'She won't see a dime': Internet divided as jury orders Donald Trump to pay E Jean Carroll $83.3M over defamatory statements

The federal jury of seven men and two women declared the verdict on Friday, January 26, marking the sharpest legal setback for the potential GOP presidential nominee
Donald Trump should pay $83.3 million to writer E Jean Carroll for defaming her in 2019 (Getty Images, Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images)
Donald Trump should pay $83.3 million to writer E Jean Carroll for defaming her in 2019 (Getty Images, Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images)

MANHATTAN, NEW YORK: A Manhattan jury ordered former President Donald Trump to pay an eye-popping sum of $83.3 million in damages for defaming writer E Jean Carroll in 2019, reported The Hill.

The federal jury of seven men and two women declared the verdict on Friday, January 26, marking the sharpest legal setback for the potential GOP presidential nominee.

The jury ordered Trump to pay the plaintiff $11 million to repair her reputation, $7.3 million in other compensatory damages, and $65 million in punitive damages.

The final testimony of the case took place on January 26 when the former real estate mogul took the stand briefly to testify.

(Stephanie Keith / Getty Images)
E Jean Carroll won her defamation suit against former President Donald Trump (Stephanie Keith / Getty Images)

District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who presided over the trial, had previously determined Trump's guilt in defaming Carroll when he rejected her allegations of the former president sexually assaulting her in the 1990s.

This is the second time the Elle Magazine columnist has won damages from Trump. Last year, she was awarded $5 million after the former President was found guilty of sexual abuse and defaming her over a different comment.

Trump walks out before the verdict

Trump, leading the Republican primary polls with two landmark victories in the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary, exited the courtroom before the final verdict was read.

According to CNN's live updates from the trial, he left the Manhattan courthouse around 4 pm ET.



 

Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, responding to his exit, told CNN's Anderson Cooper, "I think it hurt him terribly. I mean, our whole case is about the fact that Donald Trump is unable to follow the law, unable to follow the rules, he thinks they don't apply to him."

Trump later slammed the verdict in a Truth Social post, calling it "absolutely ridiculous." He also stated his decision to appeal the "Biden-directed witch hunt" against him and the Republican Party.

Donald Trump lashed out at the Manhattan federal court verdict calling it 'ridiculuos' (Getty Images)
Donald Trump lashed out at the Manhattan federal court verdict calling it 'ridiculous' (Getty Images)

The former President has been splitting the time between the court and his campaign since the trial began on January 16. He had effectively used it as an election weapon in his speeches with remarks directed against Judge Kaplan and numerous Truth Social posts insulting Carroll.

Internet reacts mixedly to the verdict

Netizens are divided after the court ordered Trump to pay a whopping $83.3 million in damages to Carroll.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at Windham High School on August 8, 2023, in Windham, New Hampshire. (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Some netizens stated the verdict against Donald Trump was "unfair" (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Some suggested she would never see a dime, while another group called the verdict "unjust." Simultaneously, some also agreed that Carroll deserved it.

One user opined, "She wont see a dime."



 

Another user remarked, "Soon enough he’ll run out of money…. right?"



 

"That’s a ridiculous award and that woman will never see a cent of it," another response read. While one user said, "Should have been more."



 



 

One user added, "This seems fair and legitimate." Another user contradicted, saying, "Supreme Court will overrule."



 



 

"She deserves all of it after what he put her through," read a remark. On the other hand, one user called the ruling "terribly unjust and unfair."



 



 

This article contains remarks made on the Internet by individual people and organizations. MEAWW cannot confirm them independently and does not support claims or opinions being made online.

GET BREAKING U.S. NEWS & POLITICAL UPDATES
STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX.

MORE STORIES

In the message, Katie Porter urged supporters with a forceful anti-Trump tone, encouraging political opposition ahead of the upcoming election cycle
1 hour ago
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Democrats backed nonpartisan redistricting but now need a different approach
3 hours ago
Rubio told reporters he was there to carry out a joke, even striking a pose behind the lectern and drawing a few laughs from the room before heading back to his day job
4 hours ago
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker condemned the US Supreme Court ruling on voting maps, warning it weakens democratic protections nationwide
4 hours ago
Bernie Sanders cited $2.1 trillion for Iraq, $2.3 trillion for Afghanistan, and $1 trillion for Iran, highlighting the massive scale of US war spending
6 hours ago
Hakeem Jeffries said Donald Trump scrapped Obama-era policies, calling the Iran deal exit a destabilizing move driven by 'Obama derangement syndrome'
6 hours ago
Kamala Harris warned the ruling strips key voting protections and enables states to rush redistricting, risking diluted power for minority voters
6 hours ago
Writing for the majority, Alito agreed that the map was an “unconstitutional gerrymander,” noting that the legal standard for using race in redistricting had not been met
6 hours ago
JD Vance questioned whether Tim Walz had been directly involved or had simply ignored warning signs
8 hours ago
In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional map, ruling that race was used as the predominant factor in violation of the 14th Amendment.
9 hours ago