'Shameful': Internet slams James Comer for suggesting impeachment may not be 'best path' for holding Joe Biden accountable

James Comer said, 'The impeachment inquiry was meant to give us more tools to be able to gather more information to be able to win in court'
PUBLISHED MAR 23, 2024
Rep James Comer argued that criminal referrals may be a more suitable tactic for House Republicans than the impeachment vote against Joe Biden (@congressmancomer/Instagram, Getty Images)
Rep James Comer argued that criminal referrals may be a more suitable tactic for House Republicans than the impeachment vote against Joe Biden (@congressmancomer/Instagram, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC: The Chair of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, James Comer (R-Ky), expressed his opinion that criminal referrals will be the appropriate course of action and that the impeachment vote against President Joe Biden may not be the "best path."

Comer shared with Newsmax hosts on Thursday, “I believe that the best path to accountability is criminal referrals.”

What did James Comer reveal during his appearance on Newsmax on Thursday?

On Wednesday, March 20, the Oversight Committee convened a hearing concerning the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, according to a report by The Hill.

During the proceedings, Democratic members of the committee urged their Republican counterparts to identify the specific criminal activities that prompted their investigation.

As skepticism about the future of the inquiry into the incumbent president's business dealings grows, the pressure on Republicans to justify their ongoing investigation has intensified.



 

In the interview, Comer maintained that since the Democratic-controlled Senate will probably bring up Biden's impeachment "like they're gonna do with the Merrick Garland impeachment," "real accountability" for Biden now appears to be "providing real criminal referrals to the Department of Justice."

“I would vote to impeach Joe Biden right now. The impeachment inquiry was meant to give us more tools to be able to gather more information to be able to win in court,” the Kentucky GOP representative explained.

Democrats jumped at the chance to push Comer and other GOP members to identify the specific misdemeanor or felony that is the focus of their inquiry during the hearing.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Congressman James Comer (@congressmancomer)


 

Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) questioned why the impeachment was being pursued if the GOP had "no charges."

She claimed that despite Comer's repeated references to misconduct by the "Biden family," she has "yet to hear" from Republicans that accuse Biden of anything in particular.

“I am not hearing the specific allegation by this committee. What is it? It is not here. And that is the problem. The story is, when this committee knew they were working with falsified evidence? That is the story,” Ocasio-Cortez asked during the hearing.



 

"The Bidens" had committed crimes by selling "access to" the president, Comer claimed even after the hearing.

In an online statement, Comer asserted that he is going to request President Biden to appear before the committee "in the coming days" to "explain why his family received tens of millions of dollars from foreign companies with his assistance."

Internet slams James Comer for disclosing that he will not impeach Joe Biden

People on X mocked the Kentucky Republican for suggesting that opting for criminal referrals instead would be a much better-suited option for the House Republicans going forward.

One X user remarked: "Shameful. They can not dig themselves out of the rabbit hole."



 

Another user quipped: "James Comer's zeal for accountability with Biden is as genuine as a knockoff Rolex sold on a street corner. It's like watching a fox lecture on henhouse security while cozying up with the wolves."



 

Another user asked: "I thought the only way to have a criminal trial is if they first impeached and convicted Joe?"



 

One user wrote: "Once again, criminal referrals based on what SPECIFIC crimes??"



 

Another X user said: "So, they finally admit: they got nothing."



 

Finally, this user tweeted: "If they had a crime, they’d be impeaching."



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

The measures will restrict ICE actions at schools, hospitals, and courthouses, while expanding privacy safeguards and legal avenues for migrants
9 minutes ago
Jeff Merkley and Catherine Cortez Masto introduced the 'Change Corruption Act', which sought to ban living presidents from appearing on US currency
1 hour ago
The 85,000 visas revoked in 2025 is more than twice the number of those that were canceled last year
11 hours ago
Crockett said: 'Now, there are those who say, ‘Ain’t no way, we done tried this 50 kinds of ways.’ Let me be clear: Y’all ain’t never tried it the JC way.'
18 hours ago
Donald Trump’s aid program, aimed at stabilizing agriculture, includes $11 billion in one‑time USDA payments to help growers facing rising costs
21 hours ago
Republicans are divided as the ACA subsidy deadline nears, with millions at risk of higher premiums if subsidies expire
1 day ago
Donald Trump advanced a nationwide AI rulebook seeking to override state laws, a move that has fueled legal uncertainty and deepened party divisions
1 day ago
Congress unveiled a $901 billion National Defense Authorization Act that set Pentagon priorities for 2026 by balancing both House and Senate demands
1 day ago
Seth Moulton’s comments come as Democrat lawmakers continue hammering the administration over its handling of the drug boat strikes
1 day ago
The map, which was passed with a vote of 57-41, redraws Indianapolis into four districts
2 days ago