'Shut up Beetlejuice': Lauren Boebert trolled for hailing Donald Trump's immunity decision as 'rule of law'

Lauren Boebert tweeted in reaction to the Supreme Court ruling claiming that the decision is going to be a setback for President Joe Biden
Lauren Boebert tweeted in reaction to the Supreme Court ruling that gave a significant amount of immunity to former President Donald Trump (Getty Images)
Lauren Boebert tweeted in reaction to the Supreme Court ruling that gave a significant amount of immunity to former President Donald Trump (Getty Images)

DENVER, COLORADO: On Monday, July 1, Rep Lauren Boebert (R-CO) expressed her reaction immediately following the conservative-controlled United States Supreme Court granting former President Donald Trump an exceptional level of immunity from criminal prosecution.

Legal experts asserted that the 6-3 ruling could allow US presidents to partake in criminal activity under the guise of official presidential actions, extending to the current president and future presidents, according to RawStory.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Lauren Boebert For Congress (@laurenboebert)


 

Rep Boebert suggested that the Monday ruling poses a setback for President Joe Biden, prompting several individuals on X to delve deeper into the landmark SCOTUS decision and point out her oversight on the matter.

What did Lauren Boebert say regarding Supreme Court ruling favoring former POTUS?

The MAGA-aligned congresswoman tweeted, “The Supreme Court isn’t “protecting Trump”. SCOTUS is simply ensuring the ruthless Biden admin follows the RULE OF LAW!”

The United States Supreme Court referred the federal case concerning former President Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election back to a lower court.



 

The lower court will now be responsible for determining whether the 78-year-old MAGA strongman's actions qualify for immunity protection.

The 2024 presumptive Republican presidential nominee and his legal team have consistently contended that he should be shielded from criminal prosecution for his actions during his White House tenure.


 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Team Trump (@teamtrump)


 

The Supreme Court's historic decision established that the former president holds broad immunity for his official acts during his presidency.

According to The Hill, Chief Justice John Roberts stated in his majority opinion, “At least with respect to the president’s exercise of his core constitutional powers, this immunity must be absolute."

"As for his remaining official actions, he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity" read the statement which later noted that there is “no immunity for unofficial acts.”

Lauren Boebert trolled for her reaction to Donald Trump's immunity decision 

One X user remarked, "SCOTUS actually doing the opposite of making sure the Biden Admin follows the rule of law."



 

Another user argued, "Technically speaking, the ruling just made it so Biden doesn’t have to follow the rule of law."



 

Another user claimed, "It's a win FOR ALL presidents."



 

One user wrote, "Biden no longer has to follow it. SCOTUS gave him ultimate power."



 

Another X user contended, "The court is protecting future presidents from political prosecutions. That's it in a nutshell."



 

Another user tweeted, "Excited that Biden can now do whatever he wants."



 



 

Finally, this user said, "Shut up beetlejuice."

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

Although Trump has historically favored mail-in or Election Day voting, he is voting in person during Florida’s early voting period
2026-10-23T20:23:04.000Z
Judge Bennett disagreed with the decision, saying the appeals court should not have ruled on the case at this stage. The Trump administration wanted to withdraw its appeal and return to the lower court to discuss how the Supreme Court’s ruling would affect the case
2026-10-23T19:03:58.000Z
The lawsuit stems from the presence of a third Senate candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, whose name closely resembles that of incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan
2026-10-23T18:08:34.000Z
The charges are part of a probe into whether FBI officials sought to minimise allegations of corruption involving the Biden family and evidence linked to Hunter Biden’s laptop
2026-10-23T17:00:17.000Z
No official truce was declared as the US maintained its naval blockade of Iran and Tehran continued restricting access through the Strait of Hormuz
2026-10-23T15:44:52.000Z
Donald Trump’s 2026 midterm election stakes rise as competitive Senate races in Kansas, Texas, Ohio, Maine and Alaska threaten GOP control
2026-10-23T08:01:20.000Z
A spokesperson said that the allegations were 'completely false' and reaffirmed that Ilhan Omar is her real name
2026-10-23T04:04:58.000Z
Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the lower court’s order sought to address alleged misinformation about election rules rather than change the state law
2026-10-23T03:09:16.000Z
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine urged Vivek Ramaswamy to pull the Amy Acton ad, calling it 'deeply, deeply troubling' and wrong to run
2026-10-23T02:28:06.000Z
As per Pentagon officials, it gives a similar 'tingling sensation' as the blast of heat when opening an oven, resulting in a 10-15 minute itching and burning sensation
2026-10-22T20:33:58.000Z