actor Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 election.

This conviction made Trump first former US president a convicted felon.

"One of the things about this apocalyptic language that you hear from all of these, the... chorus, is, they really are inviting violence and that’s a big concern of mine, and Trump is completely unrestrained in suggesting that maybe that’s appropriate," Axelrod said while speaking on 'Real Time' with Bill Maher.



 

He linked this to January 6 events. "That’s how he got in trouble on January 6th, and he’s doing it again because I think he’s more desperate now than he was then," he said, according to The Hill.

David Axelrod says jailing Donald Trump is 'worrisome for our country'

Trump, maintaining his defiance, criticized the trial's outcome immediately after the verdict.

"This was a rigged, disgraceful trial. The real verdict is going to be November 5 by the people, and they know what happened here, and everybody knows what happened here," he declared outside the courtroom.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media after his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments at Manhattan Criminal Court on May 20, 2024 in New York City. Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first of his criminal cases to go to trial. (Photo by Mark Peterson - Pool/Getty Images)
Former US President Donald Trump, maintaining his defiance, criticized the trial's outcome immediately after the verdict (Mark Peterson - Pool/Getty Images)

He also slammed Judge Juan Merchan and called him a 'devil' in first press conference on Friday, May 31. Though Trump did not explicitly mention Michael Cohen's name, the former president said he was a "sleazebag."

Axelrod, while skeptical about a prison sentence for Trump in this particular case, raised concerns about the precedent it could set.

"I would really be shocked if this judge gave him a prison sentence" due to the hush money case, he said.

"There is something about jailing a former president, especially on something like this, that is, to me, worrisome for our country," he added.

Internet reactions to David Axelrod's comments about not jailing Donald Trump

Internet gave mixed reactions to Axelrod's comments about Donald Trump with many expressing their views.

One user argued, "If we entrench the idea that Presidents are so above the law they will face no consequences, even if convicted of a crime, you’re encouraging future Presidents to break the law."

Another user countered, "How can't they jail Trump and keep justice alive?"

Opinions varied widely with some distinguishing between the hush money case and other investigations Trump faces.

"I agree for this case but not J6, the classified documents, or the Georgia RICO cases," one commenter noted.

Others emphasized the principle of equal accountability under the law. "There should be no exceptions to law and order. Trump is a convicted felon," one user stated.

Another added, "If he thinks he should not be jailed, he must also think he should not have been charged, especially for this."

Some saw potential benefits in enforcing legal consequences for former Presidents. "I think jailing a former President would make future Presidents be more diligent in staying honest," one person suggested.



 



 



 



 



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

MORE STORIES

Supreme Court blocks Texas map favoring Republicans after lower court ruled it likely discriminates against Black and Hispanic voters
8 hours ago
North Dakota Supreme Court failed to overturn abortion ban as only three justices ruled it unconstitutional
1 day ago
Hanan Elatr Khashoggi cast the demand for the transcript as a continuation of Jamal's work standing up for human rights and criticizing Saudi rulers
1 day ago
The DOJ said California’s tuition law charged out-of-state citizens more than undocumented residents, calling it 'unequal treatment' under federal law
2 days ago
The House voted 426-0 to repeal the controversial provision that had been quietly added by Senate Republicans to the government funding bill
3 days ago
Clay Higgins added he would support the bill only if the Senate amended it to better protect victims and uninvolved Americans
4 days ago
A three-judge panel ordered Texas to use the 2021 map for 2026, dealing a major setback to President Donald Trump and Republican redistricting plans
4 days ago
Near-unanimous vote followed pressure campaign from Democrats and dissident Republicans as Mike Johnson urged the Senate to fix 'serious deficiencies'
5 days ago
Mike Johnson backed the Epstein bill but warned of 'deficiencies' that he said the Senate must fix, as these flaws could expose sensitive materials
5 days ago
The DOJ sued California over new mask and ID laws for federal agents, arguing they violate the Supremacy Clause and endanger officers
5 days ago